"SEND HER BACK!" Will they defend this?

[Cabbage]

and because you allege it, I must be guilty right?

Not at all. I am the one pointing out that, from context, what Brennan was saying was that it's not his place to impugn someone's character before official indictments come down. You, on the other hand, are the one persisting in deliberate obfuscation in a lame effort to score political points.

Clear now, son?

 

[Red Baron Farms]

Not at all. I am the one pointing out that, from context, what Brennan was saying was that it's not his place to impugn someone's character before official indictments come down. You, on the other hand, are the one persisting in deliberate obfuscation in a lame effort to score political points.

LMAO score political points? for who? from who? who who?

Points? POINTS? we don't need no stinking points!

 

[Delphic Oracle]

LMAO score political points? for who? from who? who who?

Points? POINTS? we don't need no stinking points!

I'll have what he's having.

 

[Cabbage]

LMAO score political points? for who? from who? who who?

Points? POINTS? we don't need no stinking points!

Points against the liberals you've already acknowledged you hate.

Why must you make this difficult??? Is it sincere ignorance or merely feigned? LOL!

 

[Red Baron Farms]

Points against the liberals you've already acknowledged you hate.

Why must you make this difficult??? Is it sincere ignorance or merely feigned? LOL!

You want to get serious instead of acting the parts of fools? Fine.

"Hypocrisy is the contrivance of a false appearance of virtue or goodness, while concealing real character or inclinations, especially with respect to religious and moral beliefs; hence, in a general sense, hypocrisy may involve dissimulation, pretense, or a sham."

Name first what "real character or inclination" is being concealed by my alleged false appearance of virtue or goodness.

Then give evidence that it is indeed a false appearance of virtue.

I am pretty damn sure not once in this whole series of posts did I ever do any virtue signalling, nor try to play the "Oh My I am so offended by these unwashed masses" card.

I simply found it hilarious how many of you in your desperation to prove Brennans words irrelevant, you are actually doing what you are arguing against! It's surreal and very hilarious that even being told it, you just cant stop.

eta hate is a strong word. there are very few people on this planet i actually hate. not one of them is due to being a democrat.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Any sane person knows she really did not marry her own brother, and the chances she faked it with paperwork for some sort of immigration fraud is diminishingly small too. It's absurd political mudslinging.

I think you may be underestimating the ferverentniss of some people's beliefs. I don't think all the right-wingers who post in this section of the board can be insincere trolls.

Like trying to prove someone is a racist by being a racist yourself.

You think that people pointing out that Brennan's views* cannot legitimately be ascribed to the entire US left-wing is the same thing as claiming that it actually can? Either you're still not explaining yourself very clearly, or what you're trying to explain is nowhere near as logical as you think it is.

*Conceding for the sake of argument that those views are being accurately represented

 

[Red Baron Farms]

You think that people pointing out that Brennan's views* cannot legitimately be ascribed to the entire US left-wing is the same thing as claiming that it actually can? Either you're still not explaining yourself very clearly, or what you're trying to explain is nowhere near as logical as you think it is.

*Conceding for the sake of argument that those views are being accurately represented

LOLZ no I could care less about what Brennan's real views are. I simply find it absolutely hilarious that in the fervent zeal to prove Brennan's statement is not true or if true doesn't apply to the left in general, some are indeed acting in a manner that makes his statement at least appear true! It's funny actually.

 

[Cabbage]

You want to get serious instead of acting the parts of fools? Fine.

"Hypocrisy is the contrivance of a false appearance of virtue or goodness, while concealing real character or inclinations, especially with respect to religious and moral beliefs; hence, in a general sense, hypocrisy may involve dissimulation, pretense, or a sham."

Name first what "real character or inclination" is being concealed by my alleged false appearance of virtue or goodness.

Then give evidence that it is indeed a false appearance of virtue.

I am pretty damn sure not once in this whole series of posts did I ever do any virtue signalling, nor try to play the "Oh My I am so offended by these unwashed masses" card.

I simply found it hilarious how many of you in your desperation to prove Brennans words irrelevant, you are actually doing what you are arguing against! It's surreal and very hilarious that even being told it, you just cant stop.

eta hate is a strong word. there are very few people on this planet i actually hate. not one of them is due to being a democrat.

As I have already explained, Brennan's words are irrelevant due to the fact that they are being misrepresented. Conservatives do this consistently, so please stop whining like a bitch simply because I called you out on it.

And I guess I misquoted you: You said you despise liberals, not hate them.

My bad. LOL!

 

[Cabbage]

LOLZ no I could care less about what Brennan's real views are. I simply find it absolutely hilarious that in the fervent zeal to prove Brennan's statement is not true or if true doesn't apply to the left in general, some are indeed acting in a manner that makes his statement at least appear true! It's funny actually.

