• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

September Stundie Nominations

Travis

Misanthrope of the Mountains
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
24,133
We are now past the month of Augustus. And now we enter the month of the seven headed arch-bird god of blood Septemboraptor (please don't correct me with the real meaning of the name I'm trying to plant the seeds for a new comic book line). And with that I now urge you all to start nominating Stundies in this thread before the unholy condor descends on you to separate you from your skin.

What is a Stundie? It's a humorous statement that is very wrong. Usually these are related to conspiracy theories but lately we've branched out into general science and logic. Keep them short and sweet if you can.

So go get them and don't forget to provide a link.
 
Patrick1000 is on a roll. Apparently the Apollo 11 bird was not only fake, but was also lost even before the launch.

So Professor Wampler wrote to me himself and confirmed he was given Tranquility Base's exact coordinates. This was done many hours before the launch. All that time, the Eagle was said by the Mission Control staff, the astronauts and the PR people to have been lost, at least semi-lost.

It must be a typo, but he didn't correct it even though I asked him about it (and got answers) a couple of times.
 
Last edited:
Alexis111 on the David Icke forum claims any radio is impossible beyond low Earth orbit, making Apollo a fake but also geostationary satellites. He has claimed (in other previous posts) that geostationary satellites are faked with an array of networked switching satellites in low orbit. Never mind the fact that hundreds if not thousands of satellites would be needed for EACH geostationary satellite to even begin to try that.
Here's his explanation of why radio communication is impossible.
For the benefit of those readers unfamiliar with the elements that make up my deep space telemetry signals denial (DSTSD) I will re-elaborate this idea in the simplest terms possible-

My claim is that no radio or telemetry signals can cross the fields of intense ionizing radiation that make up the magnetosphere enveloping our planet and protecting it from the vilest of the cosmic radiations especially those arising from our close proximity to a big active star.

My theory starts in a comparison with a vintage technology known as the electronic vacuum tube amplifier. In the simplest of terms a vacuum tube of the variety used in antique tvs and radios and electronic testing equipment.

At its most basic form the vacuum tube has what are known as a cathode, an anode (basic diode arrangement), and a control grid (amplification arrangement).

These electrodes are enclosed in a glass tube with solid base anchoring the electrodes and providing an airtight link with the outside circuitry and supply voltage.

The air in the glass tube has been evacuated and a partial vacuum created.

The cathode is an electrode usually located in the middle of the tube and is electrically insulated from the other electrodes within the glass tube.

The control grid surrounds the cathode and the anode surrounds them both. They are electrically insulated by a partial vacuum.

The operation in the simplest terms looks like this:

-an electrical potential is fed to the cathode. The cathode has a heating element inside its sleeve and the cathode is coated with a substance favoring electron populations.

When an opposite electrical potential is applied to the anode the electrons boiling off the cathode are drawn by electromotive/electrostatic force through the vacuum to the awaiting anode and the current starts flowing.

When an electrical potential is applied to the control grid, depending on its polarity will either stop or limit the flow of electrons (the amplification idea).

So, the control grid, depending on the polarity of its electrical potential can allow electrons to pass or stop them completely cutting off cathode-to-anode trans-vacuum current. The electrons travelling within a vacuum are extremely susceptible to these influences.

Now, again in the simplest terms, we transpose this basic principal of electronics to the theory that no radio signals can pass the earth's ionizing fields of intense radiation.

The radio signal leaving the earth based transmitter is much like the electron leaving the cathode.

Deep space telemetry can be seen as the electron's voyage through the vacuum tube of space (a far more effective vacuum).

The earth's magnetosphere can be viewed as the control grid tearing apart any radio signal leaving earth.
http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060174092&postcount=88
 
Someone in the last couple months posted a quote to the effect that "evidence is just slave talk" and encouraged readers to think outside the "box" of observable reality.

That quote, if I recall correctly, came from one of our "friends" at DIF.

Quite the wellspring of stundie-ness over there.
 
So all those amateur satellite photographers who take pictures of geosynchronous satellites have all been lying to us?

http://home.clara.net/robertkeddie/Astro/geo.htm

According to him yes. He's one of the bigger nuts on the Icke forum. He also believes all nuclear power and weapons are faked. Nuclear subs use some kind of heat exchange engine he never fully explains. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were coordinated attacks with massive amounts of snuck in TNT. I wish I were joking.
 
And all those giant radio dishes were built for show. Scientists at Arecibo have been sitting around playing gin rummy for decades.

Steve S

I don't remember exactly but a while back someone asked him about that and he said they were just listening to the noise of the "searing radiation hell" that is all deep space beyond LEO.

He claims it would be too hot on the Moon, counter with the fact that it takes time to heat things up and he just calls you a "Sun's energy denier". The guy's a real piece of work.
 
Got a doozie for you on DAY ONE!!

I'll hilite the stundie.

Awesome.

And now we have a really great one. You said "2. You said, in an earlier post "free fall speed".
Anyone who says "free fall speed" immediately disqualifies themselves from the ranks of the competent."

Let's see what NIST says shall we? "In Stage 2, the north face descended at GRAVITATIONAL ACCELERATION, as the buckled columns provided negligible support to the upper portion of the north face. This FREE FALL DROP continued for approximately 8 stories or 32.0m (105ft), the distance traveled between times t=1.75s and t=4.0s.
 
I'm not much into physics, but something tells me he won't understand the problem, and I don't have the patience to teach him anything about it.

ETA: Told you.

In regards to freefall speed, or freefall acceleration, I'm a little puzzled by that. I mean did you expect it to reach terminal velocity? I'm really not sure what you could have meant.


You forgot to highlight the part of the NIST report that says FREE FALL drop.
 
Last edited:
Another one from Peter Nolan. When you read this remember that Nolan is a FOTLer so he thinks paying taxes is voluntary making everyone in a country complicit in what its leadership does:
http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/08/30/result-of-hearing/#comment-106887

In an OPENLY DECLARED WAR, which this actually is, one can not murder an enemy combatant. In case you missed it? When wars are declared whole nations call killing people from other nations “good”. Indeed. Do I need to remind you the US just ran another aggressive war of conquest in Libya while “the west” watched their TVs?

It would be PERFECTLY LAWFUL for Ghadaffi to call on muslims in the west to kill christians right now. Why? Because ALL the citizens of NATO countries and the US who have not DENOUNCED THEIR CRIMINAL GUVMENTS or are PAYING TAXES TO CRIMINAL GUVMENTS are complicit in the war of aggression that just happened in Libya….and Iraq, and Afghanistan. They were ALL wars of aggression lead by the biggest criminal nation in the world today…the US…at the behest of their masters.

Now. I have written in my claim of right that I reserve the right to use force, up to and including deadly force, to defend myself and those my creator places in my care.

The US Supreme Court in the 1800s agrees with my position.
 
In an OPENLY DECLARED WAR, which this actually is, one can not murder an enemy combatant.
False on its face. Obviously you can murder an enemy combatant. It's called a war crime.
 
Richard Dawkins has called for Evolution to be taught to 5 year olds. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/01/richard-dawkins-evolution-children-five?INTCMP=SRCH
Readers of the Daily Mail have responded in predictable fashion.

"Darwin's vile book of 1859 was followed by the murder of up to 15m people in the Belgian Congo, followed by all of the various genocides of the twentieth century - probably more than 100m in total. There were atrocities committed before 1859, but very few on a comparable scale to what has happened since. Presumably Richard Dawkins wants more genocide to occur in the future."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Professor-Richard-Dawkins.html#ixzz1WjQ55Ogy
 
Richard Dawkins has called for Evolution to be taught to 5 year olds. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/01/richard-dawkins-evolution-children-five?INTCMP=SRCH
Readers of the Daily Mail have responded in predictable fashion.

"Darwin's vile book of 1859 was followed by the murder of up to 15m people in the Belgian Congo, followed by all of the various genocides of the twentieth century - probably more than 100m in total. There were atrocities committed before 1859, but very few on a comparable scale to what has happened since. Presumably Richard Dawkins wants more genocide to occur in the future."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Professor-Richard-Dawkins.html#ixzz1WjQ55Ogy

Gosh! Makes ya proud to be british. :p
 
Another one from Peter Nolan. When you read this remember that Nolan is a FOTLer so he thinks paying taxes is voluntary making everyone in a country complicit in what its leadership does:
http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/08/30/result-of-hearing/#comment-106887

It would be PERFECTLY LAWFUL for Ghadaffi to call on muslims in the west to kill christians right now. Why? Because ALL the citizens of NATO countries and the US who have not DENOUNCED THEIR CRIMINAL GUVMENTS or are PAYING TAXES TO CRIMINAL GUVMENTS are complicit in the war of aggression that just happened in Libya….and Iraq, and Afghanistan. They were ALL wars of aggression lead by the biggest criminal nation in the world today…the US…at the behest of their masters.


Err... why only Christians? :confused:

Still, it's good to know that, even though I pay my taxes, I'm exempt from retaliatory execution.
 
Alexis111 on the David Icke forum claims any radio is impossible beyond low Earth orbit, making Apollo a fake but also geostationary satellites. He has claimed (in other previous posts) that geostationary satellites are faked with an array of networked switching satellites in low orbit. Never mind the fact that hundreds if not thousands of satellites would be needed for EACH geostationary satellite to even begin to try that.
Here's his explanation of why radio communication is impossible.
For the benefit of those readers unfamiliar with the elements that make up my deep space telemetry signals denial (DSTSD) I will re-elaborate this idea in the simplest terms possible-

My claim is that no radio or telemetry signals can cross the fields of intense ionizing radiation that make up the magnetosphere enveloping our planet and protecting it from the vilest of the cosmic radiations especially those arising from our close proximity to a big active star.

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060174092&postcount=88

Is this guy aware that sunlight is a form of electromagnetic radiation?
 
One could clog the entire stundie thread chock-full-O-nutz with stuff from just one thread at Icke.

Here's another, from ianw:

There is an atmosphere of gases bellow the rocket caused by previous bunt fuel as this is what the plume pushes against to drive the craft. This is a turbulent gas cloud that does not qualify as a vacuum, and is a result of the engine.

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060179265&postcount=174

Oddly, his comment that there is an "atmosphere of gasses" below the ship is vaguely correct. Pity, it doesn't help the point he was attempting to make. Nor does he account for the rapid dispersal of said gasses into vacuum.

But the thrust pushing against the plume causing the craft to move? Geez. Explaining stuff like that over and over again was what caused me to quit that place.
 

Back
Top Bottom