Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

[Mojo]

Statutes are not law. They are statutes.

Does anybody want to draw a Venn diagram for him?

 

[jargon buster]

Rob wrote

Okay since you are obsessed with Lance I will do my best to answer your daft question.
But then you will answer my non-daft question right?

I do not deny selling him a package, as I do not remember as it was two years ago. I may have.

Let me refresh your memory, you wrote in an email to me (available to all on request)

I have never sold anyone a singular document. If I recall correctly, that coin was for two days of my life, and 16 hours dedicated to trying to help him understand my perspective. It was also a DONATION, made by him to me, without any obligation to do so

You also e-mailed me the following

It is that which you will answer for.
So will you identify and meet me in court, or do I have to sic the authorities on you, cause you are a coward?

In any event, you WILL be identified, and charged for your criminal actions and face civil action.
Thank you for admitting your true goal, as expressed above.

I will not be communicating with you further, but will forward all your emails to my legal representative.

FAIR WARNING:
All you send to me can and will be used in a court of law against you.

You crossed a line, and all I needed was evidence of MENS REA. You gave me that with your email.

I will settle this with you, in a court of law.

Without malice, ill will vexation or frivolity,
Rob Menard

Hows that working out Rob?

Rob wrote regarding his land

I own it. Paid money for it. Have fee simple title held via a trust. Was planning on claiming alloidial title, though am now trying to sell it cause this area is not for me. Way too cold in the winter and mosquitoey in the summer. And the reason I came out here was for a romantic reason, and she does not want to live here, so I have to find something warmer.

Are you selling it with the cabin furnished or unfurnished, and how are you advertising it, I would like to see the site, I may even buy it, how much do you want for it?

 

[jargon buster]

Rob wrote

I consent to some when it suits my purposes and does not offend my morals or conscience.
I reject others when they do not.

Pick and mix approach to the law, thats not even going to wash with the most idiotic of your "marks"

But you need to see the world in black and white, don't you?
Do you follow statutes even if they go directly against your morals?

Which statutes go against your morals Rob?
Watch the money trail guys

 

[Bishop]

Menard will no doubt claim that you are still going to be charged for the whole stalking and harassment, so to preempt his lying, I'd just like to remind him that no crime was actually committed. For stalking or harassment charges to apply, the attention has to be unwelcome. Menard continuously replied to JB's emails and made no effort to break off contact. It does not matter what JB's "motives" were, in spite of Menard thinking that somehow provides "mens rea."

 

[jargon buster]

That cant be true Bishop, Menards legal team are working on the case as we speak, surely they would have pointed this out to him.

I have promised to send him a fee schedule for my attendance in court, Im thinking £10 million pounds flat fee, and according to Robs rules fee schedules must be paid.

Its all nonsense as Menard cant even leave Canada to attend court, he has no passport and would have to accept responsible government to get one

 

[Paul]

Surly it must be true, honest Rob wouldn't have said it otherwise.

As for he passport, after the last minor glitch I'm sure he's coloured himself a really impressive ID this time, it can't possibly fail.

 

[jargon buster]

Idea!
Rob post your lawyers details here or PM them to me and I will contact him/her directly and I will confirm if you have enlisted his/her services.
I bet they have run up a big bill by now Rob, are you going to A4V it
You up for it Rob?

 

[uk_dave]

Carefully strip back rybats to opening complete, needle as required, and form new slapping complete with 3 no. Robeslee type c units tightly packed to soffit of adjacent material using feathers or pinnings. Repoint masonry faces as required using a St. Astier NHL 3.5 1:3 mix, tamping and filling hungry joints, taking care to ensure that any exposed cores are parged in a suitable mix. Slaister exposed faces. Prick-up wall faces as required and apply splatterdash coat in 1:3 St. Astier NHL2, scratch coat nom. 15mm thick, straightening coat nom 10mm, final coat nom. 3mm in a non hydraulic lime putty mix.

Not in everyday English and yet (a) still English, (b) perfectly intelligible to those who work in this sector of the construction industry. And yet, by your reasoning, it technical language should be avoided.

How peculiar.

There you go. Though I was under the impression we were no longer allowed to post recipes for fajitas on here.

 

[uk_dave]

And I should also add, for the benefit of Rob of the family menard, that for a small fee* I'm sure Architect would translate that into plain english just like a lawyer does with regard to the law.

*I'm not sure he's accepting Euros at the moment.

 

[D'rok]

It all seems to be a matter of playing on words and praying on people who are unable to understand it all.

You've got it completely right on the first try. Well done!

 

[Jaynbob42]

Thanks mate. I thought long and hard about it haha

Quick newbie question, i see it said a lot but what is a 'woo'? I know it may be obvious but you don't learn if you don't ask

 

[Lisa Simpson]

Short for woo woo. First definition and there's a bit of naughty language on that page.

 

[tsig]

I consent to some when it suits my purposes and does not offend my morals or conscience.
I reject others when they do not.

But you need to see the world in black and white, don't you?


Do you follow statutes even if they go directly against your morals?

(bear in mind I know you have no problem acting immorally and dishonorably, you have admitted that repeatedly.)

No. I have never claimed to be above the law.
That is your inability to understand, and your need to misrepresent my position, so you can try to force me to defend your straw man argument.

Do you claim the people in the government are above the law, or will you agree they are not?

???

 

[Jaynbob42]

All becomes clear, thank you Lisa

 

[TSR]

All becomes clear, thank you Lisa

.
ITYMTS "..., I blame Lisa."

Don't think about it, it's just one of those fundamental truths: Blame Lisa.

< aside to Lisa: Love ya! Love your hair! Hope you win! >
.

 

[D'rok]

Rob wrote regarding his land


Are you selling it with the cabin furnished or unfurnished, and how are you advertising it, I would like to see the site, I may even buy it, how much do you want for it?

So does this mean that Freedom Valley Part Deux has failed before it even started just like the first time?

This was the one in Ontario right? Just outside Ottawa? The first one was in the BC interior, if I remember correctly.

Two for two, freeman. Better luck next time.

 

[Robrob]

Why is it these nimrods always seem to get arrested driving unlicensed vehicles on OUR TAXPAYER PAID HIGHWAYS?!

 

[grndslm]

Funny thing is... in the US of A, everybody who BUYS GASOLINE is actually the ones paying for the roads.

Pretty freaking logical, ain't it??

Want to pay for the roads? Travel in a gasoline powered automobile.

Don't want to pay for the roads? Travel in a non-gasoline powered automobile, bicycle, skateboard, etc.

Very simple. Very, very simple.

 

[TSR]

.
Of course, then you are also not in most cases traveling on the interstates, which is where that money goes. In the US, there is separate funding for county and city maintained roads.

Don't want to pay for those roads, either? Then stay the h*ll home and don't use them. Why should you be able to if you don't help maintain them?
.

 

[Mojo]

Here is how they do it in Canada.

Someone accuses you of breaking some rule in a statute and reports this to police. Police lay a charge without your consent and you are given a court date. If you don't show up a warrant will go out for your arrest and when you next encounter the police they will take you away at gunpoint without your consent. They will hold you in jail against your will until you first court appearance where you will be asked to enter a plea. If you do not enter a plea then a plea of not guilty will be enter and a trial date scheduled. You will be forcibly held until your trial date and brought at gunpoint to your trial where the court will hear the evidence against you and if you are found guilty then you will be given a punishment. This punishment again will be forced upon you without your consent.

There are numerous examples of this happening to people who take substantially the same position you do. For example here is an example of someone who didn't consent to the original notice to appear, was arrested for failing to appear and brought to court at force without their consent. Then they refused to enter a plea and a plea of not guilty was entered for them without their consent. A trial was held without consent and despite making the same kind of objections that you do (that the court has no jurisdiction over people without consent). The person was found guilty and thrown in jail against their will and without consent. This was all done by force.

Whether this conflicts with you political ideals or your notion of equality is irrelevant. This is simply what happens when people take the position that you do. It is repeated and predictable and we know of no instance where these same sort of results did not occur. This is how the de facto government of Canada through their de facto court can and does govern people without their consent.

This is how they do it in Australia:

As she was being led to the cells Eilish De'Avalon told Judge Geoff Chettle: "I decline your offer, your Honour''.

"You decline my offer? Well I'm afraid it's not negotiable," Judge Chettle replied.