Simple Challenge For Bigfoot Supporters

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, there's "much heavier." And then there's "twenty times heavier than a man." :wide-eyed
 
Well, I think this just about does it for the Skookum Cast.

Me asking for the hair analysis which was performed on the '2-3" long black curly hairs found on the cast.http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=15569&view=findpost&p=426001

A well worded question regarding the placement of the 'dermals' on the skookum cast.
http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=15569&view=findpost&p=426113

A response from one the the skookum cast crew members
http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=15569&view=findpost&p=426264
 
We now have a new claim to overcome... Bigfoot hair and scat is yielding human DNA
Either that means BF is a feral human, or it is an excuse as to why it didn't come back 'Unkown', or the claimant is FOS.
http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=21116&view=findpost&p=42978 9


http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=21116&view=findpost&p=429789 said:
It's not human hair in the sense of it being from one of us. It is Fox's and his family members hair and scat they are and were testing. Bigfoot hair and scat if you will. Bigfoot hair and scat that is yielding human DNA.
Yours,
Jan
 
Last edited:
Dr. Jeffrey Meldrum said:
Description: Large, plantigrade, pentadactyl, entaxonic, elongate footprints of a hominoid biped. Footprint is flat, lacking a fixed longitudinal arch typical of human footprints. Frequently, indication of a transverse axis of flexion at midfoot present, occasionally producing a midtarsal pressure release ridge or disc. Ball is poorly differentiated from surrounding forefoot; rarely transected by a flexion crease, if sole pad extends sufficiently distal beneath proximal phalanges. Widest part of the foot lies at inferred position of metatarsal heads. Heel is elongate, broad and rounded...
...
 

Attachments

  • MTB Beach.jpg
    MTB Beach.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 5
Gob-smackingly stupid 'bigfoot' track find from Wisconsin:

http://www.gmtoday.com/news/local_stories/2008/Jan_08/01232008_09.asp

Check the pictures and note the depth of the tracks. Also this bit of brilliance:

The prints - about 2 feet in length and spaced about 4 feet apart, measured in stride, from heel to toe...

Yes, reliable evidence for bigfoot has not been found because they live in areas too remote and are too stealthy... except for when they stroll through the neighbourhood on Shalom Drive in the town of Farmington, Wisconsin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom