The harm isn't to first world consumers it's to scientific advancement in general and the harm caused by the continued demonization of food advancements that are directly helping people in under developed countries have enough to eat.
The plea for "Just gives us the choice" is so often used by Woo Slingers because on the surface is sounds so simple and reasonable. But much like the "Equal time For Creationism / Teach the Controversy" Nonsense, which I still say this is a 1:1 parallel with, given the uneducated the impression that a controversy still exists when none does is dangerous.
No one has still answered my question. If tomorrow some idiot decided that food that was picked in the field by a guy named Ted was harmful and a bunch of idiots started to believe him should your local grocery store be forced to label all foods picked by a guy named Ted?
The plea for "Just gives us the choice" is so often used by Woo Slingers because on the surface is sounds so simple and reasonable. But much like the "Equal time For Creationism / Teach the Controversy" Nonsense, which I still say this is a 1:1 parallel with, given the uneducated the impression that a controversy still exists when none does is dangerous.
No one has still answered my question. If tomorrow some idiot decided that food that was picked in the field by a guy named Ted was harmful and a bunch of idiots started to believe him should your local grocery store be forced to label all foods picked by a guy named Ted?
