• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Shooter at DC Shipyard

So according to you there's no such thing as a gun-free zone? :rolleyes:

I am pointing out how many guns there can be in a gun free zone. It may be better to call them gun restricted zones.

Yes, they do alter tactics. In the Navy Yard case the shooter went straight for the uniformed and openly armed security/police first - an easily identifiable threat to him and easily taken out with the element of surprise. Not so easy to identify which plainclothes person is carrying a concealed weapon.

Would you end all gun free zones and encourage as many as possible to arm themselves in case of attack, mass or otherwise?
 
I am pointing out how many guns there can be in a gun free zone. It may be better to call them gun restricted zones.
That's not a name gun advocates picked Nessie.

Would you end all gun free zones and encourage as many as possible to arm themselves in case of attack, mass or otherwise?
I don't encourage anyone to arm themselves, it's a personal choice. Just like I don't advocate for strangers to get abortions, or what car to drive, or how to dress themselves.

I think gun-free zones are feel-good do-nothing symbolic gestures that don't do anything to reduce mass killings.
 
That's not a name gun advocates picked Nessie.


I don't encourage anyone to arm themselves, it's a personal choice. Just like I don't advocate for strangers to get abortions, or what car to drive, or how to dress themselves.

I think gun-free zones are feel-good do-nothing symbolic gestures that don't do anything to reduce mass killings.

Gun free zones are a choice as well. If you dont feel safe being in a gun free zone you can go elsewhere to where there are lots of people with guns keeping each other safe.
 
It doesn't bother me that I am not allowed to carry in a courthouse. In fact, I am quite ok with that. Plus, I know there's plenty of officers not only at the entrance, but in the courtrooms themselves, but in the halls, the offices, and elsewhere in the courthouse. I'm in agreement that leaving guns out of courthouses is wise. They can be very emotional places, and distraught family, or friends of the accused, or whatever, can be very unpredictable. It's a wise move. Just making a point as to that is a place I cannot carry, but would need to go. Sorry, I wasn't clear.
 
However, he doesn't have much political capital left, since he's largely a lame duck president at this stage.
Not a lame duck yet. Second term presidents do not have to worry about re-election either. He is still going to stick somewhat to the party line as to not totally jeopardize the Dems chances in 2016.

Ranb
 
Today's FBI report confirms that Alexis was suffering from delusions of being tortured by "radio waves", that the delusions evidently began around 3 months before the shooting and motivated it, and that Alexis did not seem to be targeting anyone in particular during his rampage. They also released security video of Alexis, alone stalking the hallways and shooting at people.
 
The police reports on this guy made it rather clear that he was delusional and hearing voices. But apparently the private contractor who did the security report didn't even bother to pull the police reports.

So much for the vaunted efficiency of the private sector.
 
The police reports on this guy made it rather clear that he was delusional and hearing voices. But apparently the private contractor who did the security report didn't even bother to pull the police reports.

So much for the vaunted efficiency of the private sector.

Which police reports?

The FBI report suggests his condition began around 3 months before the shooting; it was my impression that he'd already gotten his clearance by that time.
 
Since this shooter had a secret clearance and was not PRP, the background check consisted of a criminal check, a records check to verify his identity and probably a credit check. I doubt that any reference interviews were even required. When you get to TS and TS/SCI clearances is when they really do a comprehensive investigation about who you are. This also applies to people who participate in the Personnel Reliability Program - which are basically people who deal with bombs, aircraft and certain command sequences.

Any of the events such as the firearm incidents or especially the ELF delusions would have placed an administrative hold on a TS and above and would have forfeited PRP status.
 
This also applies to people who participate in the Personnel Reliability Program - which are basically people who deal with bombs, aircraft and certain command sequences.

Unless it's has changed very recently PRP applies to folks who are closely involved with Nukes or Nuclear Command and Control procedures. It applies to folks who operate/maintain aircraft that actively are designated to carry nuke weapons, not conventional bombs. The remainder of your comments are correct...
 
Unless it's has changed very recently PRP applies to folks who are closely involved with Nukes or Nuclear Command and Control procedures. It applies to folks who operate/maintain aircraft that actively are designated to carry nuke weapons, not conventional bombs. The remainder of your comments are correct...

I always thought that any standoff system was PRP though there's a lot of blending there. I was on the "certain command sequences" side of the equation so cannot speak authoritatively on the ordnance folks.
 
Psychotic killer was psychotic:

The man who killed 12 people at the Washington Navy Yard 10 days ago left behind electronic documents saying that the government had been attacking his brain for the past three months using “extremely low frequency” electromagnetic waves created by the Navy, and that was the reason he needed to lash out, senior law enforcement officials said on Wednesday.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/26/u...-was-under-attack-official-says.html?hpw&_r=0
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom