Serious scholarly support for Bush?

[Skeptic]

I would really need to see hard data for that assertion before I took it seriously.

The "90% of everything is crap" was not a serious statement, I was quoting what's known as "Sturgeon's law", after the science-fiction author. But the serious point is that there IS serious scholarly support for Bush in serious journals AND in books--I gave a few examples--and it's easier to compare journals.

 

[Ion]

WildCat talks about stupidity, with an acknowledgment of his stupidity:

I did contest your "accomplishments". I can't prove my allegations - that you're not a scientist or a world-class swimmer since I don't even know your name. But you're clearly stupid, you proved that all by yourself. This thread for instance, not a single post of yours addresses the subject,...
...

 

[WildCat]

WildCat talks about stupidity, with an acknowledgment of his stupidity:

Idiot wind, blowing every time you move your mouth,
Blowing down the backroads headin' south.
Idiot wind, blowing every time you move your teeth,
You're an idiot, babe.
It's a wonder that you still know how to breathe.

 

[Jocko]

WildCat talks about stupidity, with an acknowledgment of his stupidity:

Ion, it seems you never manage to squeeze out a single one-line post without an "edited by..." reference beneath it. Are you a lousy typist, or just a friggin' moron?

 

[Ion]

...
Are you a lousy typist, or just a friggin' moron?

I am a foreigner, English is not my first language.

I told you this, so you are the frigging moron, not me.

 

[Ion]

(snip)

A poem to Cat's idiocy.

 

[Ion]

I think this thread evidences the lack of scholarly support for Bush's presidency.

Bush is a moron President, presiding over a nation of mostly morons, many exposed by me in this thread.

However, Bush gets lots of attention in the cartoons sections instead.

Attention like this (which depicts his tragic behavior in the world):

 

[DialecticMaterialist]

The "90% of everything is crap" was not a serious statement, I was quoting what's known as "Sturgeon's law", after the science-fiction author. But the serious point is that there IS serious scholarly support for Bush in serious journals AND in books--I gave a few examples--and it's easier to compare journals.

You gave magazines, not journals. And the authors you gave provided very narrow support, one of them being a strict originalist viewpoint with regards to court (which may not necessarily be support for Bush), and another being a radio show host who's come into some hot water as of late.

 

[Beerina]

I cannot beleive people are responding to ION. By his posts I judge his age to be no more than 15. By his responses maybe 10.

Oh ya!

Hehe, I was thinking the same thing. A 15-16 year old boy who gets beat up a lot, thrilling in newfound emotional certaintism, beaking off like a similarly aged and experienced hyper-religious kid.

The casual factoid-dropping cross-references about Bush "destroying" the economy belie an attitude and cultural-fantasized worldview that would, rhetorically speaking, be best described as rabid.

 

[Ion]

Hehe, I was thinking...

You think now, Pee?

Since when?

 

[Ion]

I still don't find scholarly support for Bush, but I keep finding mocking cartoons of Bush's tragedies, good for resident morons that I expose here (i.e.: Pee, Chicago_Projects_Cat, L.A.'s grandpa, Abysmal -er, peptoabysmal-, Edone -er, Ed-, Shinytop_Slob&Bald, Jocky, etc.) to ingurgitate:

Happy chewing of what you choose to have and be, U.S. morons.