This requires all kinds of special pleading and just-so argumentation. There is a process for habitat and species nomination for protection. I have posted the link to USF&W's process for example, but it is true on all levels of government: Federal, State, and Local. Not only that, but PRIVATE societies as well like Nature Conservancy, Izaak Walton or whatever.
The fact they strain so hard to ignore that these processes and organizations exist is proof that they know bigfoot is BLAARGing. They do not speak with wildlife managers, with archaeologists, with biologists and etc. that are swarming over all of these alleged bigfoot habitats.
You are not doing your job of acknowledging the overwhelming evidence of all these highly informative behaviors at the same time they are making this claim of wanting to protect habitat. Most of their actions are in contradiction to, not in support of preserving habitat.
Oh sure, we are to believe they relegate the "study" specifically to people with no background in the pertinent sciences? The contradictions are like a Mt. Everest here. Your argument requires this extremely stylized special case, and an irrational one, to agree with.
This, my friend is where you have jumped the shark:
This straw man is the last straw. You have seen a parade of us all emphatically stating NOBODY is of the belief they are ALL liars. So why do you trot out a straw man like this?
To say you are "not one" means you are distinguishing yourself from people who are. Well just name them. There aren't any.
And start naming the people who you claim fit the description above. So we may see your evidence. We have this BLAARGer from Kentucky before us. Is he your evidence of someone who believes?
We do not have an assumption that people are BLAARGing. It is only after sufficient proof like this Ky. fellow has showered us with that we can state with such high confidence that he has proven it to us.
It is a straw man to say that we pre-suppose. No, we watch actions. We let those actions speak to us instead of the chain-yanking/trolling or whatever you want to call it.
