Allen773
Graduate Poster
I, for one, find America’s 44th President’s use of drone warfare deeply problematic and so I think he should be erased from American history.
I, for one, find America’s 44th President’s use of drone warfare deeply problematic and so I think he should be erased from American history.
I, for one, find America’s 44th President’s use of drone warfare deeply problematic and so I think he should be erased from American history.
This short film looks at potential consequences of cheaper more connected drones:Military drones didn't begin with Obama, and they'll continue in use far into any imaginable future. They'll continue to advance in speed, range, precision, lethality, and particularly sophistication. (Sophistication refers to the primary use of drones, surveillance, which is of far greater value than their attack capabilities. Bombs and missiles make good YouTube, but not cameras.)
They may even become cheaper, although let's hope not; it's best if they remain a weapon, and a tactic, only of the strong.
I, for one, find America’s 44th President’s use of drone warfare deeply problematic and so I think he should be erased from American history.
I'm not really sure of your point.
Is droning somehow worse than air or missile strikes?
Is droning somehow worse than air or missile strikes?
I'm going with bog-standard "Whataboutism"
So, are we going to erase George W. Bush and Nixon since they indiscriminately bombed civilians as well?
Why not?
Whatever. It's not going to happen.