• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Skeptics For 911 Truth

scooby said:
It doesn't surprise me that you cannot see it - there are none so blind as those too fond of their own voice. I made that one up on the fly, what do you think? To be honest, I was going to give it a day or two to give you time to quietly leave the board in shame, they seem pretty ruthless in here if you don't cut it. But I've got a few points to address from earlier in the thread, I'll go back through those before we catch up on this.
Click to expand...
"quietly leave the board in shame", huh? Pretty high opinion you have of yourself, big boy.
Why is it the idiots have such high self-esteem? I don't get it. They're stupid, but think they're smarter than anyone else in the whole wide world? Does it come from spending all their time on the woo boards, or what?
Anyone have an answer for this?
 
JimBenArm said:
"quietly leave the board in shame", huh? Pretty high opinion you have of yourself, big boy.
Why is it the idiots have such high self-esteem? I don't get it. They're stupid, but think they're smarter than anyone else in the whole wide world? Does it come from spending all their time on the woo boards, or what?
Anyone have an answer for this?
Click to expand...

I believe it's called overcompensating...
 
scooby said:
It doesn't surprise me that you cannot see it - there are none so blind as those too fond of their own voice. I made that one up on the fly, what do you think? To be honest, I was going to give it a day or two to give you time to quietly leave the board in shame, they seem pretty ruthless in here if you don't cut it. But I've got a few points to address from earlier in the thread, I'll go back through those before we catch up on this.
Click to expand...

How does "none so blind as those too fond of their own voice" not apply to you, here?

You make claim.

He asks for evidence.

You say he's blind.

Not very... un-blind of you...
 
pagan said:
Huh? You are the conspiracy theorist. You believe in the Bush adm. conspiracy theory. We don't, we are the sceptics.
Click to expand...

No.

You just saw the events of 9/11 and then the official account and decided that it didn't conform to your world view because you needed to believe that some mysterious all powerful cabal of western intelligence was responsible for 9/11 and every other thing in the world you felt was holding you back.

Go on, admit it, I'm right aren't I?
 
scooby said:
It doesn't surprise me that you cannot see it - there are none so blind as those too fond of their own voice. I made that one up on the fly, what do you think? To be honest, I was going to give it a day or two to give you time to quietly leave the board in shame, they seem pretty ruthless in here if you don't cut it. But I've got a few points to address from earlier in the thread, I'll go back through those before we catch up on this.
Click to expand...

So, basically, you were bluffing and you have no critique of my post. I figured as much (as did everyone else here) but I still wanted to give you at least a chance to pull something together,

I'm sorry you were unable to.
 
scooby said:
It doesn't surprise me that you cannot see it - there are none so blind as those too fond of their own voice. I made that one up on the fly, what do you think? To be honest, I was going to give it a day or two to give you time to quietly leave the board in shame, they seem pretty ruthless in here if you don't cut it. But I've got a few points to address from earlier in the thread, I'll go back through those before we catch up on this.
Click to expand...

ahhhh The philosopher.

The man who knows so much about nothing at all

It does not suprise me you cannot see yourself from our view - there are some so blind they love to hear their own voice. I made that one up on the fly, its pretty stupid and pompus I know. But to be honest scoob, I was going to give it a day or two to see if you were just really looking for inquiry into 911 or not. I guess since your not, you wont cut it in here, its pretty ruthless. I notice you adress points with more questions and circular arguements, so rather then listening to some vague ramblings from an anonymous kid on the net, I call socks and await the discovery of it.
 
Totovader said:
How does "none so blind as those too fond of their own voice" not apply to you, here?

You make claim.

He asks for evidence.

You say he's blind.

Not very... un-blind of you...
Click to expand...

come on man, give the kid a break toto, he is trying to hang out with adults and be grown uppy. What a cute little tacker. We should be helping him with his acne problems and letting him know it can be cured.
 
After much careful study, I believe I have found the problem in Lossleader's post. When LossLeader states:


LossLeader said:
.......the conclusion is simple - conspiracy theorists are idiots.
Click to expand...

This is is inaccurate. Conpiracy theorists are [Rule8]ing, bat@*1t insane morons. I trust the matter is now cleared up.
 
It could be 28th Kingdom or a number of others. I'm even getting a whiff of Pdoh from his posting style.
 
Might be PDoh's little brother... But the instant antipathy towards Loss Leader might be a clue.

Or maybe I've just caught conspiratosis.
 
scooby said:
But I've got a few points to address from earlier in the thread, I'll go back through those before we catch up on this.
Click to expand...

Addressing points? That would make a nice change. Every post of yours I've read so far has been totally content-free. Did you actually have something to say? Like, for example, what's actually suspicious about the official account of 9-11?

Dave
 
hellaeon said:
How about naming it 'People who believe 911 was an inside job regardless of what you tell us'

Why form a group? makes you feel more official? More like a special investigative team? the words 'try' and 'hard' come to mind.

You can beat around the bush (no pun intended) as much as you like in the forum, never officially towing the CTist line, but I can see your not interested in 'truth' your interested in some alternate reality you believe exists and you will never dare apply the same 'scientific method' you claim you have to that reality.

Your not a skeptic, stop lying. If want to play grown ups, go enroll at uni or college and study hard
Click to expand...


This is a good name
'People who believe 911 was an inside job regardless of what you tell us'

But I also like
'People who believe 911 was an inside job regardless of what the facts us'
 
scooby said:
OK skeptics - you can show us what you're made of.

Can anyone tell me whats 'woo' about this post?
Click to expand...

I found it!!

Actually, you're exactly right. When judging human affairs (where perfect knowledge is impossible), you need a judicial Standard of proof and not a scientific one.

Unfortunately for you, the judiCial standard of proof is lower than the scientific standard.

The evidence must prove the occurrance beyond a reasonable doubt when trying to establish guilt. There can be unanswered questions. There can be lOOse ends. There can even Be seeming contradictions. But, in the end, reasonable doubt must be raised.

When looking at the mountains of evidence of the official explanation of 9/11 and the paucity of evidence of any MIHOP or LIHOP scenario, the conclusion is simple - conspiracY theorists are idiots.
Click to expand...

I found the woo in the post. What do I win?
 
Scooby, may I ask you a completely unrelated question?

What is your position on the evolution vs creationism debate?
 
Brainache said:
Huh? I thought all scientific knowledge was provisional. Scientists are never 100% certain about anything. They always say stuff like: "the most probable solution to this is...." or "We can use this model to predict something to a high degree of probability..." or "the results of this experiment would tend to suggest..."
Click to expand...

True but the police don't.

Invariably you will find them saying stuff like "Let's drag them back in and ask them again." or "Forensics? I knew there was something we forgot, let's re-open the case!"

What we have here is a similar kind of problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom