Shawyer also defends his ideas in the New Scientist letters this week, although he doesn't actually seem to answer any of the criticisms raised.
Shawyer also defends his ideas in the New Scientist letters this week, although he doesn't actually seem to answer any of the criticisms raised.
My first reaction was : if the thing's accelerating, how can the resonance be maintained? There seems to be mixing between the internal reference-frame of the waveguide and the space-time it's supposed to be moving through.I) A fundamental principle of his device is that it is that the waveguide is resonant with the microwaves. A change of wavelength would destroy this resonance and Q values of 50k or more should be impossible.
An interesting response from the technical director of the company he worked at, who turned it down.
The idea being that you get a greater force on the top surface than on the bottom, giving a non-0 resultant. My first thought was that there would also be a force on, and perpendicular to, the sides. As the sides slope, that force would resolve to a slight downwards force; at a guess, one the same size as the disparity between the top and bottom plates.