• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Sen. Marco Rubio is fighting fact-checking battle... against the right-wing GOP

MattusMaximus

Intellectual Gladiator
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
15,948
Rubio Targets Fellow Conservatives on Immigration

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., is running a campaign-style press operation to push an immigration overhaul, a fitting move for a politician who needs it to bolster a rumored 2016 presidential bid.

Rubio’s Senate office has adopted a rapid- response strategy similar to Obama for America’s vaunted 2012 tactics. The Florida Republican’s team, however, is focused on taking down what it believes to be rampant misinformation about a bipartisan immigration bill crafted by the senator and seven of his colleagues.

Rubio’s office has sent 14 “Fact vs. Myth” emails since April 17, including four that went out on April 18, when fellow GOP Sens. Jeff Sessions of Alabama and David Vitter of Louisiana held a rival news conference around the same time that the “gang of eight” introduced its bill. Rubio’s office declined to say how many staffers are working on the rapid response team, but a Republican source said there are eight aides helping with the effort.

In form, the emails look a lot like OFA’s incessant “FACT CHECK” missives that shed light on some of the 2012 campaign’s most important issues. In content, the multiple-times-per day emails have called out prominent conservative politicians, pundits and media outlets: Sessions, Vitter, The Daily Caller, The Washington Times, RedState, Breitbart, The Wall Street Journal, Ann Coulter, Mickey Kaus and Michelle Malkin...

Ah, nothing like watching the frothing right-wing of the GOP/Tea Party eat itself.

:popcorn1
 
Call me cynical (or don't bother - I admit to it) but I wouldn't be surprised if this was an organized stunt to make Rubio seem more appealing to the center. Since immigration reform gets at least lip service from nearly every politician needing to court the Hispanic vote (which includes every presidential candidate) and since Rubio is a child of immigrants who would be expected to be sympathetic to same, it's a perfect issue where he can look like a "maverick" without alienating the Republican power players. After all, he's been happy enough to vomit up Republican talking points on every other issue.
 
I can't believe this news.

All this time I've been assured that the Republicans, especially the "right-wingers", are monolithic, lock-stepping (and goose-stepping LOLOL), hive-minded drones with a severe case of "epistemic closure".

Is it good to have debate within a political party... or not?

Are those who claim that "I would REALLY like to see the Republicans change so that we can have a SENSIBLE opposition party, the way things are SUPPOSED to be humba-humba word salad blah blah"... just concern trolls after all? Or maybe they think that changing platforms within a party is something that just happens magically overnight with no debate.
 
Personally, I'm happy to see Rubio step up. Unfortunately, it seems that he's going to have more than an uphill battle against his own party on this one. I think it is going to hurt him as far as his 2016 aspirations go, at least in the GOP primaries.
 
Personally, I'm happy to see Rubio step up. Unfortunately, it seems that he's going to have more than an uphill battle against his own party on this one. I think it is going to hurt him as far as his 2016 aspirations go, at least in the GOP primaries.
I disagree. Assuming he continues to toe the line on every other issue, fiscal and social, he'll remain electable in the primaries. Romney brought socialized health care (not really) to Massachusetts as a governor while still making the Republican cut his second time around, and I think immigration reform isn't an issue that'll turn off the Republican base like spending, taxes, abortion, marriage equality, etc.

When it comes right down to it, I think the 2014 and maybe the 2016 elections will depend on which party succeeds in shifting the blame for government deadlock to the other.
 
I disagree. Assuming he continues to toe the line on every other issue, fiscal and social, he'll remain electable in the primaries. Romney brought socialized health care (not really) to Massachusetts as a governor while still making the Republican cut his second time around, and I think immigration reform isn't an issue that'll turn off the Republican base like spending, taxes, abortion, marriage equality, etc.

When it comes right down to it, I think the 2014 and maybe the 2016 elections will depend on which party succeeds in shifting the blame for government deadlock to the other.

Isn't this the problem though? Getting the nom requires pulling in a different direction required to get the pres?
 
Call me cynical (or don't bother - I admit to it) but I wouldn't be surprised if this was an organized stunt to make Rubio seem more appealing to the center.

Awww. I'd criticize this cynicism if it wasn't called for.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom