catsmate
No longer the 1
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 36,758
Evidence?Given that a sizeable portion of 9/11 'truthers' are Islamists or Islamic scholars in Middle Eastern countries and elsewhere,
Evidence?Given that a sizeable portion of 9/11 'truthers' are Islamists or Islamic scholars in Middle Eastern countries and elsewhere,
Ah, a Willie Rushton reference....I was thinking of the Vilebastard* twins.
*Pronounced "Villibart".
Syd was actually a Roger.
You can't teach me anything; I once fly posted for Blackhill Enterprises.
Guy Pratt was bass player with Pink Floyd from 97 to 22 when they packed it in.Absolute bollocks, as proven by the case Waters took against Pink Floyd.
Waters thought he was Pink Floyd, and he clearly and legally was not. 3 against 1 won, and rightly so.
As David Gilmour said at the time "Bass players are ten a penny" and A Momentary Lapse of Reason proved that correct.
Gilmour also offered an olive branch in the '90s, which was accepted and is why the band was able to play songs from The Wall after. The reason they're now again estranged is entirely because Waters is an antisemite, conspiracist dickhead.
This is like arguing that a particular person isn't an alcoholic because there are other people who drink regularly without it becoming an addiction. And no one is saying that Barrett permanently became a "basket case" through his excessive (even by the standards of others in the '60s counterculture scene) use of psychedelics, only that while he was doing so he was unable to function as a musician, either writing or performing.Lots of people in that era took loads of psychedelic drugs without becoming basket cases.
You are even more clearly completely unqualified to make that assertion. Surely you've noticed that the seriousness with which others regard your abilities is an inverse function of the seriousness with which you regard them yourself. Again, Barrett's own family have stated that he was not mentally ill. He didn't spend the rest of his life as a "basket case". He may have been bitter about the way his tenure with the band ended, but he was the one who chose to trip balls so often during that period that he couldn't function in that role at all.Barratt was clearly an undiagnosed schizophrenic, IMV (Brian Wilson was also obviously mentally ill).
You certainly don't know.Maybe the drugs triggered it off and pushed him over the edge, who knows?
As were all the members of Pink Floyd. They were all a part of that London counterculture scene.but Barratt was 'arty' before then: typical art student with eccentric tastes in decor and arty/trendy clothing, always a little weird...
Yeah, they said "let's get rid of Syd so we can make commercial pop albums like Ummagumma and Atom Heart Mother".We can't blame the band for snubbing Barratt because after all kerching-kerching super group fame is sure to turn most people's head and 'sell out'.
He didn't quit Pink Floyd, he unilaterally announced that he was ending it, like it was entirely his property. The other three didn't agree. I think his estrangement from all three other members has more to do with him being an ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ than anything else.To give Waters credit, he did quit Pink Floyd in 1985 because he thought it 'creatively finished'. So now he and Dave Gilmour are completely estranged.
This is like arguing that a particular person isn't an alcoholic because there are other people who drink regularly without it becoming an addiction. And no one is saying that Barrett permanently became a "basket case" through his excessive (even by the standards of others in the '60s counterculture scene) use of psychedelics, only that while he was doing so he was unable to function as a musician, either writing or performing.
And you still haven't provided evidence for the supposedly bad treatment he got from his band-mates, who, as already mentioned, made sure he continued to get the royalties from the first two albums that supported him financially.
You are even more clearly completely unqualified to make that assertion. Surely you've noticed that the seriousness with which others regard your abilities is an inverse function of the seriousness with which you regard them yourself. Again, Barrett's own family have stated that he was not mentally ill. He didn't spend the rest of his life as a "basket case". He may have been bitter about the way his tenure with the band ended, but he was the one who chose to trip balls so often during that period that he couldn't function in that role at all.
And, just out of curiosity, how are you at diagnosing narcissistic personality disorder?
You certainly don't know.
As were all the members of Pink Floyd. They were all a part of that London counterculture scene.
Yeah, they said "let's get rid of Syd so we can make commercial pop albums like Ummagumma and Atom Heart Mother".
He didn't quit Pink Floyd, he unilaterally announced that he was ending it, like it was entirely his property. The other three didn't agree. I think his estrangement from all three other members has more to do with him being an ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ than anything else.
Vixen is whatever suits her weird narrative at the time she posts, Nailing jello to the wall best describes trying to get a consistent narrative from that one.Uhhhh, "we psychologists"? Did I miss something? I'm pretty sure @Vixen claimed to be an accountant, not a psychologist.
She became an accountant after completing a psychology degree, which makes her, apparently, a psychology postgraduate.Uhhhh, "we psychologists"? Did I miss something? I'm pretty sure @Vixen claimed to be an accountant, not a psychologist.
You claimed you were a "psychology postgraduate." What exactly do you mean by that?
"Name calling"? Are you serious? You are the one who posted "we psychologists", so how exactly is it "name calling" when the name you are being called on is a name you claimed for yourself?
So you weren't complaining about being called an accountant, which (for context) was what you were described as in the post immediately above your complaint about name-calling? It wasn't possible to "click back" because you hadn't quoted the post you were responding to.If you click back, you'll see the post I was responding to. Everything has a context.
For the avoidance of doubt, a poster asked; And, just out of curiosity, how are you at diagnosing narcissistic personality disorder?
I had no idea Smock perceived the word to be an insult.So you weren't complaining about being called an accountant, which (for context) was what you were described as in the post immediately above your complaint about name-calling? It wasn't possible to "click back" because you hadn't quoted the post you were responding to.
If it's intended to be an insult, the term usually used is "bean-counter".I had no idea Smock perceived the word to be an insult.
Uhhhh, "we psychologists"? Did I miss something? I'm pretty sure @Vixen claimed to be an accountant, not a psychologist.
Vixen is whatever suits her weird narrative at the time she posts, Nailing jello to the wall best describes trying to get a consistent narrative from that one.
She became an accountant after completing a psychology degree, which makes her, apparently, a psychology postgraduate.
You claimed you were a "psychology postgraduate." What exactly do you mean by that?
Because I have two chartered accountancy designations, both classified as masters degrees.
So I am a postgraduate whichever way you look at it.
Perhaps my trusted interpreter @Mojo can explain it to you. He's my communication go-between.@Vixen, the above posts were immediately between two posts by you. The first post by you said nothing about name calling. The second post by you started with you imploring the group "Can we quit name-calling and get back to the topic of Roger Waters and his 9/11 CT support?", which would lead one to assume the name calling took place sometime between your two posts.
So, pray tell, which one of the above quoted posts were you referring to when you requested an end to the name calling, and exactly what name do you think you were called?
Hamfisted dodge noted.Perhaps my trusted interpreter @Mojo can explain it to you. He's my communication go-between.
So, yes, Waters is a bit of a ◊◊◊◊ supporting Putin and perhaps lacks good taste and sensitivity, but I can't see that his 9/11 beliefs are 'anti-Semitic'.
“They needed a Pearl Harbor, but who’s the ‘they’? Israel possibly had something to do with it. Elements possibly in the United States government,” he said.
Smock, do you have any scintillating insights into the thread's topic?Hamfisted dodge noted.