• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Same missile?

A missile explosion is how the people died in the lobby of WTC 7.
Click to expand...


Do twoofers meet up for beers and try to "out-stupid" their old theories with new ones they make up on the spot?

Because really, wow...
 
MaGZ

Air to Air missiles leave a tell tale signature: white smoke/exhaust behind them, the Sidewinder's being a curly cue and the AIM-120 being more or less straight. Beyond the usual fact I noted to you months ago about an air to air missile being a pointless weapon for hitting a building, warhead miniscule compared to desired effect, if you claim the effect was destrucion of the building, you once again argue for evidence of something that isn't on your pet film.

Your film does not have any object presenting those visual characteristics I described above.

How many missiles have you ever fired?

How many have you been involved in firing?

How many have you seen fired, and watched them to intercept visually?

DR
 
Last edited:
funk de fino said:
I never failed to read it.

He experiences the second plane hit the tower and a few seconds later he hears an explosions to his right. This is the parts from the second plane which have escaped the tower and fall to earth. The track for them is in the picture I provided.

Which floor of the WTC7 and how could this not have been aircraft debri?

I suggest you provide the clip?
Click to expand...

I will repeat for you. The explosion of the second plane is above him: a second or two later there is a visible explosion to his right at WTC 7. This is caught on film as he falls to the ground and you see debris flying out from the building.

At this time parts of the plane were still above him and had not left WTC 2. So it was not the plane hitting the building. A plane hitting the building would not cause debris to explode outward.

From what I remember it was several stories above ground level. It was a brief view so there was not time to count the floors.
 
MaGZ said:
I will repeat for you. The explosion of the second plane is above him: a second or two later there is a visible explosion to his right at WTC 7. This is caught on film as he falls to the ground and you see debris flying out from the building.

At this time parts of the plane were still above him and had not left WTC 2. So it was not the plane hitting the building. A plane hitting the building would not cause debris to explode outward.

From what I remember it was several stories above ground level. It was a brief view so there was not time to count the floors.
Click to expand...

Provide clip please!
 
Darth Rotor said:
MaGZ

Air to Air missiles leave a tell tale signature: white smoke/exhaust behind them, the Sidewinder's being a curly cue and the AIM-120 being more or less straight. Beyond the usual fact I noted to you months ago about an air to air missile being a pointless weapon for hitting a building, warhead miniscule compared to desired effect, if you claim the effect was destrucion of the building, you once again argue for evidence of something that isn't on your pet film.

Your film does not have any object presenting those visual characteristics I described above.

How many missiles have you ever fired?

How many have you been involved in firing?

How many have you seen fired, and watched them to intercept visually?

DR
Click to expand...

I have never claimed the purpose of the missile hitting WTC 7 was to bring down the building. The missile was fired to bring down the second plane.

I have never fired any missiles. But I know what I saw and I know it could have only came from one of the fighters from Otis.

When the missile exploded on Vessey Street it created a huge white cloud of smoke. This is visible in the Naudet documentary in two examples.

One where the cameraman films the crash of the second plane at the corner of Vessey and Church (the film is cut and edited out because of the missile explosion), he then runs north on Church Street and eventually turns the camera back and catches the white smoke from the missile explosion.

The second example is from the Naudet brother on the first floor of WTC 1. After the second plane crash there is white smoke from the missile explosion at WTC 7 moving south across the plaza toward WTC 2.
 
MaGZ said:
I have never claimed the purpose of the missile hitting WTC 7 was to bring down the building. The missile was fired to bring down the second plane.

I have never fired any missiles. But I know what I saw and I know it could have only came from one of the fighters from Otis.

When the missile exploded on Vessey Street it created a huge white cloud of smoke. This is visible in the Naudet documentary in two examples.

One where the cameraman films the crash of the second plane at the corner of Vessey and Church (the film is cut and edited out because of the missile explosion), he then runs north on Church Street and eventually turns the camera back and catches the white smoke from the missile explosion.

The second example is from the Naudet brother on the first floor of WTC 1. After the second plane crash there is white smoke from the missile explosion at WTC 7 moving south across the plaza toward WTC 2.
Click to expand...



You did not see a missile hit WTC 7--no one did. No missiles were fired in the U.S. on the day of the jihadist attacks.
 
MaGZ said:
I don’t have a clip. The last time I saw the footage was on a Arab language channel called Mossaic on Link TV about three years ago.
Click to expand...

Ummmm...yeah...ok. You do realize that your "missle" claim is silly, right? Backed up with zero evidence and no eye-witnesses. You would think that somebody in NYC that day would have come forward.

I'll check in later to follow up on your progress of presenting evidence. Until then, I think you may want to spend less time defending a theory that carries as much weight as saying that large flatulent monkeys caused all the havoc that day.
 
pomeroo said:
You did not see a missile hit WTC 7--no one did. No missiles were fired in the U.S. on the day of the jihadist attacks.
Click to expand...

A CNN reporter live on the scene when the second plane hit reported that some people saw a missile.
 
MaGZ said:
A CNN reporter live on the scene when the second plane hit reported that some people saw a missile.
Click to expand...


At last you admit that absolutely no one saw a missile hit WTC 7. We already understand that anyone confusing Flight 175 with a missile was simply mistaken. Why have you wasted so much time with this foolishness?
 
The evidence

Evidence I have presented supporting the Missiles at Ground Zero:

Footage by Fox News taken by local cameraman. (To be discovered and released at a later date)

Footage of the second missile streaking across the plaza.

CNN reporter saying some people saw a missile.

Numerous calls into the police 911 saying they saw missiles shortly after the crash of the second plane.

Naudet footage of the white smoke from the missile hit. (Two examples)

Air traffic controllers saying the Otis fighters arrived just moments after the second plane crashed into WTC 2

Footage of one of the fighters in the area shortly after the second tower was hit.

Bob and Bri video saying they saw a military plane in the area after the second tower was hit.

Photos of WTC 7 on fire near the 12th floor with both towers still standing.

Barry Jennings claim he was in WTC 7 around 9:03 when he and Hess experienced a big explosion. (The missile hit)
 
Last edited:
I'm going to make my fortune Photoshopping missiles onto pix of the Twin Towers and selling the pix on shady street corners.

If I feel cruel, I will Photoshop MaGZ's portrait along with a menorah onto the grassy knoll and sell that too.
 
pomeroo said:
At last you admit that absolutely no one saw a missile hit WTC 7. We already understand that anyone confusing Flight 175 with a missile was simply mistaken. Why have you wasted so much time with this foolishness?
Click to expand...

The Fox cameraman and the Naudets have footage of the missile strike. They know this because they would have reviewed their footage taken that day.
 
Gurdur said:
I'm going to make my fortune Photoshopping missiles onto pix of the Twin Towers and selling the pix on shady street corners.

If I feel cruel, I will Photoshop MaGZ's portrait along with a menorah onto the grassy knoll and sell that too.
Click to expand...

Are you suggesting the ABC footage of the missile across the plaza is photoshoped?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom