It's not very likely that you'll get it twice, but it's far from impossible. As mentioned above, I've had it twice - and I got the two ShingrixI thought once you'd had it you were unlikely to get it again and that vaccination would be pointless ...
It's not very likely that you'll get it twice, but it's far from impossible. As mentioned above, I've had it twice - and I got the two ShingrixI thought once you'd had it you were unlikely to get it again and that vaccination would be pointless ...
Yes I have heard of people doing chickenpox and also measles parties, on the grounds of "get it over with." I suppose it made a little more sense (not a lot more, but a little) before any vaccines were available to avoid the diseases.
By the way, it's interesting to note that the Alzheimer's study was done in 2013, with the older Zostavax live-virus vaccine. So it seems it's not certain whether the same results might occur with Shingrix, which is much more effective on shingles itself. Zostavax is no longer on the market.
Not saying you're claiming it, but I don't see that as a reasonable explanation for exposing your kids to it if it's not so bad late if contracted. Kind of was for me in my 20s. We're not farm animals.Some of these conditions are relatively mild in childhood but can be a lot more serious later on. It makes sense in that context.
Rubella, in particular, was considered better for girls to get early, because of the likely effect on the child if contracted whilst pregnant.Some of these conditions are relatively mild in childhood but can be a lot more serious later on. It makes sense in that context.
The point is that it tended to be worse late, and the percentage of the population infected at some point was in the nineties. In the case of measles, 95%!Not saying you're claiming it, but I don't see that as a reasonable explanation for exposing your kids to it if it's not so bad late if contracted. Kind of was for me in my 20s. We're not farm animals.
The percentage of vaccinated people would probably have been higher if it weren't for RFK Jr.Measles: Epidemiology: Samoa (Wikipedia)
A measles outbreak in Samoa in late 2019 has over 5,700 cases of measles and 83 deaths, out of a Samoan population of 200,000. Over three percent of the population were infected, and a state of emergency was declared from 17 November to 7 December. A vaccination campaign brought the measles vaccination rate from 31 to 34% in 2018 to an estimated 94% of the eligible population in December 2019.
And in the case of measles (I don't know about the others), that percentage is not enough for herd immunity:Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (CDC)
Source: Health, United States, 2020-2021, Table VaxCh [PDF-9.8 MB] and Table VaxTn
- Percent of children vaccinated by age 24 months against measles, mumps, rubella (1 dose or more): 90.8% (birth year 2016)
- Percent of adolescents ages 13–17 years vaccinated against measles, mumps, rubella (2 doses or more): 91.9% (2019)
Colorado’s measles vaccination rate is just a bit too low for herd immunity (CPR News, April 1, 2025)
“What we call the community immunity or herd immunity threshold for measles is about 95 percent. So statewide we are falling short of that. So that does mean that Colorado is potentially at risk for outbreaks,” said the state epidemiologist, Rachel Herlihy.
I'm pretty sure my parents were opposed to intentionally catching diseases, though it's not possible to ask them now; but I did have all the then common diseases when I was young - measles, German measles (rubella), mumps, chickenpox and even a mild form of scarlet fever (which must have alarmed my mother in particular, since her brother died of it).Yes I have heard of people doing chickenpox and also measles parties, on the grounds of "get it over with." I suppose it made a little more sense (not a lot more, but a little) before any vaccines were available to avoid the diseases.
See the Guardian article quoted by dann, earlier:By the way, it's interesting to note that the Alzheimer's study was done in 2013, with the older Zostavax live-virus vaccine. So it seems it's not certain whether the same results might occur with Shingrix, which is much more effective on shingles itself. Zostavax is no longer on the market.
Last year, Oxford researchers reported an even stronger protective effect in people who received Shingrix, a newer vaccine. Geldsetzer is now looking for philanthropic and private foundations to fund a randomised clinical trial to confirm any benefits.
I got my jabs last year.
My wife OTOH, had some sort of antibody test that indicated that she doesn't need the shot, even though she is old enough to be eligible for it.
I'm not sure what to make of that. Is it just as well to have an antibody test and to forego the shots if the result of the test shows that you are already protected (naturally I assume)?
For reference:
![]()
Chickenpox and Shingles Tests: MedlinePlus Medical Test
Chickenpox and shingles tests check to see if you are or have ever been infected with the varicella zoster virus (VZV). VZV causes chickenpox and shingles. Learn more.medlineplus.gov
I'm not certain exactly what sort of test she had. She is Japanese, btw. I kind of suspect that the safe thing would be to get the vaccine anyway, but I don't know. ETA: she is too old to have been vaccinated for chicken pox. She would have had the natural virus itself as a child, as did I.
Exactly the same with me. No side effects whatsoever the shingles or any other shot I’ve hadI think I'm just lucky. I've not had significant side effects from any vaccination beyond soreness from the needle; even when I had Covid itself it was milder than a cold.