Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Imagine if fotl methods were used to run a country. How much contracts would each individual have, i imagne a whole garage packed floor to ceiling with private contracts with all your neighbours

contract with neighbour 1 to only drive past his house before the hours of...
contract with neighbour 2 not to play music after xoclock.
etc etc
 
Guys, i think by constantly asking rob for evidence, which he does not have! We are just sending him running for cover, i propose we just ask his opinion on things and ask for updates on his projects without requiring evidence, that way we will be recieve more hilarious posts.
 
And of course the hypocriscy of somebody who is seeking benfits from a government that he claims has no authority over him is staggering.
 
dudalb said:
And of course the hypocriscy of somebody who is seeking benfits from a government that he claims has no authority over him is staggering.
Click to expand...

The British freemen and freewomen have the same attitude towards state benefits. They all consent to getting handouts from the government.
 
I cam across this site in the wee hours of the morning whilst searching for information on Freeman woo as a friend of mine is getting sucked into it, along with chemtrails & 9/11 truth.

Originally I thought it was a protest movement which, as a veteran of the Poll Tax protests, I initially had some sympathy for.

However, just scratching the surface showed me it's pseudo-legal bunkum with an "I say it's true, so it's true" mentality and not very clever word-play/semantics.

I'm on page 11 of this thread after reading through the other thread on this woo.

Give me a day to catch up on the rest of the thread & I'll ask for permission to come aboard.
 
Enjoy the read. It's a long one but full of hilarious Menardisms.

Bear in mind that there are a great many pages that were moved to AAH after Menard cried to the mods.

it's pseudo-legal bunkum with an "I say it's true, so it's true" mentality and not very clever word-play/semantics.
Click to expand...

Nail on the head. It's a scam from the '70s that Menard is regurgitating.
The only thing that spoils the hilarity of his claptrap is the real life damage he has done to people and that he charges them real life money for the privelidge.
 
Baldric said:
I cam across this site in the wee hours of the morning whilst searching for information on Freeman woo as a friend of mine is getting sucked into it, along with chemtrails & 9/11 truth.

Originally I thought it was a protest movement which, as a veteran of the Poll Tax protests, I initially had some sympathy for.

However, just scratching the surface showed me it's pseudo-legal bunkum with an "I say it's true, so it's true" mentality and not very clever word-play/semantics.

I'm on page 11 of this thread after reading through the other thread on this woo.

Give me a day to catch up on the rest of the thread & I'll ask for permission to come aboard.
Click to expand...

Honestly, you really only need to read a few pages of this thread to get the gist of what's going on here. Menard just repeats the same debunked arguments every time he's here.

My sympathies for your friend, by the way.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=4afBD_bpeiM#t=595s

this is where Bobby explains that the state accepts his FMOTL status and his proof of that.
He asked a clerk of court to write it on some court paper and because they sent it to him he believes they think he is actually a freeman on the land (bearing in mind the status doesn't actually exist) :D:D:D

It's no wonder he shy's away from posting the evidence :rolleyes:
 
Bishop said:
Honestly, you really only need to read a few pages of this thread to get the gist of what's going on here.
Click to expand...

I've read a bit on David Icke's forum, which mainly consists of woo, wibble & denial. There is some information I didn't have, such as Menard's "daughter" being "kidnapped" by the Government. Before today all I knew of Menard was that he posted videos on YouTube although, I was aware of St Claire & had read a bit about him.

I'm trying to determine how they rationalise their legal position. Which is difficult, as there isn't one.
 
jargon buster said:
Baldric
If you want to put Bobby boy on the spot just ask him what he would do if you didn't consent to the rules in his freeman valley.
If you are new to this pay a visit here and ask a few probing questions about Rob
Click to expand...

He wont answer direct questions. I know this because I've seen you discuss taunt him elsewhere.
 
There's one thing I still don't get - what "logic" do they use to invoke Admiralty Law? Is it just to do with flags and "the power of words" or is there some mumbo jumbo that I've missed?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom