Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hans said:
Kudos but we do need a better term than 'great', such as ?
Click to expand...

I've only ever seen one Conmenardi.

So until he has a competitor he remains...

"The Great Conmenardi. With built in lasers, pretend police, an uhealthy interest in weapons, a pretend village, a pretend police force and an imagination that would make Willy Wonka look like a pensioner on morphine."
 
The BOA,The Bank of Canada Act, The Bank Act, The Financial Administration Act.
Yes all sounds great doesnt it Rob, but what does the consumer purchase principle hinge on?
Morality and philosophy???
Why, because you seem to believe the limits set on the claim is what is a reasonable amount??????????

Sounds like fraud to me. My masonry work is not worth $10K an hour. To prove it you want me to commit fraud, and undermine my right to use it further in the future?

I think I see now why some of this stuff is so very difficult for so many of you to grasp. You cannot conceive of using it wisely or maturely, and imagine only abusing the process ($10k/hr?) thus YOU must be denied it. And since you are willing to abuse it, so must everyone else, and thus no one can be allowed to use it.

But there is remedy for you: Just don't use it yourself!
Click to expand...

The absurdity of this latest scam is nothing short of insulting, you claim a legitimate way of offseting costs and actually creating money is available within the law and you can just go to the bank with a signed bill and they will redeem it, but only if it's a "reasonable" amount.
Absolute garbage.
 
60s probably, but I bet she now goes by the name Debra.
Thats my point, elderly ladies dont go by the name Debbie, unless they look like this
stock-photo-havana-circa-december-an-eccentric-old-cuban-lady-smokes-cigar-and-points-finger-circa-30406540.jpg


on the other hand she may be perfect for Menards con.

PS no offence to Debbie Reynolds, shes the exception to the rule :D
 
Sorry to those of you that feel that 60 for a woman is old. I find it pretty offensive some of what you all are stating here regarding women in that age. I am 60. Do not feel or look old at all. If I went by the name Debbie for most of my life then I would still be going by Debbie at this age. Sorry to say but it seems that these days old is not until you are 80 and that is when you might want to change your name to Debra. I agree with most everything regarding Menard however to state that a woman at the age of 60 is old and basically worthless is showing total disregard for those of us that are 60. There is plenty of information on the internet that 60 is not old.
 
Sorry to say but it seems that these days old is not until you are 80 and that is when you might want to change your name to Debra.
Click to expand...
Sorry wisp, my neighbour is over 80 and she finds your comment here highly offensive and she objects to you telling her she is at an age when she should change here name.

see wisp, its all about opinions ;)
 
Wisp said:
There is plenty of information on the internet that 60 is not old.
Click to expand...

What an odd comment.

60 isn't "old". Noone said it was.

The point you seem to have missed is that "the kind old lady" that Menard is using in his latest lie, is about as likely to be called "Debbie" as she is "Mercedes", "Chantelle" or "Fifi-Trixabelle"

People were merely pointing out yet another blatantly obvious flaw in Menard's latest pile of hogwash.

FTR: I'll be there in eighteen years. Wish I was there now.
Ageism is not the subject of this thread.
 
PROVE TO ME! PROVE TO ME! SERVE ME! DO NOT ASK ME TO THINK FOR MYSELF! Sheesh
Click to expand...

Do you really think this is a plausable explination for never providing evidence to back up your absurd claims?

Mr I'll spend 170 pages writting walls of text about jibberish, but dont dare ask me to spend 5 minutes uploading any proof that anything i say works.

Its plainly obvious from how desperate you are for people to believe your hogwash, that if you had any proof you would post it.

The fact you are still charging vunerable people for your "materials" already lets us know you are full of it, Because apparelty you can claim millions according to you, simply by cashing in your birth bond, There is no c3po, there is no feeman valley.

You have recieved no money from the airline. By now you are aware, that its plainly obvious to see, all of your so called projects have failed.

You are without doubt the worst conman in history.
 
I suspect the increasing regularity of Menard’s schemes is an indicator that each successive scheme is less well received in the freeman subculture, and less profitable to Bobby Boy, thus necessitating another scheme. . .and another. . .and. . .

The Elizabeth Anne Elaine Society. . . Menard’s pretend legal advice. . .the World Freeman Society. . . Freeman Valley. . . . C3PO. . .the lost computer. . . now the consumer card thing.
 
With a bit of luck he might drop his stupid consent theory as well.
I think it's going to be a case of him just throwing a lot of stuff against the wall and see if anything sticks from now on.

He knows he's busted and will try and just flip flop from one thing to another now to make a quick buck, he wont stick with any single thing now as he has lost his guru status within the 'would be' freeman community, even someone thick enough to believe the freeman nonsense is a workable concept can see through Menard and realise he is not a good role model for it.
 
Robert, it's your consent that is irrelevant, consent of the people is what matters.
No one gives a flying thingy about you, wake up Robert, you dont matter.

Isn't it ironic that you show a clip of Obama and consent.
Just look at how many 'birther' loons don't consent to him being the President, and guess what, he still is.

How is that possible Robert?
 
Last edited:
Mojo said:
The consent of the people is not the same as the consent of every individual. As you have been told before, you are not special.
Click to expand...

He said consent of the governed. Not consent of 'the people'. But to avoid cognitive dissonance you will hear what you want. Tell me do you think those who do consent are special, so their wishes out weigh the wishes of those who do not consent, even though they are not the majority?

I am not your cattle, so refuse to be grouped by you like I am. I am an individual, and I do not consent, not even to being in your imaginary group. In my group, the majority (100%) do not consent to being governed by you.

So suck it up, sweet pea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom