thaiboxerken
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2001
- Messages
- 34,537
More ammunition in support of my ability to read Biden's mind:
Biden opposed Robert's nomination, ok. How is that relevant?
More ammunition in support of my ability to read Biden's mind:
Biden opposed Robert's nomination, ok. How is that relevant?
You didn't even read the excerpt I provided, let alone the article did you? He didn't even allow a hearing. There was no consideration of the nomination at all, and many dozens of others.
So assuming all this is correct, and we can agree that Biden was wrong to oppose the nomination for no other reason than partisan politics, what's your point?
Let's not get ahead of ourselves. Are you conceding that the practice is well established, and that Democrats do it too? Is that what you mean by "assuming all this is correct"?So assuming all this is correct, and we can agree that Biden was wrong to oppose the nomination for no other reason than partisan politics, what's your point?
Let's not get ahead of ourselves. Are you conceding that the practice is well established, and that Democrats do it too? Is that what you mean by "assuming all this is correct"?
Let's get that clear, before we move on.
Once that's clear, we can move on to the question of whether it's wrong. Personally, I'm not sure it *is* wrong.
So assuming all this is correct, and we can agree that Biden was wrong to oppose the nomination for no other reason than partisan politics, what's your point?
How about Rubio campaigning to be the US senior pastor instead of president?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZ1zBODwGTk
It's false eqvivalence, as usual.
Again, there was no blanket denial to hear any candidate from Biden. There was a request for the president to consult the senate.
JFC, Marshall replaced by Thomas. That is all I have to say to you. We've already been governed by the most immoral among us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111!! Benghazi!!11They're hero's.
You libs have to understand, if your given this nomination our country will be changed for generations. Obama will not get another pick. I hope the repubs understand if they let Obama do this, they will start a violent revolution that cannot be stopped.
We will not be governed by the most immoral among us!!!!
You think one issue defines this? I'm one who couldn't care less about homo's have civil unions, its a lot more than that!
Half the country is right thinking, 2/3 of the states are republican. We have the House and the Senate, the country is clearly divided down the middle. Not really clear to you but people aren't going to stand by and allow the wholesale changes this court could have the power to force on people.
Personally I think its time for this country to split into smaller countries. I would do whatever it took to not be governed by socialist thinking people.
And yet you oppose access to sale, legal, termination services despite it being supported by a majority of USAians.Half the country is right thinking, 2/3 of the states are republican. We have the House and the Senate, the country is clearly divided down the middle. Not really clear to you but people aren't going to stand by and allow the wholesale changes this court could have the power to force on people.
I'm sure the "socialist thinking people" would be glad to get on with life unburdened by the drain of the red states.Personally I think its time for this country to split into smaller countries. I would do whatever it took to not be governed by socialist thinking people.
Half the country is right thinking, 2/3 of the states are republican.
You didn't even read the excerpt I provided, let alone the article did you? He didn't even allow a hearing. There was no consideration of the nomination at all, and many dozens of others.
And yet you oppose access to sale, legal, termination services despite it being supported by a majority of USAians.
![]()
I'm sure the "socialist thinking people" would be glad to get on with life unburdened by the drain of the red states.
You're still presenting the Democrat behavior as a hypothetical. I would like to get clear agreement from you that it is a fact, before we move on to the question of whether it's wrong.If it's wrong when the Republicans do it, then it's wrong when the Democrats do it, too. The reason why I think it's wrong is that it's just one more example of American politics where actually getting stuff done is secondary.
Gotta score those Internet points!You're still presenting the Democrat behavior as a hypothetical. I would like to get clear agreement from you that it is a fact, before we move on to the question of whether it's wrong.
You're still presenting the Democrat behavior as a hypothetical. I would like to get clear agreement from you that it is a fact, before we move on to the question of whether it's wrong.