• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Roman Polanski arrested (discuss)...


Yes, and this took place in 1986, almost a decade after the incident in LA. So, it does kind of indicate that the first incident wasn't just some "single mistake".

The incident did take place in France, so I'm not sure how exactly it relates to the U.S. case. (Also not sure if there's a statute of limitations in France that would keep her from pressing charges there.)
 
Michael Douglas seems to be wise enough to avoid the controversy:

Hollywood star Michael Douglas said Friday he will not sign a petition during the Cannes festival against Roman Polanski's extradition to the United States, despite his admiration for the director.... Douglas said that, despite his fondness for Polanski, it would not be right for him as an American to sign a petition in favour of someone who had broken the law and "jumped bail."
From: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hSjZf9QL_7UHRXqj7tNtzkzsL7jg

Good on you Michael. :)
 
However in this case:

But in the 1999 interview, Lewis said she had gone to bed with him of her own free will.

'He'd already cast me in his film Pirates, so it wasn't like it was a casting couch thing where you have to sleep with someone to get the part,' she said. 'I wanted him probably more than he wanted me.'

Lewis said she then seduced Warren Beatty, after Polanski made a wager with the American actor that he could not get her to sleep with him.

In the wide-ranging interview, Lewis also admitted that she had had paid sex with men at the age of 14.

'I don't how many men might have had sex with me for money,' she said. 'I was in a permanent haze. I was 14 and looking for excitement, yet I was so naive.'

Link
 
However in this case:
...in the 1999 interview, Lewis said she had gone to bed with him of her own free will.


Link

All I can say is... wow. Didn't she think that that sort of information might be, you know, sort of relevant?

So, what do people think the case is with Lewis?

- Misguided do-gooder attempting to serve justice by helping to get the 'bad' Polanski extradited (although doing so by lying)?
- Person attempting to whitewash their past?
- Person was being at least partly honest, and had actually been assaulted/taken advantage of by Polanski, but didn't didn't talk about it and put up a 'false face' by saying she was willing
 
All I can say is... wow. Didn't she think that that sort of information might be, you know, sort of relevant?

So, what do people think the case is with Lewis?

- Misguided do-gooder attempting to serve justice by helping to get the 'bad' Polanski extradited (although doing so by lying)?
- Person attempting to whitewash their past?
- Person was being at least partly honest, and had actually been assaulted/taken advantage of by Polanski, but didn't didn't talk about it and put up a 'false face' by saying she was willing

I honestly have no idea.

It could be that she was abused but felt that it was necessarily to project a 'man-eater' image to advance her career.
It could even be that she 'modified' the memory of the event and convinced herself that she was an active participant instead of coerced.
It could be that she was a total slut back then and now that her acting career has ended is cynically using the situation to gain attention or damages.

Human psychology being irrational, illogical and almost infinitely complex, who knows?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom