Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Christopia

[Donal]

They'd debate over if it should be Julius Augustus etc etc

 

[Donal]

Also, reading the Constitution Party's official platform, I noticed a few glaring double standards. One of my personal favorites is that while they want to end all foreign aid and pull back all military force, they want to keep the Panama Canal.

 

[Travis]

Normally, when you endorse someone, you´re saying "This is the guy I´d like to win the election", and not "It doesn´t matter what the **** I do so I´ll just pretend to support a white supremacist fundamentalist nutcase who wants to tear the US apart".

Is - to use the most charitable interpretation - throwing a temper tantrum and acting like a raving lunatic whenever you don´t get what you want a quality you are looking for in a head of state?

Endorsing a candidate that seems to be in favor of huge crimes against humanity as part of a temper tantrum does not speak well of him.

 

[Ausmerican]

Endorsing someone who doesn't have a *********** chance no matter who it is, was better than endorsing Obama or McCain in 2008, yep.

See what I mean?

Nope. Totally DONT see what you mean.

Your preferred method of escaping culpability for any actions by the mainstream candidate that gets elected is: "Hey dont blame me, I supported the crazy white supremacist loving, lets go back to the gold standard, Christian, anti womens rights, civil rights were probably a mistake guy!"

Thats your preferred stance?

ETA: Given your 'logic' would you have supported David Duke over Obama or McCain if he had been running instead of Paul? Even if they dont have a chance of winning that doesnt change the fact you are supporting them and by proxy their views.

 

[Foolmewunz]

Endorsing someone who doesn't have a *********** chance no matter who it is, was better than endorsing Obama or McCain in 2008, yep.

See what I mean?

Massive fail, Oliver.

No, I don't see what you mean. If you choose someone without a rat's ass chance of winning, like writing in Mickey Mouse, that's a protest vote. If you choose to support a bigoted miscreant, that's not a protest vote. That's a statement. It says, "I support a bigoted miscreant". Ronulans have trouble seeing things that are right in front of them. How many more repulsive acts are you going to hand-wave away before you admit that your voice of the people is a fraud.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Wolf Blitzer? Diane Sawyer? Brian Williams? Anyone want to ask Dr. Paul about this? I mean there's only been, what, 74 debates so far and I don't think it's been mentioned once.

The media isn't liberal, it's incompetent.

 

[dc1971]

bla bla bla... was Ron Paul's goddamn choice for POTUS.

Was it a GODDAMN choice according to YOU or a GODDAMN choice according to Ron Paul?

 

[varwoche]

Here is Rawles' reasoning behind the borders of The American Redoubt. The inclusion of eastern OR/WA seems rather whimsical.

Utah (out): desert climate makes it unsuitable to feed its current population, much less one swelled by in-migration
Dakatoas (out): I have my doubts about how defendable they would be if ever came down to fight. Plains and steppes are tanker country. It is no coincidence that the armies of the world usually choose plains for their maneuver areas, for large scale war games.
Colorado (out): A few large cities call the political shots, and they have been assimilated by ex-Californians.
Eastern OR/WA (in): The population densities are suitably low, and the populace is overwhelmingly conservative, but the folks there are still at mercy of the more populous regions west of the Cascades, that dictate their state politics. But who is to say that their eastern counties won't someday secede?

 

[varwoche]

Imagine a POTUS who abhors cities.

This from Baldwin's article published on VDARE*, a white nationalist website:

Chicago is why the people in Illinois are losing their liberties; Baltimore is why the people in Maryland are losing their liberties; Atlanta is why the people in Georgia are losing their liberties; St. Louis and Kansas City are why the people in Missouri are losing their liberties; Dallas and Houston are why the people in Texas are losing their liberties; Los Angeles and San Francisco are why the people of California are losing their liberties; Portland is why the people of Oregon are losing their liberties; Seattle is why the people of Washington State are losing their liberties; Miami, Ft. Lauderdale, and Orlando are why the people of Florida are losing their liberties; Birmingham is why the people of Alabama are losing their liberties

*VDARE is named after Virginia Dare, supposedly the first white person born in the new world.

 

[Foolmewunz]

Was it a GODDAMN choice according to YOU or a GODDAMN choice according to Ron Paul?

It was a goddamn adjective, DC1971, not a goddamn theological treatise.

 

[WildCat]

Soooou? Mickey Mouse would have been a better choice than the rest of the pack in 2008. Oh, and this election cycle it doesn't look any better.

Mickey Mouse is a better choice than Ron Paul's pick. Or even Ron Paul for that matter.

 

[Foolmewunz]

Mickey Mouse is a better choice than Ron Paul's pick. Or even Ron Paul for that matter.

Yeah, people forget that Mickey is not that wishy-washy creepy character that they created for the TV show, but was actually quite the scamp, originally. If I was a conservative (damn, I nearly got palsy typing that!), I think I could get behind Mickey as a candidate.

 

[varwoche]

Pastor Chuck is a featured writer at nowtheendbegins.com.

Breakup Of United States Is Now Inevitable

Given that End of Days is upon us, I for one say ho-hum to geo-political turmoil.

Look at the images of Obama, shown with Mao, Lenin and is that Marx on the left? The second image is pretty funny too.

I’m supporting Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate.

 

[Foolmewunz]

Pastor Chuck is a featured writer at nowtheendbegins.com.

Breakup Of United States Is Now Inevitable

Given that End of Days is upon us, I for one say ho-hum to geo-political turmoil.

Look at the images of Obama, shown with Mao, Lenin and is that Marx on the left? The second image is pretty funny too.

I believe that's the cuddly Georgian (no, not Jimmy Carter) over on the left - Josef Stalin.

 

[Tricky]

Endorsing someone who doesn't have a *********** chance no matter who it is, was better than endorsing Obama or McCain in 2008, yep.

See what I mean?

Yes. Yes I do see. I now see what kind of person would, for any reason, actually vote for that piece of human excrement. Thank you for clarifying that picture.

 

[Tricky]

Pastor Chuck is a featured writer at nowtheendbegins.com.

Breakup Of United States Is Now Inevitable

Given that End of Days is upon us, I for one say ho-hum to geo-political turmoil.

Look at the images of Obama, shown with Mao, Lenin and is that Marx on the left? The second image is pretty funny too.

I’m supporting Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate.

Maybe Ron didn't actually read the platform. You know he's quite famous for signing his name to things he hasn't read.

 

[Travis]

Here is Rawles' reasoning behind the borders of The American Redoubt. The inclusion of eastern OR/WA seems rather whimsical.

Utah (out): desert climate makes it unsuitable to feed its current population, much less one swelled by in-migration
Dakatoas (out): I have my doubts about how defendable they would be if ever came down to fight. Plains and steppes are tanker country. It is no coincidence that the armies of the world usually choose plains for their maneuver areas, for large scale war games.
Colorado (out): A few large cities call the political shots, and they have been assimilated by ex-Californians.Eastern OR/WA (in): The population densities are suitably low, and the populace is overwhelmingly conservative, but the folks there are still at mercy of the more populous regions west of the Cascades, that dictate their state politics. But who is to say that their eastern counties won't someday secede?

Californians are the Borg. Resistance is futile bitches!

 

[Corsair 115]

Here is Rawles' reasoning behind the borders of The American Redoubt.

Well, at least he's not reaching beyond the 49th parallel. (Not on that map at any rate.)

 

[ponderingturtle]

Isn't "Biblically-sound and Constitutionally-sound" a contradictio in terminis?

(Or is he not referring to the US constitution?)

No they just read the constitution like they do the bible, it is all the word of god, you just have to ignore the sections that are wrong in both.

 

[Firestone]

No they just read the constitution like they do the bible, it is all the word of god, you just have to ignore the sections that are wrong in both.

Sad, but probably true.