Seeing Cryptids: The Problems

[LTC8K6]

I guess ole foot hasn't yet shown up for an HD camera...

Pity...

Oh wait, we already have a claim from Chris of HD video taken in early 2010, don't we...

From 15 feet away...

 

[LTC8K6]

http://www.bfrpky.com/newmuvee011.wmv

Note the alderfoot tracks in this video, folks.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

I'm trying to point out that you're claiming brush and a dark spot is a bigfoot group encounter? Great observation skills.

Sounds like you really want to see bigfoot in the woods.

You are confused or you are purposely trying to tie two separate videos together to cause confusion.

The fresh pine bough break was filmed in January 2011, that's the first clip you listed in your post.

The hillside family group video was filmed March 2010, that's the second clip listed in your post.

At no time have I claimed the fresh pine bough break was a Bigfoot family group. Please get your facts straight. It was the beginning of a brush pile structure that was constructed during the following Spring.

These two videos are both shot at area "F" but quite some time apart.

Chris B.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

Yes it is obviously the same location a couple of years later with a fresh pine break. I still monitor this same area and it's the same area Cervelo has seen. Is there some point you're trying to make? Is this your attempt at an aha moment? lol. Try again. Chris B.

Edited to add: Actual time between videos was 11 months on this one, not 2 years as I had previously stated. I mistook the video in your post for a latter one. Sorry for the mistake, I was unable to add the info directly to the post. Chris B.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

http://www.bfrpky.com/newmuvee011.wmv

Note the alderfoot tracks in this video, folks.

Nope, that's a Blue Springs Creek casting. Chris B.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

I guess ole foot hasn't yet shown up for an HD camera...

Pity...

Oh wait, we already have a claim from Chris of HD video taken in early 2010, don't we...

From 15 feet away...

Yes and it's not uploaded to my website. Sorry. Chris B.

 

[EHocking]

...
It's amazing. Why does he even carry any cameras at all?
...

A camera has a date/time display and he doesn't carry a watch?

 

[RayG]

How would you reach the same conclusion?

No matter how you start out, unless someone lays a new bipedal species at your feet, you should always conclude that it wasn't bigfoot.

Funny thing is, I could talk with that same guy and determine if he actually had seen a bear or a Bigfoot.

How do you determine whether the person is telling the truth?

RayG

 

[Night Walker]

Some here also seem to have Bigfoot research tied together with Bigfootery. The difference is staggering between the two.
Chris B.

Hi Chris - how would you define and differentiate the terms "Bigfoot research" and "Bigfootery"?

The argument that Bigfoot is a social construct is interesting. What would the purpose serve to use Bigfoot as a social construct?

I know you didn't ask this question of me but I think the most obvious function of "Bigfoot = social construct" is that it simply brings joy and a sense of mystery to people (usually enthusiasts) in the same manner as ghosts and UFOs do to ghost- and UFO-researchers...

 

[River]

Yes and it's not uploaded to my website. Sorry. Chris B.

Why not show it Chris? Holding out for cash? Why the secrecy?

 

[River]

You are confused or you are purposely trying to tie two separate videos together to cause confusion.

The fresh pine bough break was filmed in January 2011, that's the first clip you listed in your post.

The hillside family group video was filmed March 2010, that's the second clip listed in your post.

At no time have I claimed the fresh pine bough break was a Bigfoot family group. Please get your facts straight. It was the beginning of a brush pile structure that was constructed during the following Spring.

These two videos are both shot at area "F" but quite some time apart.

Chris B.

So one shows a brush pile and the other shows a group of bigfoot, but they both appear to look the same? The bigfoots are hiding in the brushpile? What are you trying to elude to? It's a freakin brush pile. Certainly nothing in the imagry to indicate any animal what-so-ever, much less a non existent bigfoot.

How much time per year (days/hours) do you put into this bigfoot hunting in the woods Chris? I'm curious how much time you actually spend in the forest.

 

[River]

Hi Chris - how would you define and differentiate the terms "Bigfoot research" and "Bigfootery"?



I know you didn't ask this question of me but I think the most obvious function of "Bigfoot = social construct" is that it simply brings joy and a sense of mystery to people (usually enthusiasts) in the same manner as ghosts and UFOs do to ghost- and UFO-researchers...

The reason I did not answer this question before was I won't assume why people do this. I think it's silly and dishonest. Ohhhh the boogie man! I'm scurd! There are many real things in this world that are very cool. No need for imaginary beasts in the woods to have fun in nature.

 

[Night Walker]

The reason I did not answer this question before was I won't assume why people do this. I think it's silly and dishonest. Ohhhh the boogie man! I'm scurd! There are many real things in this world that are very cool. No need for imaginary beasts in the woods to have fun in nature.

You mean you won't assume why people get into Bigfoot other than it is "silly" and "dishonest", right?

Engaging with one's imagination is a wonderful thing! Admiring nature is fine but it is even better when we creatively engage with it...

 

[River]

You mean you won't assume why people get into Bigfoot other than it is "silly" and "dishonest", right?

Engaging with one's imagination is a wonderful thing! Admiring nature is fine but it is even better when we creatively engage with it...

Don't misquote me. I said "I think it's silly and dishonest". Not that the reason people get into bigfoot is BECAUSE it is. I will disagree with you on the "even better" remark too. It's better when it's real and honest. (as with most things in life, not just bigfoot!)

 

[Resume]

Bigfoot is not real? You keep telling yourself that.
Chris B.

It's a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world
except for footie.

 

[tsig]

Why not show it Chris? Holding out for cash? Why the secrecy?

He signed an NDA with bigfoot?

 

[Resume]

Admiring nature is fine but it is even better when we creatively engage with it...

I'm a pretty creative guy and I like nature just fine the way it is when I'm out in it. You can make up some pretty awesome challenges just by experiencing the reality of it: winter camping where just staying warm is a job; wilderness kayaking where just staying on the right side of the water is a chore; free-climbing; orienteering (with a compass); fly-fishing; bowhunting; surfing . . . none of which requires a non-existent 9-ft, 600-lb ape.

Conversely, Blaarging requires footie, but not nature. At least no more than you can experience from the tailgate of your pick-up in the middle of a two-track on your mother-in-law's third-growth 80, pounding Natty-Lights and puffing Swisher-Sweets.

 

[Mudcat]

He signed an NDA with bigfoot?

Makes sense to me.

 

[carlitos]

after having the hillside family group encounter, with captured video,

Your video does not depict a "family group encounter," unless your own family was around behind the lens.

Funny thing is, I could talk with that same guy and determine if he actually had seen a bear or a Bigfoot. I've done it before. Chris B.

Bears have the benefit of actually existing, though.

it's simply too ridiculous, irrational, and moronic a discussion to participate in.

Dude, it's a discussion about bigfoot and other imaginary creatures. Of course it's ridiculous and irrational.

 

[tsig]

Makes sense to me.

Also since he signed an NDA not to talk about the NDA he can't tell you about it but if we apply footie researcher logic we can see that the lack of admitting an NDA is the same thing as admitting an NDA so we know bigfoot is real because you can't sing an NDA with a non existent creature.


Q...E...D