To all quoted posts above:
Please find another member to attack and ridicule. I'm not interested in the insults as it is clear that's the only thing many here are capable of is personal attack.
You have become somewhat confused. What you quoted were examples of people demonstrating your statements to be wrong. That is not an attack, nor is it ridicule. If you can't handle disagreement, may I suggest you find something else to do with your time other than discussing biology? Biology--and science in general--is built on disagreement.
Sure, I've seen a Bigfoot. What else do you want? It's not up for debate
You don't get to set the terms of hte conversation. I don't doubt you THINK you saw bigfoot. I doubt your capacity to interpret what you saw.
Descriptions, pics and skull models based on a piece of jaw bone.
Yeah.....care to imagine just how accurately you can determine fleshy bits of extremities based on jaws? "Not at all" doesn't begin to come close to how poorly such reconstructions are constrained by data.
Well, my wife simply didn't check all my pockets. Just like the loggers didn't check every forest in Michigan.
"Well, you didn't check behind every tree
at the same time! Bigfoot may have moved!!!"
Is there some reason I need to reveal my personal background and education achievements and degrees? I don't even know your name. Why the interest in my personal information?
Because it's relevant. You say that you've compared Giganto with bigfoot. Well, in order to do that you must have the necessary knowledge to make an accurate comparison. I've studied fossils my entire adult life, and I don't have the necessary background to do so; it's a HIGHLY specialized skill, particularly with hominins. If you lack that skill, your interpretations are nothing more than fantasy. The easiest way to establish your capacity to do this sort of thing is to prove that you were trained in it. You could also demonstrate the skill by utilizing it--providing specific characters that are similar, for example--but you've reacted with unwarranted hostility to the suggestion that you do that, so training is what you're left with.
You said you can do X. We want proof. Otherwise, we are obliged to simply take your word for it--the word of someone who has demonstrated a deplorable lack of honesty in this thread. "Because I say so" is never strong evidence, and particularly not when it comes from someone who engages in as much word-twisting as you.
To be clear: what you're doing is beyond the leading experts in the field. Paleo illustrators have a devil of a time getting animals right when they have all the bones; when they just have mandibular and skull material, they are helpless. What you're saying you can do is the equivalent of saying you can built a wormhole in your back yard using spare parts from your car.