Yeah, we know! The misrepresentation was all you were ever interested in. LMFAO!!!

 

[johnny karate]

OMG! It clearly and obviously doesn't! That's the absurdity of the whole thing! D'oh!

Bogative knows this! So do you and I. This is really getting absurderer and absurderererer by the moment!

A joke intended to lampoon the hypocrisy of the left that is premised on something the left doesn’t actually do isn’t a joke.

It’s a butthurt conservative flailing around in the vicinity of what he thinks a joke is supposed to be.

 

[johnny karate]

I notice instead of calling everyone you consider a nazi a conservative "a RAYcis!" (like most of the locals do), it's now "conspiracy theorist". You show 'em, I'm sure it's mortifying to them!

I’m not sure how else to describe people who promote conspiracy theories, but I’m open to suggestions.

 

[smartcooky]

Wrong again! lolz you have to be actually trying to be this completely clueless. Enter the twilight zone.

It does not help to relentlessly mock people who don't understand something.

No matter how I slice it, I just cannot see what is supposed to be funny in what Bogative said. His post merely came across as ignorant, stupid, and technically incorrect.

I guess it must be one of those "you had to be there" moments, or maybe some form of American humour that non-Americans don't have the upbringing to understand.

Even with your explanations, I am still not seeing anything funny.

 

[bruto]

I’m not sure how else to describe people who promote conspiracy theories, but I’m open to suggestions.

I can think of a few but forum etiquette precludes them.

 

[I Am The Scum]

Impotently flailing while making absolutely no god damn sense is the standard of the right. Good job, RBF.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

LOLZ no I could care less about what Brennan's real views are. I simply find it absolutely hilarious that in the fervent zeal to prove Brennan's statement is not true or if true doesn't apply to the left in general, some are indeed acting in a manner that makes his statement at least appear true! It's funny actually.

Then what you're describing is not a joke by Bogative, but reactions to Bogative's statement that tickled you. This cat gif is funny:

That doesn't imply that the kitten was pretending to be tired as a joke.

Besides, there were 3 posts by people other than you and Bogative between Bogative's post and your post referencing it as being "a joke" and "a zinger of a point":

Could you at least try to make sense? Form a coherent set of thoughts?

Now leaving Tinfoilhatville, next stop Doubledownberg! All aboard!!

I like how an off-the-cuff remark that Brennan made during a panel discussion morphs into a “left-wing standard”.

It shows just how desperate Trump apologists truly are.

Because we all know how much they respect due process:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DQCiIIeN0Bw

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-etUhjXgMbA

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l9TL-Jo2nwQ

Can you quote the parts of those posts in which people, in their "fervent zeal to prove Brennan's statement is not true or if true doesn't apply to the left in general", are "acting in a manner that makes his statement at least appear true" and explain how those quotes are examples of people acting as if someone being accused of a crime is the same thing as them being guilty?

 

[Red Baron Farms]

Can you quote the parts of those posts in which people, in their "fervent zeal to prove Brennan's statement is not true or if true doesn't apply to the left in general", are "acting in a manner that makes his statement at least appear true" and explain how those quotes are examples of people acting as if someone being accused of a crime is the same thing as them being guilty?

No. I am finished with this pointless explaining about why it was funny. If you can't understand it then just drop it and so will I too.

If you can't let it go like some obsessive Xanax addict, then I am still dropping the subject because you have no chances of ever getting it.

There is literally no point and I never saw so many insecure people worried about why someone was amused in my life. I'll keep that in mind for the future. No laughing from me if you are not onboard with it.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

No.

Yes, I didn't think you could. You know why? Because it didn't happen.

I snipped all the "I totally could explain it, but after waffling on incoherently for 2 pages about it I've suddenly decided that it's beneath me, but I totally could if I wanted to but I don't" excuses, because they're irrelevant.

 

[pgwenthold]

A joke intended to lampoon the hypocrisy of the left that is premised on something the left doesn’t actually do isn’t a joke.

It’s a butthurt conservative flailing around in the vicinity of what he thinks a joke is supposed to be.

It's only being called a joke because it didn't land.

If this had been said at a rightwing echo chamber, no one would be calling it a joke, nor defending it as ine.

 

[johnny karate]

No. I am finished with this pointless explaining about why it was funny. If you can't understand it then just drop it and so will I too.

If you can't let it go like some obsessive Xanax addict, then I am still dropping the subject because you have no chances of ever getting it.

There is literally no point and I never saw so many insecure people worried about why someone was amused in my life. I'll keep that in mind for the future. No laughing from me if you are not onboard with it.

Making an attempt to be coherent is also an option available to you.

 

[I Am The Scum]

It's only being called a joke because it didn't land.

Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner.