"Now I made mention of a darker looking car parked near the back of the parking lot in the apartment building location"
Darker than? IN this case he is covered, he mentioned two cars earlier, so no matter what color the car is he can say it was " darker" either than most cars, or than the other car.
"The second vehicle I envisioned was a van a lighter color van that was the primary vehicle in the kidnapping of Jodi and was also seen in this area prior to her being taken. When I make mention of (being seen or witnessed) it is from the premonitions I am getting of people seeing this happen or take place."
Notice how he does not say the car, but " the primary vehicle" so if the car is found to be darker, he still has an out by saying " well that wasn't the primary vehicle" .
"I make mention of the fact of two bridges, one just off in the distance from the primary bridge area that would have a steal “A” frame look to it with beams and concrete base(s) as part of the structure with water (not overly deep) but also a cement culvert or water way gate of sorts. The numbers of 367 or 376 come in loud here as part or whole in a bridge number or reference to that area. "
So a generic bridge, gotcha, i am sure there are not many of those out there. And what is 367, an are code, some grafitti, the weight of the person who took her? This is not information.
"I also make a real demand that the fact a function was attended by both Jodi and one of the individuals had happened just prior to this occur race taking place. I make mention of the fact this should be revisited and names should be looked at again."
A psychic standard. This function could be a party, a fundraiser, whatever. And if neither party would know, he would just say that they went to the same party and neither knew.
"I also make mention of the fact the “LAND LINE OR HARD LINE” phone logs should be accessed here to see the day before the function or social gathering they both were at prior to her disappearance be looked at or if they have looked at once more. I strongly feel the fact of seeing the one individual was making sure in ways she was going to attend this function and that he would also. There were actual calls to her work from this person from various phones as if he knew about tracing."
Oh, check the phone records, that is brilliant. I am sure that the police, if they found the function, would not have done this. From what i hear police have yet to search someones phone records to solve a case.
"I feel this individual is a repeat offender in crime as such where stalking, compulsive disorder, and possible murder once before has taken place. The names of those who were in attendance at these social functions in the last week and a bit for Jodi should be re-examined and backgrounds be checked to see more important information."
Very safe bet, he is saying if it is a person who did it, they probably committed some crime before. Really? So your saying someone who murdered a girl could possible have had a rap sheet? Robbie thomas keeps the useful relevant information coming.
And looking into who knew her, wow, Robbie is completely changing the face of how policework is done.
And finally when is ocd a crime? I mean, to the best of my knowledge it is a disorder, not a legal issue.