• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Simple question for Bigfoot enthusiasts: Why no unambiguous photos/videos?

Nope, I think they are just bipedal dogs best I can tell from what few reports there are, mostly in Michigan and Wisconsin. Whenever I hear about them I can't help but think of that picture of dogs playing poker.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, that rumor that RL started about Melba having dogman DNA mixed in with the bigfoot DNA in the study was true. Sally really did say that they had found it but that they were going to concentrate on bigfoot DNA only...............:covereyes
 
Well you know, it's a process moving from proponent to skeptic, that was one of many stairsteps on the way up.
 
Slocie's said:
Guess the stupid question would be. How would someone know they had Dogman DNA ~ LOL
Click to expand...

You know you have Dogman DNA cause it will bite you on the ass after you tell people you have it. Just like Melba and the BF DNA.
 
Does the advent of Dogman mean Bigfoot is finally leaving the country? People are tired of Uncle Hairy and want someone/thing new?
 
Oh yes, dogmen are the new thing now, not to be confused with werewolves who only change their form once a month. Dogmen are wolfey from the cradle to the grave, assuming they aren't paranormal that is.....
 
Drew, I am sure you know that the Gable film was announced as a hoax by the guy who made it. If you want to see the only purported "evidence", google "beast of 7 chutes" to see a very blurry photo.

As for the nomenclature......... some baboons (specifically, the chacma baboon and the olive baboon), have a very dog-like face, and applying the logic of "dog-man", would be called "dog-monkey".

Frankly, if you guys have somehow missed a population of hirsute bipedal apes, there is no reason to suppose that you haven't also been lax enough to miss a population of hirsute bipedal apes with snouts.

And some unicorns too........

Mike
 
Last edited:
Yes I only mention it because. Many footers thought it was real and it is bipedal
 
OT, or maybe back on topic . . .

I watched a bit of "The Incredible Hulk" on TV this weekend with my son. It was one of those deals where they tell you something about the movie at each commercial break. At one point, I hear the dude say that the special effects team aimed to create a 9' tall Hulk. While the Hulk is certainly more buff than any bigfoot would have a reason to be, this image conveys pretty much the scale of a man standing next to a 9' monster. (Tim Roth at 5'7" is a bit below average height, but he would have towered over Roger Patterson.)

So, there are things this big running around our woods, and we can't photograph them?

Here's a 7' Shaq next to a 6'4" Pat Riley for a bit more size perspective of a small bigfoot and a tall human.
 
Shrike, just like the banks are too big to fail, BF is too big to photograph. The camera needs a bigger aperature or something like that.
 
Sonny2 said:
Are dogmen possibly domesticable? Could we hunt Bigfoot in packs with them?
Click to expand...

I certainly mean to try if I ever run across a dogman litter that I can raise myself. I'm not sure how intelligent they are supposed to be but I think if they attend school they can manage a touch screen on an iPad with paws pretty easily.
 
Jodie, you're missing out on an opportunity. You could do a Dogman store online and sell whistles and stuff like that, even a training manual. Also write books about tracking and hunting with Dogman.
 
Oh like I would know...however I have dated some dogs, maybe I'm just the one to write the manual.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom