Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tried to post a pic but can't until I make more posts... but I have a picture of my coworkers car next to another Freeman's and the other guy did contracting work for a cop and had it parked in his driveway for four days, and all the cop said is that he did not want trouble. Plus like I said, I was with him when he went right through an OPP check stop last holiday weekend.



See, that picture proves nothing. It would be trivially easy to change out a few license plates for a picture or two. And of course, we've never denied that there are people with such plates. The really critical thing is the police response to the cars thus plated - and for that part of the claim, the part we've always objected to, you don't have any evidence. If you had it, you probably would have mentioned it, right?

See, it's these continual failures to provide the evidence that would actually support the claims we oppose that leads us to conclude that the FOTL promoters are conmen.
 
Do not make sockpuppet accusations in threads. If you believe a member is a sockpuppet, use the Report function. Also, while I'm here, do not personalize your arguments and remain civil and polite. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: jhunter1163
 
HI. I came here because of a comment made by Jargon Buster on a youtube video and I am hoping you guys can help me win an argument with a co-worker concerning the whole Freeman thing...
I pointed out Lance Thatcher, so he befriended Lance on FB and asked him directly if Menard scammed him, and Lance said no. So pointing to that is a no-go.

That's an incredibly believable story.

1/ Lance Thatcher has severe mental issues and Menard conned him.
Lance could never tell you or 'your friend' this because.... he has severe mental issues and was conned out of a lot of money for fake legal advice by a conman.

2/ The proof that Menard is a simplistic fool who likes to con people in order to fund his hearty-breakfast and weed habbits is there for all to see. He has wasted ten years of his life copying silly Amercain scams in order to fund his lazy lifestyle.

Edited by jhunter1163: 
Edited for breach of moderator directive.


4/ Robert Menard is a conman.

5/ Have a look at Robert Menard's latest scam. If your BS-O-Meter doesnt go mental after the first 3 seconds then you and 'your friend' Bobby can have fun together.
You could even invite conman Roger Hayes to give Menard's ego a massage.
Don't drop the soap Robert!

Edited by jhunter1163: 
Edited for breach of moderator directive.


8/ Robert Menard is a conman who ran away from this forum when, again, it was pointed out to him that he was full of porcupine faeces and that his then latest scam was dog poo that would never in a gazillionty years work.

For the sake of Menard and Hayes I won't use numbers greater than 8.

Edited by jhunter1163: 
Please refer to above mod-box.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Within twelve posts catweasel has changed from a disbeliever in fotl to a promoter of fotl.
Now, I wonder how that could have happened:D

I am hardly promoting it, and think that even if it is true, its dangerous because we do not know what will result from it. But I am a skeptic by nature and that skepticism is applied equally.
 
Gone so soon. Sigh.

Sorry but I can't spend the entire day online. I have two kids to look after and had to feed them, a house to clean before the wifey comes home, and an engine to rebuild. I will have to post intermittently. I hope that is ok?
 
He will be back with another drive by smattering of BS.

His ego is pricked.

So asking if there is proof of your beliefs is BS? Sheesh I came here for help, and hoped you guys would be able to help me. But now I see merely questioning firmly held beliefs results in an attack. Just like on some FMOTL forums.

When it comes to believing things with no proof, you guys are as bad as the FMOTL cult!
 
I have two kids to look after and had to feed them, a house to clean before the wifey comes home, and an engine to rebuild.
Sure you do. :rolleyes:

Would you care to comment on the court ruling documentation?
 
Last edited:
See, that picture proves nothing. It would be trivially easy to change out a few license plates for a picture or two. And of course, we've never denied that there are people with such plates. The really critical thing is the police response to the cars thus plated - and for that part of the claim, the part we've always objected to, you don't have any evidence. If you had it, you probably would have mentioned it, right?

See, it's these continual failures to provide the evidence that would actually support the claims we oppose that leads us to conclude that the FOTL promoters are conmen.

I agree and wish I had some proof, cause then maybe you wouldn't all be accusing me of being someone I am not...

But, your need for evidence is not applicable when it comes to calling Menard a conman, right? That you have all agreed on, with no evidence or proof, and now if anyone asks you for proof, you attack them just like the FMOTL attack those who ask for evidence. If you continually fail to provide evidence of your claims that Menard is a conman is it not fair to conclude that those who promote the belief that he is a conman are the conmen themselves? Good for the goose and all that.

That is what I don't understand. Shouldn't the level of proof you demand from the FMOTL cult to prove their beliefs be applied to your beliefs?

Does anyone else see the discrepancy and double standard? Or is it just me?
 
So asking if there is proof of your beliefs is BS? Sheesh I came here for help, and hoped you guys would be able to help me. But now I see merely questioning firmly held beliefs results in an attack. Just like on some FMOTL forums.

When it comes to believing things with no proof, you guys are as bad as the FMOTL cult!

Let me try to help you here.

FOTL is made-up BS.
There is nothing to it.
Menard copied the scam from the original American version from the '80s.

It is a 100% fart-mongering-hippo-turd-sandwich.

You can discuss it until the cows come home but the fact remains, and always will, that it is all.. every single word of it... complete and utter bollyhocks designed to fool gullible, desparate people into falling for, (and often paying for), a big steamy pile of lies.

Hint #2:
Robert Menard is a conman who has never done what he has preached.

Hint#3:
Robert Menard is a conman.
 
7521131764


My co-workers car.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/82100148@N03/7521131764/
 
Hi Horatius... thanks for the reply and not accusing me of being Menard. The problem that I have is that my co-worker is driving around with his homemade plates, no registration or insurance or license. I was with him the other night on the long weekend, we went through a check stop here in Ontario, and the cops saw his plate and just waved him through, and everyone else they stopped and made sure they weren't drinking. I have a picture of his car showing the plates, but did not have a camera during the stop. So I have to wonder if there is not some truth to it.

Well how wonderful. Then get your camera and write a letter to the local police telling them of your wonderful friend and saying you're going to come by at x time to their location and film their acceptance of his plates.......

We'll wait

Oh catweasel one other question, can one person govern another without that that person's consent?
 
Last edited:
Let me try to help you here.

FOTL is made-up BS.
There is nothing to it.
Menard copied the scam from the original American version from the '80s.

It is a 100% fart-mongering-hippo-turd-sandwich.

You can discuss it until the cows come home but the fact remains, and always will, that it is all.. every single word of it... complete and utter bollyhocks designed to fool gullible, desparate people into falling for, (and often paying for), a big steamy pile of lies.

Hint #2:
Robert Menard is a conman who has never done what he has preached.

Hint#3:
Robert Menard is a conman.

Do you have proof of any of this? Is that too much to ask? Or should I believe YOU and not him because you repeat yourself? I mean if he is a conman, one as bad as you say, surely there must be proof, and since you are so big on having proof before believing something, how am I the bad guy for wanting proof before I believe something which you hold as self evident? Why hasn't he been charged if he is such a conman?

I think if he had been you guys would show that right off the bat instead of attacking those who ask you for proof of your beliefs. Right?

No offense intended, but I think maybe the people here are not quite the skeptical critical thinkers they think they are. You attack just like others who have beliefs unsupported by evidence when those beliefs are questioned.
 
He sells stuff that doesn't work, he takes money for stuff that doesn't work, what would you call that catweasel?
 
...
Oh catweasel one other question, can one person govern another without that that person's consent?

To be fair, I didn't actually consent to you asking that question.


? As I'm not Canadian I assume your friend has illegal plates?
And?
Has he been to the local police station and showed them his car and fake plates?

Or would this be the usual..... /drumroll ... "Haven't been caught yet so it must be a win" ?

If I strapped three grenades to my head, stuck a dangeroulsy sharp object up my rectum and hid in a bush for three years would that be a win?

/Hi Rob
 
Last edited:
catweasel said:
I mean if he is a conman, one as bad as you say, surely there must be proof, and since you are so big on having proof before believing something, how am I the bad guy for wanting proof before I believe something which you hold as self evident?
Sigh. I guess I'll just keep posting this until our "new" friend stops pretending it doesn't exist.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom