Simple Challenge For Bigfoot Supporters

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bigfoot is extremely cautious? I'd go so far as to say they make Ninjas look like clumsy day-glo clowns. No one has ever found one, no one has even found a hair off one let alone got close to capturing or killing one, and the best you can come up with is that they're a bit wary? It's almost like they aren't there, wouldn't you say?
 
I can imagine that kind of interview:

Q: So what sort of evidence do you have?

A: We have a Bigfoot body, we have Bigfoot DNA, we have video of a Bigfoot family having Thanksgiving dinner.

Q: Can we see the video?

A: We don't have any video, but we hope to have video. We're going to be shooting in July, which is when the Bigfoot Thanksgiving falls.

Q: How do you know that?

A: From the Bigfoot calendar.

Q: Oh? May we see the calendar?

A: We haven't found one yet, but we hope to. And we expect that when we do it will show the Bigfoot Thanksgiving in July.

Q: Oh, well, let's see the DNA report.

A: We don't have a report yet because we don't have the DNA yet, but when we do--

Q: Oh, well, let's have a quick look at the Bigfoot body you have.

A: We don't actually.....

etc.
 
kitakaze said:
Hilarious Matt Moneymaker - Fox News interview.

MM: "We have really good stuff and that's what we're shooting for."

FN: "And so when are planning to unveil this really good stuff?"

MM: "We don't HAVE REALLY GOOD STUFF, YET. I said that we have stuff, it's NOT REALLY GOOD."

Moneymaker finds it hard to drop out of bull$#!% mode.
Click to expand...

WOW! I thought that's what I heard the first time, but then I thought naw, no one could contradict themselves that badly, I'm just up past my bedtime and must have mis-heard him...

Yes indeed people, listen to the interview for yourself, that's exactly what he says!

If sales of his Bigfoot "expeditions" ever slow, perhaps Moneymaker can start selling expeditions to the hollow earth.
 
The thing is, any true Bigfooter would have to agree with Moneymaker.

We already have really good stuff, and are hoping to get some REALLY GOOD STUFF. The difference between the lower and upper case "good stuff" is the general acceptability of the evidence as convincing.

When Moneymaker says "we have", he is not specific about that evidence being strictly BFRO-derived evidence or other things such as the PGF, Skookum Cast, etc. In that respect, Bigfooters are likely to agree with him.

All Bigfooters are compelled (convinced?) with the existing evidence, and are hopefully trying (or waiting) for even better stuff.
 
Yeah, an expedition to Pellucidar in search of sagoths...

Makes sense...

Its possible, isn't it?
 
desertyeti said:
After several years of examining casts of purported Bigfoot footprints, buttprints, handprints, and knuckleprints, it dawned on me that the whole reason any of these are considered legitimate is that somone gave them a "thumbs-up" as being real prints. John Green (a journalist), Grover Krantz (a physical anthropologist), Jeff Meldrum (another physical anthropologist), and Jimmy Chillcut (a fingerprint specialist) are the most-quoted, and most revered figures in Bigfoot lore, yet none of them is actually a specialist in animal tracks and sign.

Hmmmmmmm says I. There are any number of animal tracking certification programs in existence, and the Shikari Tracking League is among the best. To be certified, a tracker is evaluated by a panel of expert trackers on basic field tracking abilities, identification, etc. These specialists can judge weight, age, and even gender of the animal being tracked in some cases. But what does it take to be a Bigfoot "expert?"

My long-winded monologue is gearing up for this proposal: What say someone (I'm happy to be involved if anyone's interested in actually doing this) devise a simple set of exercises using casts, photos, and/or footprint sites of real human tracks, and fake ones (made using say, a manikin's feet, or other prosthetics)? The object will be to see if any of the self-proclaimed BF "experts" can, as they claim, differentiate between prints made by real feet, and prints made by forgeries. If, as they claim, these master trackers can actually pick out real from false prints, hoorah! If not...well...

Any of the BF-supporters here want to try it and see if this is worthwhile? If not, perhaps we can design the test and start to formally request that the "experts" show us how easy it is to tell real from fake prints. Any thoughts on this?
Click to expand...

This is simply pointless. Why not just use fake bigfoot feet and see if they proclaim them real??? That should be easy enough, Ay?
 
Why not just use fake bigfoot feet and see if they proclaim them real???
Click to expand...

Now why hasn't anyone ever thought of that? Why haven't we skeptics ever posted examples? :D


Then again, why would anyone like Luminous, who knows the subject, ask these questions?...

In the meantime, bigfoot's tallywhacker has been spotted!

I kept the binoculers as still as I could, and saw what looked like a very old man with a grey jacket and pointy grey hat, sitting still, and then he got up and walked to his left, and I knew right away it was a sasquatch, he was tall very tall 10 to 12 feet and could see his hair, and his *tallywhacker*, so knew this was a male,
Click to expand...

http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bc-sas-photo/
 
Yes, the evidence is mounting...

More of the same unreliable, anedoctal, suspected or known of being hoaxed or mistaken stuff.

A pile of...
 
Luminous, let me introduce you to some of your fellow believers:

mythusmage on the PGF. Went on about snarling. Got a little scarce. Specialty: MK Davis-style observations, general weirdness.

SweatyYeti on the PGF. Never dodges questions. So, if the fingers bend, what must we pretend? Didn't like that one. Got a little scarce. Specialty: Semantics, evasion, mimicry.

carcharodon on the PGF. AKA Lyndon, AKA Mr. Furious has a little trouble with PGF 101. Got a little scarce.* Specialty: Breakdowns, meltdowns, B.L.T.'s. (big, loud Tourette's)

* I posted this so he'll be back foaming.:w2:
 
Regarding Matt Moneymaker's BFRO Michigan expedition.

From The Daily Press, Escabana, MI:

Letter: There’s no bigfoot in the U.P.

EDITOR:

I am a native of Wells and graduated from Escanaba Area High School in 1971. I went on to get a forestry degree from Michigan Technological University in 1976 and worked for the U. S. Forest Service, Mead Corp. and Champion International, plus I was the county forester for Alger county in 1987.

Regarding the story about finding bigfoot in the U.P., I have timber cruised everywhere in the U. P. and know it like the back of my hand. I did this for 10 years and not once did I ever see, hear or find any tracks of bigfoot.

Since I was in swamps many times that people have not visited in more than 100 years, if there was a bigfoot, that would be where they would be. I was in many muddy areas in swamps and in lowlands and not once did I see a track of bigfoot.

I also cruised timber around the Marquette area in rainy and sunny weather and found no sign of bigfoot tracks there either, or sightings. I also cruised timber in highland areas everywhere in the U.P and no sign of bigfoot there either.

I have only heard one person in 10 years tell me they saw something that walked upright across a road at night. Other than that, in my 10 years of being in the woods everywhere in the U.P. I saw no sign of bigfoot at all, not even in the Porcupine Mountains.

I feel Matthew Moneymakers’ search for bigfoot in the U.P. is a folly. The real people to ask about bigfoot are the lumberjacks and the foresters, as they are in the woods a lot and know the difference between a bear and bigfoot or any other animal.

If there were bigfoot in the U.P., I would have found a track or some sort of evidence during that time as I have walked many miles of muddy and dry logging roads of all sorts, new and old ones, or would have heard from other foresters of a bigfoot sighting or track.

Paul Bader, Green Bay
Click to expand...
On the Big Timber payroll, oh yeah.:rolleyes:
 
You know what they will say...

This guy saw nothing, but plenty of others did...

And that's why hunters see it, hikers see it
Even educated folks see it
Let's see it, let's see bigfoot

Apologies to Cole Porter...
 
Bigfoot is seen only by Bigfoot believers.

No, no, no! They become believers after they have seen it.
 
William Parcher said:
Bigfoot is seen only by Bigfoot believers.

No, no, no! They become believers after they have seen it.
Click to expand...

Dear Penthouse Bigfoot Forum:
I used to read the letters posts in your magazine website, with some disbelief, but then one day as I was hitchhiking across the Pacific Northwest, a bus full of cheerleaders stopped and gave me a ride...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom