SEVEN released on streaming sites

[Oystein]

EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS
Gregory Szuladzinski, Ph.D
Chartered Consulting Engineer
Analytical Service Company

Robert Korol, Ph.D
Emeritus Professor of Civil Engineering
McMaster University

https://files.wtc7report.org/file/p...ollapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf

Korol and Gregory Szuladzinski have both worked with szamboti and Jones, so not sure how that counts as external peer reviewer.

https://experts.mcmaster.ca/display/publication1404588

https://www.researchgate.net/public...derstandings_Related_to_WTC_Collapse_Analysis

The project page at the ae911t website says:

...independent experts external to UAF and AE911Truth also reviewed the report...

https://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7

They call them not just "external" but "independent" there - which is a flat-out lie.

 

[Jaytje46]

When NIST came out with a computer modelled study, Truthers cried foul..but now is ok I guess.

 

[pgimeno]

And let's not forget that NIST took into account criticisms by truthers (notably David Chandler) for the final report, while the UAF report has completely ignored criticisms.

 

[Oystein]

And let's not forget that NIST took into account criticisms by truthers (notably David Chandler) for the final report, while the UAF report has completely ignored criticisms.

Not completely.
One Public Comment remarked that Hulsey had copied work (graphics, calculations, numbers down to five significant digits; amounting to almost three pages) from Tony Szamboti without crediting Tony's contribution (i.e.: plagiarized work).
The response was to do the calculations over with slightly different numbers for the final report - to avoid having to reference Tony.

 

[Jaytje46]

Prime video

Is it just me, or is the video not on Prime video, because when I search for Seven it does not show up, or is it just for the USA?

I guess that's why they need 50,000 dollars to advertise it for 2 million people.

https://action.ae911truth.org/donate_page/seven-ads?killorg=True&loggedOut=True

Not sure why they don't just put it on Youtube, much greater reach than Amazon Prime

 

[Leftus]

Not sure why they don't just put it on Youtube, much greater reach than Amazon Prime

Probably because it can get taken off the YouTube without warning or redress. With Prime, there is likely a contract.

 

[beachnut]

PhotoMatt has no evidence to back up the failed video -

 

[Dr.Sid]

Who is this Gage ? I thought Pitt and Freeman played in that ..

 

[TJM]

To be fair, he might've had Gwyneth Paltrow's head in one the boxes.



What's in the box Richard?! What's in the box!!?!

 

[carlitos]

Gaming search results by naming this video the same as a Morgan Freeman / Brad Pitt movie from the 90s is innovative.

ETA - now that I see the box cover, ae911truth has through the years exhibited all seven of these in spades.

[imgw=500]https://i.imgur.com/4GxyYeP.jpg[/imgw]

 

[carlitos]

too bad about Dylan Avery

Seven has been posted to Youtube as well so one does not have to be a streaming service subscriber to view it.

Nope. Taken down for copyright violation.

Not sure why they don't just put it on Youtube, much greater reach than Amazon Prime

I'll give you a couple of hints:

 

[xjx388]

I can't be the only person who saw the thread title not understanding how there could possibly be a conspiracy over the Brad Pitt / Morgan Freeman serial killer movie being on streaming...

Suckered me in too! I should have known because the title wasn't stylized as SE7EN.

 

[pgimeno]

Nope. Taken down for copyright violation.


I'll give you a couple of hints:

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/ecICv3n.png[/qimg]

Does that mean that they don't aim for maximum audience, but for maximum money?

 

[carlitos]

Don’t think of it as grifting; think of it as a tax on stupidity. If you are dumb enough to fund Gage and his band of misfits by shelling out $12.99 for a 45 minute “ultra high definition” version of a “documentary” featuring 20-year old digitized Long-lens camera footage shot in glorious 29.94 FPS, then you probably don’t deserve that money. You’d just spend it on whoopee cushions or whatever.

 

[cjnewson88]

Good grief.. it's 20 years on from 9/11 and people still think there were bombs in the twin towers? By this stage you're just being deliberately fanciful.

 

[bknight]

Good grief.. it's 20 years on from 9/11 and people still think there were bombs in the twin towers? By this stage you're just being deliberately fanciful.

Big disclaimer as I have not watched any SEVEN video, but isn't this thread concerning WTC7?

 

[cjnewson88]

Big disclaimer as I have not watched any SEVEN video, but isn't this thread concerning WTC7?

Quite likely but by "proving" WTC7 was a controlled demolition they are also therefore implying that the twin towers must also have been.

 

[bknight]

Quite likely but by "proving" WTC7 was a controlled demolition they are also therefore implying that the twin towers must also have been.

Lets see A equals B therefore A equals C, quite a logical fallacy.