• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Skeptic's Annotated Bible Refuted!!

1:3-5 God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19). D’oh, as if God needs light-producing objects to make light photons. He won’t in Revelation 22:5. Oh, I forgot, SAB doesn’t believe in God’s creative power anyway. So why does he even bother?

I think it's funny that the site says that SAB is all argument from outrage... yet this is clearly divine fallacy or argument from incredulity.

Why is this correct? Because God can do anything.
 
Just a pleasant reminder to Tektonics.org:

Your apologetics are unconvincing and a real let down. Sorry!


Slightly unrelated, but I think this page on Mithraism is absolutely hilarious! They claim Mithraism originates a few centuries after the New Testament was written, and if anything Mithraism borrowed from Christianity. Accuracy is irrelevant to Bible Apologists I take it...
 
"Luke 2:23 Males are holy to God, not females." SAB

Tektonic reply:
IN short, females get a break from consecrated service -- i.e., WORK. Stand up for your equal rights to be burdened with responsibility.


Wow, they have such a primitive attitude towards women. It's disguisting.
 
Yahweh said:
They claim Mithraism originates a few centuries after the New Testament was written, and if anything Mithraism borrowed from Christianity.

The early church fathers knew of the similarities between xianity and the ancient mystery religions. They came up with one of the all-time pathetic xian explanations: Satan had created these mystery religions before xianity in anticipation of Jesus - so the Jesus story would not seem so special.
 
Satan must have also created university departments and all of those pesky biblical scholars.

The bastard!

--J.D.
 
Yahweh said:
Slightly unrelated, but I think this page on Mithraism is absolutely hilarious! They claim Mithraism originates a few centuries after the New Testament was written, and if anything Mithraism borrowed from Christianity. Accuracy is irrelevant to Bible Apologists I take it...
Yahweh, did you read that essay carefully? I can't take any position on its accuracy, but it has the most comprehensive research bibliography on Mithraism I've seen online, and is more thoroughly footnoted than any online source arguing the contrary thesis. What makes you dismiss it out of hand?
 
DangerousBeliefs said:


I think it's funny that the site says that SAB is all argument from outrage... yet this is clearly divine fallacy or argument from incredulity.

Why is this correct? Because God can do anything.

You are confusing the earth preparatory days with the prepreparatory period where God created the universe.

God cannot do everything and anything.
He can do the doable.

The undoable cannot be done no matter how much brute power is applied to it.
 
Radrook said:

God cannot do everything and anything.
He can do the doable.

You know, I hope, that there are Christians who claim that God can do everything, including things that cannot be done. They explain this by claiming that God is above mortal logic.

And about the Sceptic's Annotated Bible, I would like if they made a version where they threw out all the ridiculous arguments and kept only the sensible ones.

By ridiculous ones I mean stuff like claiming that 1 Kings 19:19 and 2 Kings 2:11-13 are in contradiction or that 1 Kings 7:23 implies that pi is 3 (These were the first such example that I could quickly found).
 
I love the fact how tektoniks glosses over Revelations 14:3 and 14:4

From SAB:

14:3-4 Only 144,000 celibate men will be saved. (Those who were not "defiled with women.")

14:3
And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth.

14:4
These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.


SAB lists the full verse and even offers an explanation as to why the verse is extremely silly, and what does Tektonics say?

14:3-4 JW issue. We pass.

Aahh...blissful ignorance of the facts...
 
LW said:


You know, I hope, that there are Christians who claim that God can do everything, including things that cannot be done. They explain this by claiming that God is above mortal logic.

Of course there are illogical persons calling themselves Christian.
Such persons live in fear that if they say God cannot do everything he will haul back and dump them in a lake of fire where they will fry forever. That doesn't mean that they represent Christians who are not illogical. Just as charlatan scientists do not represent those who are not charatans.
 
RabbiSatan said:
I love the fact how tektoniks glosses over Revelations 14:3 and 14:4

From SAB:

14:3-4 Only 144,000 celibate men will be saved. (Those who were not "defiled with women.")

14:3
And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth.

14:4
These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.


SAB lists the full verse and even offers an explanation as to why the verse is extremely silly, and what does Tektonics say?

14:3-4 JW issue. We pass.

Aahh...blissful ignorance of the facts...

You really believe that is what the Bible means?

You are reading a book written in symbols literally.
The Bible uses the words "woman" and "virginity" as symbols. Not only in Revelations, but in the OT as well.

The apostle Paul refers to the Corinthian congregation and by extension to the whole church of Christ as a virgin.

2 Corinthians 11
1I hope you will put up with a little of my foolishness; but you are already doing that. 2I am jealous for you with a godly jealousy. I promised you to one husband, to Christ, so that I might present you as a pure virgin to him. 3But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent's cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ.

Of course what Paul was obviously referring to is spiritual purity.
Unsoiled worship of the only true God.

Knowing what is meant there helps us understand what is mean here:

Revelation 19:7
Let us rejoice and shout for joy [exulting and triumphant]! Let us celebrate and ascribe to Him glory and honor, for the marriage of the Lamb [at last] has come, and His bride has prepared herself.[Ps. 118:24.]


Conversely the Bible refers to cities and even whole nations as women, Sometimes their conduct is compared to harlotry as in the case of the city of Niniveh against whom the prophet Nahum prophesied:



Nahum 3


Woe to Nineveh

1 Woe to the city of blood,
full of lies,
full of plunder,
never without victims!
2 The crack of whips,
the clatter of wheels,
galloping horses
and jolting chariots!
3 Charging cavalry,
flashing swords
and glittering spears!
Many casualties,
piles of dead,
bodies without number,
people stumbling over the corpses-
4 all because of the wanton lust of a harlot,
alluring, the mistress of sorceries,
who enslaved nations by her prostitution
and peoples by her witchcraft.

5 "I am against you," declares the LORD Almighty.
"I will lift your skirts over your face.
I will show the nations your nakedness
and the kingdoms your shame.

7 All who see you will flee from you and say,
'Nineveh is in ruins-who will mourn for her?'
Where can I find anyone to comfort you?"

8 Are you better than Thebes, [1]
situated on the Nile,
with water around her?
The river was her defense,
the waters her wall.
9 Cush [2] and Egypt were her boundless strength;
Put and Libya were among her allies.
10 Yet she was taken captive
and went into exile.
Her infants were dashed to pieces
at the head of every street.
Lots were cast for her nobles,
and all her great men were put in chains.
11 You too will become drunk;
you will go into hiding
and seek refuge from the enemy.

Notice also that Jesus is called a lamb. Was he a literal lamb?
Of course not. The symbol of a lamb is used to represent his sacrificial death for us just as lambs were sacrificed for ritual atonement sin under the law of Moses.

John 1:29
The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!

1 Corinthians 5:7
Get rid of the old yeast that you may be a new batch without yeast–as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.


BTW
Paul is not talking of literal yeast.
Yeast represents sin and false teachings in the Bible.
That is why the bread eaten at Passover had to be without yeast.

Mark 8:15
"Be careful," Jesus warned them. "Watch out for the yeast of the Pharisees and that of Herod."

In short, your total unfamiliarity with biblical symbology is leading you to conclude that what you are reading is silly. That is why it is much wiser to admit one's inability to understand and simply accept that one needs to be taught insread of engaging in mockery.

Acts 8:
30Then Philip ran up to the chariot and heard the man reading Isaiah the prophet. "Do you understand what you are reading?" Philip asked.
31"How can I," he said, "unless someone explains it to me?" So he invited Philip to come up and sit with him.
 
re: the 144,000.

Was that code for a really big number in those days in that culture? Kind of like the Chinese said 'the 10,000 things' as code for a whole lot?
 
OK, I get it now. Yeast is sin and 144,000 just means a lot. The Bible should not be taken literally, but should be interpreted by the reader. How's about I just look at it as one really huge game of Telephone, in which the original story got hopelessly mangled after decades of being told and retold?

In other words, there may be a kernel of truth there somewhere, but since I can't determine which piece is true, I'll just flip all the cards over and decide I'm not going to bother believing any part of it until it's been proven.
 
juryjone said:
OK, I get it now. Yeast is sin and 144,000 just means a lot. The Bible should not be taken literally, but should be interpreted by the reader. How's about I just look at it as one really huge game of Telephone, in which the original story got hopelessly mangled after decades of being told and retold?

In other words, there may be a kernel of truth there somewhere, but since I can't determine which piece is true, I'll just flip all the cards over and decide I'm not going to bother believing any part of it until it's been proven.
When you say you're going to "flip all the cards over", are you referring to actual playing cards, or was that some kind of figure of speech?

Even determining the "literal" meaning of a text constitutes an act of interpretation on the part of the reader.
 
ceo_esq said:
When you say you're going to "flip all the cards over", are you referring to actual playing cards, or was that some kind of figure of speech?

Even determining the "literal" meaning of a text constitutes an act of interpretation on the part of the reader.

Actually, I was referring to the end of "What's My Line" when Garry Moore would have to end the "Mystery Guest" part of the game due to time - "I'm going to have to flip the cards over and reveal that the Mystery Guest is Soupy Sales!". In other words, game over, I'm going home.

I just get tired of people telling me the Bible is infallible, but you can't necessarily make any sense of it. Why should you have to be a scholar to "get it"? Why isn't it clearly written so there's not a requirement to interpret anything? If I was writing something that should be read by everyone, providing ultimate truth, I wouldn't use any inside references or colloquialisms like "flip all the cards over". Why couldn't God the almighty do the same?
 
juryjone:

You just need to have more faith. . . .

Flees flying bricks. . . .

--J.D.
 
Doctor X said:
juryjone:

You just need to have more faith. . . .

Flees flying bricks. . . .

--J.D.

At least bricks. I might have to use the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch.
 
Originally posted by Radrook You are reading a book written in symbols literally.
So... when it says homosexuality is an abomination, that's just symbology?

When it says God created the world in six days, that's just symbology?

When it says Jesus died and rose from the grave, that's just symbology?

When Paul says, "if this is just symbology, we are wasting our time," that's just symbology?
 

Back
Top Bottom