Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rob says on Facebook "Here's the order which resulted in the email sent by arayder being released to me. ".

Is there anything that can be posted that indicates the order was in fact not signed/denied? Those two items paired together would imply fraud, I think.
 
On a more serious note, it appears as if Menard is attempting to or has succeeded in bluffing and bullying the West Vic Community Centre into releasing information by pretending that this draft order is real.

Or at least he says that's what he did in the caption to the image. Who knows? What a tangled web he weaves...

Menard is can’t keep his stories straight.

First he tells us the court ordered the email released to him (we see now that that’s a ding dang lie). Then, in bong haze, he tells us he has the email only by putting a ruse over on a program manager at the Victoria West Center.

No, poor Bobby has only the copies of the emails I sent him out of courtesy.

Menard should know that the program manger, who simply sent my original email up the line, would not conceivably have forwarded the emails in question, now part of his phony civil suit, on to him no matter how he fantasizes his big swingin‘ phone **** might have gotten her to do him right.

Then Bobby tells us his mythical Sam Spade is awaiting the emails he, Menard, says he already has in order to track down all us defendants. Mind you now, Fez boy told us all months ago he had us in his cyber-sights owing to the league of dedicated momma’s basement key board techo-warrior freemen he had at his disposal.

Dang, Bobby, you need better stories!
 
Last edited:
Rob says on Facebook "Here's the order which resulted in the email sent by arayder being released to me. ".

Is there anything that can be posted that indicates the order was in fact not signed/denied? Those two items paired together would imply fraud, I think.

The scan of the order that he posted is clearly not signed. He says "have to get it signed and filed" as if that is just a technicality. The court registry has a record of the hearing on November 23, but has no record of an order issued.

I'd say the chances of it being real are very slim. Not completely impossible, but very slim.
 
So he's trying to get a copy of the email sent to West Vic. Ok, but I thought someone said earlier that they had been forwarding him copies of this correspondence already. And previously he mentioned he had copies of a letter to West Vic. So what information is he trying to get through this order that he doesn't already have?

LordEd - If your application is denied there is no order generated saying so. It might appear on the court procedure record as an appearance with an application denied. But it wouldn't necessarily prove that this was the order he was seeking. Essentially a draft order is prepared in advance just to make the process easier if the judge grants it. It doesn't get filed with the court. If the application is denied you just throw it away. Unless of course you're Menard...

The court registry has a record of the hearing on November 23, but has no record of an order issued.

It should be recorded as such if an order was made as far as I know.
 
Last edited:
Menard is can’t keep his stories straight.

First he tells us the court ordered the email released to him (we see now that that’s a ding dang lie).

Yep, Bobby wrote:

An order to release an email sent to The Victoria West Community Centre has been secured and the offender identified as '*********'.

fez boy is an out and out liar.
 
It should be recorded as such if an order was made as far as I know.
It's a little bit ambiguous. The only documents available to be downloaded are the Notice of Claim and the Notice of Application. The result of the hearing is recorded as "Appearances ended" (paraphrasing by memory here). There is no clear indication of what happened.

But if the Master signed the order, why post an unsigned copy?
 
But if the Master signed the order, why post an unsigned copy?

If the master signed it why would you even have an unsigned copy? Your copy would now be signed. I guess you could go print out a new unsigned draft for some reason...
 
If the master signed it why would you even have an unsigned copy? Your copy would now be signed. I guess you could go print out a new unsigned draft for some reason...
I don't know how things work in BC. I suppose we can't totally discount the possibility that his application was successful but he didn't have a properly drafted order at the hearing so the Master told him to go away and draft it then bring it back to be signed.

Seems unlikely to me, but I can't be 100% sure.

Still doesn't explain why he wants the court to order someone to give him a copy of emails he already has.
 
Last edited:
I guess that was my original question which I had kind of forgotten about. If he already has these emails, why is asking for the court to order someone to give him copies of them?

Because the possibility you present could be correct assuming he showed up for court without any draft order, then was granted the order, then went back and drafted it, posted it to the internet saying the order was granted but before he went back to get it signed. That could have been what happened.
 
It's on his facebook page. He also openly admits that it hasn't been signed.

Screenshot here:

http://i.imgur.com/T0K4U.jpg?1
.

I'd hate go all old-style Menardian but:

1/ The document refers to one "Robert Menard"
It can't be relevant to Robert-Arthur: Menard then surely?

2/ John Doe has informed me that his name is not "Defendant".
Can you prove otherwise?

3/ Seagulls are noisy and have big beaks.
Can you prove that custard isn't the invention of a 17th Century wizard?
 
".... also if gravity is an attraction of mass why if i stand at the side of a great mountain am i not drawn side-wards it, ..."


Well, I certainly hope no one mentions the existence of gravimeters and gravity gradiometers to him!



It's on his facebook page. He also openly admits that it hasn't been signed.

Screenshot here:

http://i.imgur.com/T0K4U.jpg?1

ETA: The hearing with Master McCallum occured on Nov 23 as indicated. It did not result in a signed order.


Oh lord, one of his commenters is O'Neil Brooke, our local candidate for the Crazy Party in several recent elections!


ETA: and why would the "PI" need the hardcopies of the e-mail? Wouldn't electronic versions be far more useful in tracking down the sender?
 
Last edited:
Oh lord, one of his commenters is O'Neil Brooke, our local candidate for the Crazy Party in several recent elections!

You've blinded me with science, as the now late Patrick Moore once said.
(You have to be British and old to get that)

Your linky for O'Neil Brooke points to... sciencey stuff.
I was wanting crazy party numptys :)
Fix it or be prepared to be JB-ernated. :p
 
ETA: and why would the "PI" need the hardcopies of the e-mail? Wouldn't electronic versions be far more useful in tracking down the sender?

Because bloodhounds need to sniff an actual object in order to get the scent.
 
Maybe this latest plan of Menards is to futher reduce his audience demographic.
Anyone with a single brain cell will now be able to see Menard for what he really is and he knows this, so his ever more ludicrous plots and schemes are designed to reduce the gene pool even more.
I think his next seminar will probably be at a care home full of alzhiemers patients.
Although his perfect client would be the character in the film "Memento" with Guy Pearce.
 
I sent e-mails to the newspaper that reported on the Lance Thatcher case with details about Menards nefarious activities, I also copied Menard in on them so he would know they were sent.
The mails I sent included a mail I recieved from Menard admitting he took $800 from Lance.
Menard also e-mailed the paper in a panic trying to cover his tracks saying I was a stalker and troll.
Although he couldnt deny the fact he took money from Lance. ;)
Menard has engineered his own demise, he has no one else to blame.
 
2/ John Doe has informed me that his name is not "Defendant".
Can you prove otherwise?

Look carefully! See how they trick us! It is written as JOHN DOE. Menard's action is against John of the family Doe's straw man. John: Doe can present his birth certificate to the court and declare himself as a third party representative of the legal fiction and withdraw his consent.

Now, what was that Menard always harped on about what to do when an order was made? Oh yes! You can present them with a bill.
 
If the all-powerful notaries are in on it then resistance is futile.

They are beekeepers! Bee-Keepers!

I swear, if it wasn't for you pesky kids Id have gotten away with this.


picture.php
 
Look carefully! See how they trick us! It is written as JOHN DOE. Menard's action is against John of the family Doe's straw man. John: Doe can present his birth certificate to the court and declare himself as a third party representative of the legal fiction and withdraw his consent.

Now, what was that Menard always harped on about what to do when an order was made? Oh yes! You can present them with a bill.

picture.php
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom