September Stundie Nominations

TheLoneBedouin said:
Sword of Truth shows us that its okay to generalize- as long as you're generalizing about truthers.
Click to expand...
Links are both helpful and required by what we might, with some claim of accuracy, call the rules fo Stundilishiosity...
 
Drudgewire said:
And any evidence he's incorrect beyond "the gubmit is evil?"
Click to expand...
One thing I learned in my days as a carnie fund-raiser: always take the mark's entry fee even if he doesn't have a chance of finishing the race.
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
Bobert gives us a civics lesson on why our government works.
Click to expand...

TheLoneBedouin said:
Sword of Truth shows us that its okay to generalize- as long as you're generalizing about truthers.
Click to expand...

TheLoneBedouin said:
According to CHF, an example of anti-semitism.
Click to expand...



Well, so much for that faint hope.



Metullus said:
I thought that he was being facetious. I plead stroke related dementia...
Click to expand...


If only TLB could plead the same.
 
Metullus said:
Links are both helpful and required by what we might, with some claim of accuracy, call the rules fo Stundilishiosity...
Click to expand...

I'll step in and offer TLB a hand here, if I may?

Here is the thread where I made the statement TLB nominated.

If you believe my post is Stundielicious, if you believe my acknowledgement of my mistake at the bottom of the page and again on the 2nd page of the thread do not sufficiently diminish the initial error, then I encourage you to vote your conscience.

I am "Sword_of_Truth" and I approve this message.
 
Metullus said:
I thought that he was being facetious. I plead stroke related dementia...
Click to expand...
Not facetious at all. Whether or not AFP is anti-semitic is not the point. Does citing an anti-semitic source in any context make you an anti-semite?
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
Bobert gives us a civics lesson on why our government works.
Click to expand...

TLB,
Generally speaking when you are at the front of the class trying make a point and no one gets it that says more about you then then class.
Nice try but you failed miserably.
images
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
"Scholar" SDC enlightens us on the meaning of "historical revisionism":
Click to expand...

AZCat said:
You need to provide a link to the nomination.

No linky, no nom.
Click to expand...



It would be this post:

SDC said:
GregUrich, "revisionism" means Holocaust denial. It is not about correcting actual facts (e.g., when Browning's "Ordinary Men" appeared and elaborated on the routine murderousness of a German reserve unit in Poland, it was not "revision"). The people who talk about "revision" are deniers. If you don't believe me, well, look it up. Or ask Nick Terry, who is a historian of the Holocaust, just as you are an engineer.
Click to expand...



You'll note of course that TLB has expanded SDC's comment from "revisionism" to "historical revisionism", which would seem to be an unwarranted broadening of the point SDC was making.


And of course, it's not actually funny.








Sigh.
 
Horatius said:
You'll note of course that TLB has expanded SDC's comment from "revisionism" to "historical revisionism", which would seem to be an unwarranted broadening of the point SDC was making.
Click to expand...
I didn't expand anything. SDC was replying to a post by GregoryUrich about historical revisionism in general.
GregoryUrich said:
Being a jew, it's hard for me to imagine why you are so incensed about this. Historical research and revisionism is legitimate when supported by evidence. If you have a valid issue with any revisionist you should take it up with them.
Click to expand...
Horatius said:
And of course, it's not actually funny.
Click to expand...
Cuddles' criterion required stupidity, not necessarily humor.
 
Last edited:
a point of a confusion may lay in how the link is given

for example, this quote contains a link:

TheLoneBedouin said:
Why? No one else has to?
Click to expand...

this one doesnt:

TheLoneBedouin said:
Why? No one else has to?
Click to expand...


the little red arrow is a clickable link back to the original post, you can get this by using the quote button below a post, rather than just copying/pasting the text and wrapping quote tags around it

if the post is in another thread you can just copy and paste the entire quote that is placed into your post, then just dont submit the post
 
Last edited:
TheLoneBedouin said:
Why? No one else has to?
Nevertheless, Bobert's is here.
CHF's is here.
Click to expand...

Yes, they do. It's in the rulez. They used to be posted at the beginning of each Stundie nomination thread, but that practice seems to have fallen by the wayside.

Oh, and screenshots are acceptable, especially if you're nominating from forums where one must be a member to view certain posts or if you believe the post is not long for this world.
 
TheLoneBedouin said:
Why? No one else has to?
Click to expand...


Nominations taken from the JREF Forums have
viewpost.gif
next to the name. If you click on that image, it takes you right to the post that was quoted.

If you want to quote a post from another thread, click on the
multiquote_off.gif
image at the bottom-right of that post, then come to this thread and post a reply. Just below the message box, you'll see "You have selected 1 post that is not part of this thread. Quote this post as well, or deselect this post." Clicking on "Quote this post as well" will automatically insert the quote into the message box with all necessary formatting.
 
Last edited:
lapman said:
There is no evidence whatsoever that explosives were present. The audio record proves this.
Click to expand...
Logical fallacy: Invalid Argument.

(Note: Lapman was refering to Nist's argument of the form-

Explosive/Explosion of X magnitude is needed for global collapse.
Record shows there was no such explosive/explosion.
Therefore, explosives/explosions played no role in the collapse).
 
Last edited:
TheLoneBedouin said:
Logical fallacy: Invalid Argument.

(Note: Lapman was refering to Nist's argument of the form-

Explosive/Explosion of X magnitude is needed for global collapse.
Record shows there was no such explosive/explosion.
Therefore, explosives/explosions played no role in the collapse).
Click to expand...

Humor ur doing it rong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom