• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.
Loveland Frogman

Here is an interesting article on Snopes about the Loveland Frogman.

http://www.snopes.com/2016/08/05/loveland-frogman-spotted-again/

Part of the problem with "cryptid" sighting reports relate to how bungled or mixed up the accounts may be as reported and over time. Consider the following from the article:

"[Officer] Matthews explained that the first officer to encounter the purported Frogman, Ray Shockey, called him one night in the March of 1972* after spotting something strange on Riverside Drive/Kemper Road near the Totes boot factory and the Little Miami River.

"'Naturally, I didn't believe him … but I could somehow tell from his demeanor that he did see something,' Matthews said.

"Later that month, Matthews was driving on Kemper Road near the boot factory when he saw something run across the road. However, it wasn't walking upright and didn't climb over the guardrail as the urban legend of the Frogman goes. The creature crawled under the guardrail. Matthews said he 'had no clue what it was.'

"'I know no one would believe me, so I shot it,' he said.

"Matthews recovered the creature's body and put it in his trunk to show Shockey. He said Shockey said it was the creature he had seen, too.

"It was a large iguana about 3 or 3.5 feet long, Matthews said. The animal was missing its tail, which is why he didn't immediately recognize it.

"Matthews said he figured the iguana had been someone's pet and then either got loose or was released when it grew too large. He also theorized that the cold-blooded animal had been living near the pipes that released water that was used for cooling the ovens in the boot factory as a way to stay warm in the cold March weather.

"'The thing was half dead anyway when I shot it,' he said."
 
So it looks like biologists are not expecting to find a Thylacine, but are using this infusion of money to fund a survey of Cape York fauna, under the guise of Thylacine search.

That's what I read into that.
 
So it looks like biologists are not expecting to find a Thylacine, but are using this infusion of money to fund a survey of Cape York fauna, under the guise of Thylacine search.

That's what I read into that.
It sounds that way, but it does appear that, despite their doubts, they intend to look seriously for it, just noting that the research will be useful either way.
 
There has been no doubt that large pythons could kill adult humans.

However, within herpetology circles, it has been promoted that no python could actually eat one of the humans it has killed. Even National Geographic has said on it's shows that the jaws could not extend beyond the shoulders.

There was a show a few years ago, where a man in a metal suit 'attempted' to get eaten without success.

Which brings me to this horrific article:
http://metro.co.uk/2017/03/28/villa...hon-to-find-their-dead-friend-inside-6539420/

It could very disturbing to some people, but it seems to show an adult human consumed by a large reticulated python.

Parcher? Do you think this is legit? I think it's the real deal. Once they found him, they stopped the procedure to call the authorities is what it looks like to me.
 
It seems legit. I have seen nearly identical photos from about 15 years ago of a person removed from a python.

Indonesians are generally not big people. These pythons eat deer and pigs which are probably larger than humans.
 
According to this article the Night Parrot was rediscovered 4 years ago. https://www.theguardian.com/environ...western-australia-for-first-time-in-100-years
Rediscovered in a new area, 4 years ago.
There had been an earlier sighting in 1979, with a dead specimen found in 1990, confirming that the bird was still extant.

The 2013 sighting by Young is contentious, as he has a track record of "finding" extinct/rare birds but offering up little evidence (the Night Parrot included), e.g., "Young is not notifying state or federal authorities of the identity of the private grazing property where he found the birds. He insists that the conservation of the night parrot is his primary concern and he intends to raise at least $2 million so the property can be managed privately. Rights to his photographs and video footage are up for sale."

He is probably most famous for his 2006 claim that he had discovered a new species, the Blue-fronted fig parrotWP. There are serious doubts about the photo he finally provided, there was evidence of Photoshopping. He has not produced any physical evidence for this bird in the intervening 11 years, it seems.

Yes despite that, it seems that the Night Parrot is indeed extant.
It live in actual, remote, uninhabited (by white fellahs) and massive areas in the middle of nowhere in Australia. Not quite the same as other sightings of Bigfoot in suburbia and plesiosaurs in Loch Ness.

I'm not holding my breath on the Thylacine sightings though.
Very sceptical on that given the "evidence" presented so far. Nearly as bad as that for the Ivory-billed Woodpecker. Similar conservation acquisitions were made for its proposed habit too, I remember, and not a bird found in 10(?) years.
 
Night Parrot

...Yes despite that, it seems that the Night Parrot is indeed extant.
It live [sic] in actual, remote, uninhabited (by white fellahs) and massive areas in the middle of nowhere in Australia. Not quite the same as other sightings of Bigfoot in suburbia and plesiosaurs in Loch Ness.
...
PhD student Nick Leseberg’s passion for the night parrot, a cryptic and nocturnal species from arid Australia, has won him one of two inaugural environmental fellowships from the Australian Academy of Science.

Mr Leseberg from UQ’s School of Earth and Environmental Sciences has won has won a Max Day Environmental Science Fellowship Award, valued at almost $19,000, to study night parrots...
After the parrot’s rediscovery, Bush Heritage Australia quickly established Pullen Pullen Reserve in western Queensland to protect that population of birds...​
 

Back
Top Bottom