Ron Agrees to Set Up a Debate Between 'omniadeo' and Mark Roberts?

[Walter Ego]

This may come as news to Ron and Mark. Sounds like there was an offer but no agreement.

From 9/11 Blogger.

In the AirAmerica comments section appended to the 5/22 Richard Greene show, I offered several polite challenges to Ron Wieck and one or two critiques of his arguments. I got the usual JREFer treatment in response; avoidance or misapprehension of my pointed questions and patronizing, smart-alecky comments. (To be fair, this type of behavior is too common on all sides of this and most other disputes on the internet.)

My comments can be found here: http://airamerica.com/clout/blog/2008/may/22/clout-thursday#comments

In the course of these exchanges, I offered to debate Wieck, Mackey, Roberts or whomever. Mr. Wieck responded with an acceptance to set up a debate with Mark Roberts. His exact words were, "An unknown, anonymous internet denizen wants to debate Mark Roberts? Sure you do. What's your name? Let's set it up."

After some soul searching and worrying about having to reveal his real identity on the internet and on TV, 'omniadeo' picks up the gauntlet.

In spite of Mr. Wieck's mocking tone, and the opinion of many I respect that such encounters with him are a monumental waste of time, I am quite serious about pursuing his promise to set up a debate. I am posting here, as a way to renew my challenge, and also as a way to explain why I, an unlikely candidate, feel qualified to do so.

At least he realized he was being mocked.

There’s more, some of it quite humorous, that you can read for yourself.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/15800

 

[pomeroo]

This may come as news to Ron and Mark. Sounds like there was an offer but no agreement.

From 9/11 Blogger.



After some soul searching and worrying about having to reveal his real identity on the internet and on TV, 'omniadeo' picks up the gauntlet.



At least he realized he was being mocked.

There’s more, some of it quite humorous, that you can read for yourself.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/15800

As I read his longwinded post, he is saying that he doesn't know a damn thing about anything. He wants to debate Mark on imaginary "destroyed" evidence. Boy, this sounds exciting.

 

[Walter Ego]

As I read his longwinded post, he is saying that he doesn't know a damn thing about anything. He wants to debate Mark on imaginary "destroyed" evidence. Boy, this sounds exciting.

Longwinded is right. I think his opening statement would up take the entire show.

So, Mr. Wieck and Mr. Roberts, in spite of my great respect for the proponents of alternative theories above, I will not come to debate as a proponent of any solution to the mystery of 911. You will not lead me down into the weeds of any conspiracy theory except the one you defend. We will not be sidetracked into discussions of the size of the holes in the Pentagon, sulfurous residues or what Silverstein meant by "pull." You will be led back from controlled demolition to controlled information and why it needs to be controlled. You will find yourself having to defend the destruction of evidence or forced to call for the censure and firing of those who destroyed it. You will find yourself defending lies and concealment or forced to call for revelation and investigation. You will defend the misdirection of public attention or become part of the movement to redirect it back to those remarkable improbabilities, without which many thousands of people would still be alive. Some will say that debating you is a waste of time. They may be right, but I do it to make a point about who bears the burden of proof in the consideration of 911 and its aftermath. One way or another, if you or Mr. Roberts dare debate me, I will make you a part of the 911 Truth Movement.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/15800

 

[Horace Wheeljack]

You do need an agreement going in to stay away from isolated statements of other "truthers" and minutia of scientific points. But it's Ron's Show.
Here is what I would propose - Ron - I am not far from NYC. I'll come down and buy you and Mark a nice dinner and we'll have an informal discussion to see what three intelligent and patriotic Americans can agree upon and agree to disagree upon, because I am curious.

http://airamerica.com/clout/blog/2008/may/22/clout-thursday?page=1

TopGunl is asking you and Mark out for dinner! He also admits to being curious, I'd be afraid Ron, very afraid.

 

[Finnegan]

http://airamerica.com/clout/blog/2008/may/22/clout-thursday?page=1

TopGunl is asking you and Mark out for dinner! He also admits to being curious, I'd be afraid Ron, very afraid.

Well, there's my heartwarming moment for the day.