Slick named in teen sex-slave/pleasure-island lawsuit

[A'isha]

A link to a GLP article that's a cut-and-paste of the FromTheTrenches article in the OP?

That's the evidentiary equivalent of multiplying zeroes.

 

[Upchurch]

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2517068/pg1

Looks legit to me:

 

[tyr_13]

Also, you can name anyone you want to in any lawsuit you want to. That's not in and of itself evidence of anything. It's even less evidence when the lawsuit that supposedly names him isn't even directly cited and doesn't even have enough information to discern what the lawsuit is.

And again, it's the Daily Mail citing the National Inquirer, asserting a lawsuit exists which names Bill Clinton in some way, for some unknown reason, related to the other guy.

 

[Piscivore]

Really, or is it just nostalgia?

or maybe just gas?

His passion was, at least, more entertaining than this.

 

[bob_kark]

Still trying to understand how the lawsuit is against Clinton. I see accusations about someone else who Bill Clinton knows. Further proof that news is still a subjective term.

 

[icebear]

De Nile...

http://www.themuslimtimes.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/nile-river.jpg

 

[Trakar]

That Hillary Clinton probably should not be in the white house. For starters...

By what perverse twist of logic does any of that, even if we were to grant that the entire innuendo dripping portrayal was 100% correct in all of its aspects and implied but missing, details and accusations, rise to level that it should disqualify Hillary for the office of US president?

 

[bob_kark]

De Nile...

http://www.themuslimtimes.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/nile-river.jpg

What?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/what

 

[jj]

Well it's telling just how much right out of the Goebbels playbook the new right is willing to use.

I think it speaks clearly to intent as well as hatred.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

That Hillary Clinton probably should not be in the white house. For starters...

And yet she most likely will be. So sorry for your ilk.

 

[BenBurch]

I'm no lover of the Clintons but seriously - innuendo three times removed?

Thank you.

 

[GodMark2]

I miss BeAChooser.

Really, or is it just nostalgia?

or maybe just gas?

Poorly aligned sights.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

This is quite good enough for the Tea Partiers.

 

[LSSBB]

Getting seriously bad Robert Morrow vibes with this...

 

[Seismosaurus]

That Hillary Clinton probably should not be in the white house. For starters...

Why not?

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Why not?

Because that would mean a Democratic victory in 2016. So that would be a bad thing.

 

[SezMe]

Really, or is it just nostalgia?

or maybe just gas?

All of the above. When's the last time you had the pleasure of wading through a wall o' text?

 

[Seismosaurus]

I can see why the right wing would want to throw around the whole "He once knew somebody who knew somebody who might have been in the same room as somebody who knew a terrorist!" type of smear.

After all, it worked so superbly for them in their campaign against Obama.

 

[Mudcat]

That's the evidentiary equivalent of multiplying zeroes.

If the vacuous vacuums evident between the ears of the people espousing these theories is anything to go by, I'm guessing it's more like this:


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_hrcWwbVMSN8/SqaONsvCnaI/AAAAAAAAAsU/Z1BWV8eEd8I/s400/divide_by_zero1.jpg

​

 

[Ladewig]

Well it's telling just how much right out of the Goebbels playbook the new right is willing to use.

I think it speaks clearly to intent as well as hatred.

After I read the opening line in cited article:

This appears to be part of a pattern. That is, a real “war on women” – and girls – waged by the impeached and disbarred William Jefferson Clinton.]​

It struck me less as Goebbels and more like third grade taunts. "I know you are but what am I ?" "You're the one committing the war on women."