Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lisa Simpson said:
Does Scotland Yard do perp walks? I want to watch for you on BBC America news. :p
Click to expand...

Whilst there is possibly a 0.2% probability that Scotland Yard are aware of the conman Robert Menard, (they have proper criminals to catch.... and I think Menard has been watching too much X-Files), I am more than happy to join a photo opportunity outside of New Scotland Yard, (Yes, there's a New one now Rob), and wave aloft my banner proclaiming, without fear of being labelled slanderous, that "Robert Menard is a CONMAN"

JB can hold the other pole. Nice pic.
...I'll have a quick shave before the black helichopters descend tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
Everytime I hear about this lot, I just keep thinking of the "I am...the law!" scene from Judge Dredd.

 
Menards bowled another Googlie on Ickes
Now maybe you will claim that you do not consent, but as we are speaking of law, your consent is not required. It is the law that allows me to protect myself and my property from your trespass, not statute.
Click to expand...
http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060029158&postcount=23

http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/00_96462_01

The Trespass Act
Methods of giving or posting notice
5 (1) For the purposes of paragraph (c) of the definition of "enclosed land", signs must be posted so that, in daylight and under normal weather conditions, from the approach to each ordinary point of access to the enclosed land,

(a) a sign is clearly visible,
(b) if a sign contains writing, the writing is clearly legible, and
(c) if a sign uses graphic representation, the graphic representation is clearly visible.
(2) For the purposes of section 4 (1) (b) or (c), notice may be given
(a) orally or in writing, or
(b) by means of a sign posted at or near an ordinary point of access to the premises so that, in daylight and under normal weather conditions from the approach to the ordinary point of access, the sign satisfies the requirements of subsection (1) (a), (b) and (c) of this section.
(3) In a prosecution for an offence under section 4 (1) (a), (b) or (c), proof that a sign that complies with subsection (1) or (2) (b) of this section, as applicable, was posted at the ordinary point of access used by the defendant to enter the premises is sufficient for the purpose of establishing, as applicable, that
(a) the premises are enclosed land, or
(b) notice was given for the purpose of section 4 (1) (b) or (c).
(4) A sign, posted in accordance with subsection (2) (b), that names an activity and has an oblique line drawn through the name or that shows a graphic representation of an activity and has an oblique line drawn through the representation is sufficient for the purpose of giving notice that the activity is prohibited.
(5) A notice under this section may relate to all or a part of premises and different notices may be given or posted in relation to different parts of premises.
(6) A person, other than an occupier or authorized person, must not remove, alter or deface signs posted for the purpose of subsection (1) or (2) (b).
(7) A person who contravenes subsection (6) commits an offence.
Click to expand...

The only lawful way Menard can remove someone from his land is to comply with the trespass act as above, if he doesn't do that then they are not trespassing at all.
 
Last edited:
Yes, jason c stopped him in his tracks.
jason wrote
If Canada is a corporation that makes public land actually private and you being on them tresspass. Therefore the corporate Canada can treat you as you would the harmless tresspasser, no?
Click to expand...
Rob wrote
No. It is public land, not private. Being administered by a corporate entity does not make it theirs. They act in trust and it always belongs to us.
Click to expand...
jason wrote
Then what makes it your land?

And what about the harm issue?
Click to expand...

Perfect :)

Menard went >>>>>>>>>>>>>
 
I'd like to propose the addition of another category. "Disgusting pile of filth"

I'll bleep myself out here to save the JREF swearinator:

Rob ****** Menard is a disgusting pile of ****** filth who profits from other peoples' misfortune.

I waited for three hours for the black helichopters from Scotland Yard to come get me today.... turns out it was another ****** Menard lie. :rolleyes:

* Unless Conman:Menard can prove, in a Court of Law, that he is not a conman I have said nothing slanderous.
 
THe best one yet

Menard has exceeded all expectations
This is an e-mail he has just sent me
The intentions and goals you stated on the forum were a lie, and was merely you seeking to manipulate a community with your lies, and the truth is exposed with your email to me, where you stated:
My only goal was to destroy your reputation

It is that which you will answer for.
So will you identify and meet me in court, or do I have to sic the authorities on you, cause you are a coward?

In any event, you WILL be identified, and charged for your criminal actions and face civil action.
Thank you for admitting your true goal, as expressed above.

I will not be communicating with you further, but will forward all your emails to my legal representative.

FAIR WARNING:
All you send to me can and will be used in a court of law against you.

You crossed a line, and all I needed was evidence of MENS REA. You gave me that with your email.

I will settle this with you, in a court of law.

Without malice, ill will vexation or frivolity,
Rob Menard
Click to expand...

he now has a legal representative :D:D:D:D:D:D
How the worm has turned, when the muck hits the fan he turns to the kangaroo courts for satisfaction.

Rob, I conditionally accept your invitation and will reveal my name upon the payment of my fee schedule of $1 billion.

he he he

PS he has even mine quoted my quote
I actually wrote
"My only goal was to destroy your reputation within the freeman on the land loon community"
 
Last edited:
Without malice, ill will vexation or frivolity, I hereby state under a gold-fringed flag that Robert Menard is a conman.

The Canadian Tax Authorites are well aware of this.
The Courts know this.
The boys in orange jumpsuits can't wait to meet "Wolverine".

ETA: JB, My black helichopters didnt turn up this morning, did yours?
 
Last edited:
Jeez...cut Scotland Yard a little slack. They are a bit busy with the NotW phone hacking thing.

Help me here. He doesn't believe the courts have jurisdiction over him, but he's going to use the courts to charge you criminally and civilly?
 
Help me here. He doesn't believe the courts have jurisdiction over him, but he's going to use the courts to charge you criminally and civilly?
Click to expand...

yup , and hows he going to do that when i have learned everything from him about not consenting.

Surely he knows the court has no jurisdiction over a freeman on the land, or does it.
Menard its over to you.
 
If he really was going to forward all your emails to a real lawyer you could have a lot of fun...








...and enter some interesting information into an official record.
 
What no swooping Scotland yard got you guys? Does this mean Menard did a Menard, once again? LOL

"My only goal was to destroy your reputation within the freeman on the land loon community"
Click to expand...

Well he seems to have done an excellent job of that all by his lonesome - with a bit of help from JB and others.
 
Last edited:
It appears Rob has put a price on my head now, half the money he gets in damages after he has sued me.
Way to go Rob.
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=175768
I love these beauties
According to my legal department, his actions clearly constitute unlawful harassment and criminal defamation, and he gave me the evidence of MENS REA I needed. Yes, Scotland Yard, (Or The Met as they are actually known) has been informed, along with the RCMP, and letters are being sent to other interested parties. He will be identified, and charged.
Click to expand...

The guy now has his own legal department (FMOTLers please take note)

He has now Googled Scotland Yard and found out it is actually the Met Police, Im sure they will now initiate a dawn raid on my residence and extradite me to Canada to face trail for breaching statutory legislation, which according to Rob I have no way of refusing to consent to???
He has informed the RCMP who he has said in the past are just policy enforcers and has recruited his own 3CPO police force to arrest them????
Now he wants their help???
 
jargon buster said:
He has now Googled Scotland Yard and found out it is actually the Met Police, Im sure they will now initiate a dawn raid on my residence and extradite me to Canada to face trail for breaching statutory legislation, which according to Rob I have no way of refusing to consent to???
Click to expand...

I'm sure the Met have more important things on their plate than Menard's paranoia ... there's a small case of phone hacking and possible police corruption going on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom