Skepticwiki historical jesus

[This Guy]

The first link says -

The story is hard to date with any confidence, but it cannot be later than about 220, CE (Goldstein:29). The italicized section is Amoraic, 4th c. at the earliest.

And, yea, I'm saying it doesn't agree with the gospel accounts. Which only means either it or the gospels are wrong. Of course, the gospels disagree on some details also, so maybe the Talmud got it right

I'm not stating an opinion on which, if either, is correct. Just showing what I found. You mileage may vary

 

[Dr Adequate]

The first link says -

The story is hard to date with any confidence, but it cannot be later than about 220, CE (Goldstein:29). The italicized section is Amoraic, 4th c. at the earliest.

Cheers, I missed that.

Not very impressive then.