• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Siesmic Evidence Proves Inside Job?

what are the qualifications of these men to be analyzing seismic data? scholors for "truth" lists ross as being a mechanical engineer, doesnt show furlong at all

are there any seismologists who say seismic evidences supports explosives?
 
Hold up guys, you need to read the paper I linked. It is not about the seismic data from the collapses, it is about the seismic data from around the time of jet impacts. The paper asserts that the seismic spikes which are attributed to the jet impacts actually occured many seconds before the jets hit.

He uses the radar data and the seismic data, both tied to UTC. I am genuinely curious what the debunk of this will be.
 
Last edited:
I'm seeking serious comment on the merits/demerits of this paper.
Click to expand...

IMO, one the of the biggest demerits is that it was written by "scholars" from the "truth" movement. That alone makes me seriously question its validity without having to even read the whole thing.
 
The paper asserts that the seismic spikes which are attributed to the jet impacts actually occured many seconds before the jets hit.
Click to expand...

What's to debunk? Huge explosions SECONDS before impact? Bahh!
Try again!
 
Last edited:
what are the qualifications of these men to be analyzing seismic data?
Click to expand...
One point made in the paper is that the energy of impact would be almost completely absorbed by the tower. A mechanical engineer is the perfect person to know that.

More to the point, it doesn't take any sort of expert at all to know that the seismic spike produced by a jet impact cannot occur before the jet impact.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
One point made in the paper is that the energy of impact would be almost completely absorbed by the tower. A mechanical engineer is the perfect person to know that.
Click to expand...

A structural engineer would be better. But you have a hard time with those, doncha?

More to the point, it doesn't take any sort of expert at all to know that the seismic spike produced by a jet impact cannot occur before the jet impact.
Click to expand...

Since we have already proven it would be impossible to plant explosive charges in the manner you describe, this would indicate that Ross is off by several seconds.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Hold up guys, you need to read the paper I linked. It is not about the seismic data from the collapses, it is about the seismic data from around the time of jet impacts. The paper asserts that the seismic spikes which are attributed to the jet impacts actually occured many seconds before the jets hit.

He uses the radar data and the seismic data, both tied to UTC. I am genuinely curious what the debunk of this will be.
Click to expand...

I, for one, am not reading anymore mindless retarded BS from amateur researchers. I dont care if he has an astrophysics PhD, this man is not qualifed to study seimic data.

You do realize what the implications are of arguing that there were significant seismic events before the airliners struck, correct? One of those implications being setting off massive charges in the basement 56 and 102 minutes before the collapse(or demolition if you'd like)
I've never seen explosives go off and freeze in time for an hour or more. Explain, and dont tell me to read to piece you linked.
 
apathoid said:
I, for one, am not reading anymore mindless retarded BS from amateur researchers. I dont care if he has an astrophysics PhD, this man is not qualifed to study seimic data.

You do realize what the implications are of arguing that there were significant seismic events before the airliners struck, correct? One of those implications being setting off massive charges in the basement 56 and 102 minutes before the collapse(or demolition if you'd like)
I've never seen explosives go off and freeze in time for an hour or more. Explain, and dont tell me to read to piece you linked.
Click to expand...
It's all quite simple. The explosions were timed so that they went off nearly perfectly in sync w/ planes originating hundreds of miles away to go off at nearly the precise time the towers were struck by the planes. Then, many minutes later, thermite was lit to cut the core columns because the basement explosions were just for show and... oh crap I give up. I can't make any sense of this completely idiotic conspiracy scenario.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
More to the point, it doesn't take any sort of expert at all to know that the seismic spike produced by a jet impact cannot occur before the jet impact.
Click to expand...

You're ignoring the fact that it's impossible to accurately determine the time of the impacts down to the exact second. We can say it was hit at 8:46, but to state the exact second is impossible.

You're being totally disingenuous, Lieteller.

Steve S.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
One point made in the paper is that the energy of impact would be almost completely absorbed by the tower. A mechanical engineer is the perfect person to know that.
Click to expand...

couldnt it be equally argued that any explosives would also be absorbed by the tower?

what did the 1993 bombing register ont he richter scale? oh thats right, it didnt
 
I'm just trying to study this paper. Steve S brought up accuracy. Accuracy is a valid criticism. You're saying that the data available are not precise enough to support the conclusion. The margin of error is too great. OK. If true, that's valid.
 
I can't make any sense of this completely idiotic conspiracy scenario.
Click to expand...

Yeah, when ever I try to shave w/a razor that dull I cut myself.
When I cut into lot's of layers of onion my eyes well-up.
Freaken strange. Does this work? Are we on here? Test... one.. two! *thump*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom