• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

SEVEN released on streaming sites

PhotoMatt

Scholar
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
54
From AE911T - https://www.ae911truth.org/news/721-new-film-seven-available-today-on-multiple-streaming-platforms

I'm just gonna LOL in advance at the fauxgenineers who are gonna come out of the woodwork and try to discredit this. Well, the few that are left. Most of the debunkers and con artists have left this site because even they can't stand to continue to peddle the BS they have been for the past decade, or they have been kicked off the gubbamint payroll.

Great job TSz, and everyone else at AE911T. My only suggestion would have been to spend more time dumbing down the NIST lies so the average American could understand, but it's still an amazing achievement.
 
Last edited:
I'm just gonna LOL at the suckers who paid for it.

Surely you and your merry band of reality deniers can come up with better nonsense. Can't you?

Eventually SEVEN will be on Netflix and Hulu, so people won't have to pay for it if they have a subscription. Who knows, it might eventually be on the AE911T website where anyone can view it for free.

Before you come up with another nonsensical rebuttal, let me ask you this. Have you seen SEVEN? If not, how can you possibly comment on it? You can't possibly pretend to have any credibility if you comment on a documentary that you haven't seen, regardless of whatever fake reason you give as to why you won't watch it.

Of course credibility isn't something that most people who support the official story seem to worry about, and neither is science, so I guess the ridiculousness will continue.

ETA: LOL. All those people who said the AE911T/UAF study would never be released must feel somewhat foolish right now, if they have the capacity to feel anything at all after spending so much of their lives betraying humanity by supporting the mass murder of civilians and the furtherance of the surveillance state.
 
Last edited:
how dumb do 9/11 truth cult members have to be to believe this tripe

...
Eventually SEVEN will be on Netflix and Hulu, so people won't have to pay for it if they have a subscription. Who knows, it might eventually be on the AE911T website where anyone can view it for free.

Before you come up with another nonsensical rebuttal, let me ask you this. Have you seen SEVEN? If not, how can you possibly comment on it? You can't possibly pretend to have any credibility if you comment on a documentary that you haven't seen, regardless of whatever fake reason you give as to why you won't watch it.

Of course credibility isn't something that most people who support the official story seem to worry about, and neither is science, so I guess the ridiculousness will continue.

ETA: LOL. All those people who said the AE911T/UAF study would never be released must feel somewhat foolish right now, if they have the capacity to feel anything at all after spending so much of their lives betraying humanity by supporting the mass murder of civilians and the furtherance of the surveillance state.
Richard Gage spreads lies about 9/11 and gullible idiots fall for his lies.

The study is fraud, only idiots believe it.

Gage has no evidence for CD, milking the lies to get millions of dollars.

Gage fails again, fooling idiots who have no clue Richard Gage is evidence free with respect to 9/11 claims.

Gage a liar disrespecting those who were murdered by 19 terrorists, a delusional apologist for UBL and his failed followers. Gage a sick person fooling dumbed down gullible people.

If the Seven BS claims CD, and fire can't do it... then it is BS. If you believe in CD, and believe fire can't cause 7 to collapse, you lack the knowledge to understand 9/11.
 
Last edited:
Richard Gage spreads lies about 9/11 and gullible idiots fall for his lies.

The study is fraud, only idiots believe it.

Gage has no evidence for CD, milking the lies to get millions of dollars.

Gage fails again, fooling idiots who have no clue Richard Gage is evidence free with respect to 9/11 claims.

Gage a liar disrespecting those who were murdered by 19 terrorists, a delusional apologist for UBL and his failed followers. Gage a sick person fooling dumbed down gullible people.

Like clockwork, we get the same post from you without a shred of evidence to support any of your claims.

Have you read the study from front to back? Are you an engineer? If so, what are your credentials? Have you downloaded the publicly available data that they released in their report, all 600+ GB of it? Have you entered the data into your own copies of the engineering programs they used? Have you performed the same tests? If you answered "no" to even one question, what on earth makes you think you have any credibility or the right to criticize it?

Your feelings about Gage and AE911T are meaningless. They bear no weight whatsoever.

Now, let me answer my own questions.

I have not read the study from front to back. I am not an engineer. I have no engineering credentials. I have not downloaded the data. I don't own copies of the software they used, so I certainly could not have performed any of the tests and simulations Hulsey did. So, I have to answer "no" to every one of my questions.

This begs the question, what makes me so certain that I'm right and the reality deniers are wrong? Simple. The WTC7 study was public and peer-reviewed. The data is public. Their models match what was observed. They have no reason to lie. None. It's absurd to think that Hulsey conned AE911T out of $400K to create a fraudulent report. Any argument along those lines is foolish and with no basis whatsoever in reality.

It's foolish to comment if you haven't watched the documentary, but that doesn't seem to prevent people from still commenting. That speaks volumes to what is really going on in this forum.
 
...
Of course credibility isn't something that most people who support the official story seem to worry about, and neither is science, so I guess the ridiculousness will continue.
...

This is funny.
Gage has zero credibility, he spreads lies. (only gullible 9/11 truth believers fall for his dumbed down BS and thermite lies)
Gage supports a fantasy version of 9/11 and has no evidence. (his cult followers don't have a clue what evidence is)
Science, Gage is anti-science, he makes up claims based on the ignorance of those who believe his CD claims.

Yes, fake dumbed down fantasy claims, aka ridiculousness, will continue in Gage's cash cow conspiracy road show of WOO.


Gage disrespects those murdered on 9/11 by terrorists, spreading dumbed down lies.
 
This is funny.
Gage has zero credibility, he spreads lies. (only gullible 9/11 truth believers fall for his dumbed down BS and thermite lies)
Gage supports a fantasy version of 9/11 and has no evidence. (his cult followers don't have a clue what evidence is)
Science, Gage is anti-science, he makes up claims based on the ignorance of those who believe his CD claims.

Yes, fake dumbed down fantasy claims, aka ridiculousness, will continue in Gage's cash cow conspiracy road show of WOO.


Gage disrespects those murdered on 9/11 by terrorists, spreading dumbed down lies.

Are you not capable of posting evidence to support your claims? Of course you aren't. You just recycle the same old nonsense, as you have done for years.
 
You misunderstand.

I'm LOLing at the suckers who forked over cash to Gage in yet another of his scams. I'll LOL even harder if said suckers pay to see it.

A scam? Define scam, and how the WTC7 study fits the definition, please.

I'll wait right here.

Of course, you could argue against the substance of the report and documentary. Oh, wait, you can't because you didn't see the documentary.

Yet, here you are.
 
Last edited:
Where is your Pulitzer Prize, the biggest story since Watergate? oh no, no evidence

Like clockwork, we get the same post from you without a shred of evidence to support any of your claims....

You have no evidence for CD, you never will. You are gullible, believing the delusional claims of Gage and his failed group of nuts.

You have evidence for CD? NO
You have evidence for thermite? NO

You have BS from Gage's project to take money from gullible followers.

Spreading lies of CD?

Why can't you take the evidence (okay, you have no clue you have woo) and go to a newspaper and earn a Pulitzer Prize like Watergate?

Why? Because you have nothing but BS.

You seem to think you have evidence, then take it, do an end-run, because Gage has not taken his evidence to a Newspaper, and you can earn the Pulitzer Prize! Do it.

Why can't you take action, team with a newspaper with your evidence, and break 9/11 wide open?

Why can't you do it?

You have no evidence, you have delusional claims. Prove me wrong, go get the Pulitzer Prize, your/Gage's claims are bigger than Watergate!

Do it? No, you will not do more than spread lies, and promote BS based on woo.
 
Where is the Pulitzer? Why can't 9/11 truth team with a newspaper?

Another personal attack, which is nothing but an overused, ineffective, pathetic, worthless tool in your magic bag of lies and deceit.

When are you going to give it a rest, beachnut? The game is over. You lost.
I lost what? It appears that is projection again.
Where is your evidence? You lost it? lol

Gage is a liar, there was no CD.

Go get the Pulitzer, Gage has failed to take his "massive evidence" to a newspaper, and get one like Watergate... I mean exposing who killed thousands on 9/11 is the biggest story since Watergate, and the biggest Pulitzer ever...'

And you imply you GOTS the evidence, why can't you take it, since Gage is too stupid to step up, and earn the Pulitzer with your newspaper of choice?

Have you gone to any newspaper to break this Pulitzer Prize winning story?

NO, why not?

You are gullible if you believer in CD, it is simple fact, not a personal attack.

Why are you fooled by the BS Gage pushes? Where is your evidence?

I know there is no evidence for CD, why are you so gullible?
 
AE911T is a scam.

Thanks for waiting.

Based on what? Is that really the best you can do?

You certainly have the right to post whatever you want, but let's not pretend anyone gives any credibility to anything you say if you can't back up your statements with evidence and facts.
 
Gage has failed to take his "massive evidence" to a newspaper,

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...ntradicts-official-conclusions-301029854.html

https://canada.constructconnect.com...-building-did-not-collapse-due-to-fire-report

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/university-report-9-11-building-180400328.html

http://www.newsminer.com/test3/univ...deo_970dc3b4-b840-5d9b-a3bd-14d499b35ee6.html

https://www.c-span.org/video/?320748-5/washington-journal-architects-engineers-911-truth

Come on, beachnut. Quit pretending to have credibility when you can't do a quick Google search and find credible, mainstream links that clearly refute your claims.

AE911T constantly does press releases. They are just censored, which you can clearly see by the number of videos that get removed from YT.

Surely, you know this, right? Or, are you so delusional that the most obvious facts can't get through?
 
Last edited:
someone lost their dictionary -

A scam? Define scam, and how the WTC7 study fits the definition, please.

I'll wait right here.

Of course, you could argue against the substance of the report and documentary. Oh, wait, you can't because you didn't see the documentary.

Yet, here you are.

You have presented work that is a Scam. (aka, a dishonest scheme; a fraud)

Still waiting for your evidence?

Go ahead, present some substance of the report and documentary. Why can't you present substance?

You got the evidence, but you can't share it? Why come here and be exposed as a gullible 9/11 truth cult member who believes in the fantasy of CD?

Who did the CD? You got a list of who did it? No

You need to present the substance! It appears you did not watch the BS you are pushing...

No one need to watch the BS, you need to present the evidence. Your post is BS, and left out the substance of the BS put out by Gage and his delusional group of nuts.

You have present the case, no one here needs to watch the BS, you need to present the substance... can you do it? nope

What is the summary? CD? lol
 
Still, no Pulitzer - guess there is no evidence

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...ntradicts-official-conclusions-301029854.html

https://canada.constructconnect.com...-building-did-not-collapse-due-to-fire-report

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/university-report-9-11-building-180400328.html

http://www.newsminer.com/test3/univ...deo_970dc3b4-b840-5d9b-a3bd-14d499b35ee6.html

https://www.c-span.org/video/?320748-5/washington-journal-architects-engineers-911-truth

Come on, beachnut. Quit pretending to have credibility when you can't do a quick Google search and find credible, mainstream links that clearly refute your claims.

AE911T constantly does press releases. They are just censored, which you can clearly see by the number of videos that get removed from YT.

Surely, you know this, right? Or, are you so delusional that the most obvious facts can't get through?
oh noes, you are censored... lol,

Wow, and you have no Pulitzer? lol, you are gullible

Did you team with a newspaper to apply for the Pulitzer like they did for Watergate? You could be like woodward and bernstein... what is stopping you?

Is there no Pulitzer Category for fiction, or woo?

Yes, there is, you could apply for the Pulitzer in Fiction... go for it

With the massive support of Gage's less than 0.1 percent of all world engineers who signed a bogus petition, or joined AE nuts... what is stopping you from doing more than fooling conspiracy theories who blindly repeat the BS claims... ?

The best part of the BS news sources you posted, are the comments posted by idiots who believe the BS... sad to see so many gullible conspiracy theorist, like our president. When will you post evidence and proof for CD? clue, never
 
Last edited:
... I'm just gonna LOL in advance...
Guffawed too soon. When you are up to putting your own ideas in your own words and defending your own reasoning, you might get a hearing, depending of course on whether or not you have a firm grasp of facts and reason. Until then, LOL indeed!!!
 
no claim made, no substance in your post...

From AE911T - https://www.ae911truth.org/news/721-new-film-seven-available-today-on-multiple-streaming-platforms

I'm just gonna LOL in advance at the fauxgenineers who are gonna come out of the woodwork and try to discredit this. Well, the few that are left. Most of the debunkers and con artists have left this site because even they can't stand to continue to peddle the BS they have been for the past decade, or they have been kicked off the gubbamint payroll.

Great job TSz, and everyone else at AE911T. My only suggestion would have been to spend more time dumbing down the NIST lies so the average American could understand, but it's still an amazing achievement.
Did the film finally figure out there was no damage to WTC steel from thermite or silent explosives?

You posted BS from Gage's conspiracy theorist hangout, and failed to present substance, or a claim. You posted PR, and advertisement for woo...

Where have you been for a year? Is Gage going to cure Windmill cancer?

Did you get banned from https://www.metabunk.org/home/ ? yet?

This post would be against the rules there, because you presented no claim, as if you have no clue what is in the new film.

You have wasted a year, and fall for Gage's fantasy CD again - you could have taken a course in fire engineering/science, and learned the claim "fire can't/didn't cause the collapse of WTC 7" is false, based on the believers ignorance.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom