Dogdoctor
Canis Doctorius
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2005
- Messages
- 14,786
Start a new thread re these and I will but otherwise that would be too off topic here and a hijack.
And, if I have time. Which I will try. But you sound like you aren't going to buy it no matter what so I'm not certain my time will be that well spent. Why don't you show your sincerity by providing evidence contrary to the above when you open the thread?
This was your previous post saying that you can use skeptical thinking to show those two ideas. Skeptical thinking would provide little use unless you have reliable data to deal with. In politics and morality there is usually not reliable data so you are dealing with unreliable data and skepticism would mostly tell us to be skeptical of any decision based on that. You can use it but it becomes very similar if not identical to using logic without skepticism. There is rarely reliable data in politics or morality but what skepticism might do is to point to a need to develop data about certain issues such as morality of politicians or abortion.No way! Skeptical thinking is needed to show the people who think, for example, that the Bush administration is acting on moral principles when it is a farce. And one needs to use skeptical thinking to show the anti-abortionists that you get less abortions when it is legal and people have access to birth control than you get by teaching abstinence only and making abortions illegal.