That wasn't an international law.No, you simply are not aware of the facts.
Trump created the policy, Biden tried to kill it but then federal court forced him to reinstate it.
‘Remain in Mexico 2.0’: How did the Trump-era policy get revived?
The Biden administration reinstated the controversial 'Remain in Mexico' programme under court order in early December.www.aljazeera.com
I never claimed it was. It was an agreement between Mexico and the USA, and Biden was forced to reinstate it due to a ruling from a federal judge.
In what way is that an agreement with Mexico?
A policy is not an international agreement.
Judge Kacsmaryk, who is the go-to Texas nut job that Republicans always go to for far-reaching rulings according to his personal whims. The matter is actually still being litigated—under the Administrative Procedures Act, no less. The ruling is merely a preliminary injunction, not a final decision. Mexico disagrees with this policy.
It was an agreement between the USA and Mexico. The USA could not enforce this policy unless Mexico agreed.
Show me the actual agreement.
You specifically claimed that there was a safe third country agreement between the US and Mexico.
Can you show me the agreement, please? Can I read the actual words that you claim the U.S. and Mexico agreed to on this point?
The admission of error is admirable, but the petulant accusation isn't.
You keep saying there is an agreement. You have been pressed to present the agreement. And you haven't.
Still waiting for evidence that it is a violation of international law to set a ceiling on yearly refugees.
Still waiting for you to show me the agreement you claim exists between the U.S. and Mexico for treating asylum seekers.
It's a violation of federal law, before international law is even considered.