Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Aitch · May 20, 2011

BobHaulk said:
How does one get recruited cause i'm always looking for a new angle and as a big fan of George Smiley i've always fancied a gig with the secret services

You know those advertising leaflets that get shoved into your mail-box? One of them will be a coded application form. If you can figure out which one and call the number on it, you are NWO material and will be contacted.

ComfySlippers · May 20, 2011

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?p=1059918055&posted=1#post1059918055

I sense the ban-hammer above my head.

Quote:
of course i realise if i actually break the law or breach the peace i will expect to be punished

Then FOTL-Woo is not for you

Following FOTL-Gibberish will cost you financially, and possibly land you in prison.

Read through this FOTL section and you will quickly see that it is all about people trying to shirk responsibilities. Sure, they mask it behind "not wanting to be a slave to the government" nonsense etc., but it's mostly deluded beliefs in how to compensate for their failures in life.

Some people play on the naivety of those who believe this crap by selling them Lectures and DVDs etc. making promises that they can eliminate all their debts, cash in their "Birth Bond", drive without plates, insurance, license or MOT. It's a very very old scam.

With regard to examples of what a pile of BS the whole thing is, there are hundreds of court cases to read that, (as if any proof was even needed), show how FOTL-Woo is made-up rubbish.

Only accept Legal advice from a real lawyer, not the muppets here who pretend to understand the "secrets" of Law. Certainly don't believe what "beardy man" Rob Menard says or part with money for any of his crap.

jargon buster · May 22, 2011

davey jones is no more

http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=9975&start=10

since none of the other mods are here right now let me say good bye to davey jones for running every thread you touch off topic among other thing.

see you next month james. i dont have time for your infantile disruptions. some of us work ya know.

and on my next rain day or when i get time i will be clearing up many posts. i have had enough of the garbage here. lets get back to finding remedy.

and remember, here i am the remedy for crappy posts, trolling, off topic posts, spam and several other forms of malarky i must deal with.

this may also be a warning to the couple of other posters on thin ice. fly straight or be banned.

your friendly neighborhood ninja,
bmxninja357
gods peace

Boot2TheHead · May 22, 2011

Such a shame. I had noticed other members had been more willing to speak up against their crazier elements since you've shown up. This sort of decision is going to instill a chilling effect and ambiance of paranoia that could be more effective at destroying that place than any "agent" could manage. Good job(?)

Paul · May 22, 2011

I hope they don't think those are wins.

Who am I kidding, of course they do. Who wouldn't see being slapped down by the world's most polite judge as a win.

ComfySlippers · May 22, 2011

Well of the 13 people currently viewing that forum, (which is 2 up on usual), 2 are logged in, 1 is hidden and the other 10 are laughing their nobs off that people believe such tripe.

ETA: There's a vid on Youtube... damn, I don't believe I just said that.... that shows some of the posts critical of our Favourite Clown Menard.
I shall not link to it, as I do not agree or approve of some the poster's own CTs about Menard, but one of my posts is featured. lol.

tsig · May 23, 2011

jargon buster said:
davey jones is no more
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=9975&start=10

It would appear that posting rational sensible posts is a ban-able offence on WFS.
I was abused and insulted from my very first post and not once did I break forum rules.

I did get a post from one of the members with some nice freeman cases
Link
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcpc/doc/2000/2000bcpc22/2000bcpc22.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2000/2000canlii22837/2000canlii22837.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2000/2000abqb815/2000abqb815.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2001/2001bcca510/2001bcca510.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2001/2001bcsc675/2001bcsc675.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/sk/skpc/doc/2002/2002skpc118/2002skpc118.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/sk/skqb/doc/2002/2002skqb371/2002skqb371.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/sk/skpc/doc/2002/2002skpc119/2002skpc119.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcpc/doc/2003/2003bcpc13/2003bcpc13.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2003/2003bcsc1203/2003bcsc1203.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/nb/nbca/doc/2003/2003nbca53/2003nbca53.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2004/2004bcca395/2004bcca395.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/oncj/doc/2004/2004oncj356/2004oncj356.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2004/2004bcsc1831/2004bcsc1831.html
http://www.canlii.org/fr/qc/qccq/doc/2004/2004canlii45928/2004canlii45928.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2005/2005bcsc1730/2005bcsc1730.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2005/2005bcsc839/2005bcsc839.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2005/2005bcsc1192/2005bcsc1192.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2005/2005bcsc484/2005bcsc484.html
http://www.canlii.org/fr/qc/qccs/doc/2005/2005canlii24313/2005canlii24313.html
http://www.canlii.org/fr/qc/qccs/doc/2005/2005canlii24311/2005canlii24311.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2006/2006bcsc1324/2006bcsc1324.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2006/2006bcsc750/2006bcsc750.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2006/2006bcsc188/2006bcsc188.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2006/2006bcca150/2006bcca150.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fct/doc/2006/2006fc455/2006fc455.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcpc/doc/2007/2007bcpc313/2007bcpc313.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2007/2007bcca214/2007bcca214.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/sk/skqb/doc/2007/2007skqb124/2007skqb124.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2008/2008bcsc590/2008bcsc590.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/ns/nssc/doc/2008/2008nssc112/2008nssc112.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcpc/doc/2008/2008bcpc400/2008bcpc400.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcpc/doc/2008/2008bcpc203/2008bcpc203.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2009/2009bcsc77/2009bcsc77.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2009/2009canlii9368/2009canlii9368.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2009/2009canlii9423/2009canlii9423.html
http://canlii.org/en/ab/abca/doc/2009/2009abca201/2009abca201.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcpc/doc/2009/2009bcpc278/2009bcpc278.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fct/doc/2009/2009fc99/2009fc99.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abca/doc/2010/2010abca312/2010abca312.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2010/2010bcsc565/2010bcsc565.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2010/2010abqb733/2010abqb733.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2010/2010bcsc831/2010bcsc831.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fct/doc/2010/2010fc858/2010fc858.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/sk/skqb/doc/2011/2011skqb38/2011skqb38.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/mb/mbqb/doc/2011/2011mbqb48/2011mbqb48.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2011/2011bcca99/2011bcca99.html

Looks like they killed the whole thread.

The requested topic does not exist.

jargon buster · May 23, 2011

yes they have removed a lot of my posts
The one about the number of members has gone, I went into the members list and there were over 3000 members who have not even posted and 1500 who have made only one post and most of them were spam.
Out of 6300 members there are around 15-20 members who post at all.

I exposed jackieg as a liar on more than one occasion and travette who posted about discharging a credit card debt had letters hidden in his website crying poverty to the bank and another from the debt agency saying that has claim had no validity.
I would put money on the fact that he simply has no money and the bank and debt collectors are simply waiting for a change of circumstances.

They are a bunch of halfwits, with Rob head of the leader board.
Rob claims that he is not a leader but the members list clearly has him listed as group leader.

I now believe Rob when he says he doesnt sell his ideas in a package, the truth is they are for sale but he has never actually sold one.
The whole site is a front for a few deluded simpletons who pretend they are taking over the world.

Mojo · May 23, 2011

jargon buster said:
I did get a post from one of the members with some nice freeman cases
Link
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcpc/doc/2000/2000bcpc22/2000bcpc22.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2000/2000canlii22837/2000canlii22837.html

From the second one:

Black’s Law Dictionary (7th Ed.) (1999) gives as the primary meaning of the word “person”, “a human being” and, as a secondary meaning, “an entity (such as a corporation) that is recognized by law as having the rights and duties of a human being”.

Oops.

jargon buster · May 23, 2011

While I was over on WFS I had this in my sig

A human being cannot claim to govern another without his consent without abandoning the rule of law which states we are all equal before the law. (Amended for jackieg)

The idiotic freemen over there were arguing against it.

It is Menards catchphrase virtually word for word.
I have had around 50 posts now removed from the site, including the arguments about my sig, I wonder who deleted them

It just proves the idiots don't even know their own argument, they just want to disagree so badly with a skeptic they just make stuff up as they go along.

ComfySlippers · May 24, 2011

They're a mad bunch of bananas.

...Not posting on Ickes because folk keep spoiling their deluded rants with that pesky thing called truth....

...Deleting multiple posts on WFS because people spoil their crusade with that pesky truth thing again... (Oo, I wonder if crusade is a maritime word- "Crews Aid")...

Idiots.

Horatius · May 24, 2011

ComfySlippers said:
...Deleting multiple posts on WFS because people spoil their crusade with that pesky truth thing again... (Oo, I wonder if crusade is a maritime word- "Crews Aid")...

Idiots.

Close. It's actually "Cruise-Aid", that is, booze.

Yes, they're all drunk. On Grog, we must assume.

ComfySlippers · May 24, 2011

Ahoy mi mateys.

Mojo · May 26, 2011

jargon buster said:
I did get a post from one of the members with some nice freeman cases
Link
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcpc/doc/2000/2000bcpc22/2000bcpc22.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2000/2000canlii22837/2000canlii22837.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2000/2000abqb815/2000abqb815.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2001/2001bcca510/2001bcca510.html
http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2001/2001bcsc675/2001bcsc675.html

...

And from the fifth one:

THE COURT: Who are you, sir?

MR. GALBRAITH: I am the sovereign natural person under common law, Kirk Marshall Galbraith.

THE COURT: Congratulations.

Tolls · May 26, 2011

hehehe that one is quite funny.

THE COURT: Thank you. Whatever your name is, if you're the person who is here in response to this Information, you may participate in the proceedings or not as you choose. If you are going to participate, you will come to the table here and do so. If not, we're just going to proceed as though you did not show up.

MR. GALBRAITH: But there are jurisdictions such as admiralty and law --

THE COURT: Okay, stop that nonsense. Stop that nonsense.
...
MR. HOFFMAN: Your Honour, are we proceeding under the assumption that the accused has absconded within Section 475 or are we proceeding with the assumption that Mr. Galbraith, who is standing in the courtroom --

THE COURT: I'm not going to find him to have absconded when he's standing here even though he is not making much sense.

Dave Rogers · May 26, 2011

I think I've said it before, but this reads like Myles na gCopaleen's Cruiskeen Court of Voluntary Justice.

MR. GALBRAITH: Well, there was no transcript so there's -- so there's no process hearings the way I see it. You know, there -- there is so -- it's the old thing again, there's one rule for those in power and who are paid by the powers, the money powers of the world. There's basically ten families that run the whole world, my goodness.

The learned trial judge rejected this line of defence.

Dave

Sceptic-PK · May 26, 2011

Wow, circa 2000? Had no idea the freeloader nutters had been around that long.

jargon buster · May 30, 2011

Menard is getting a pasting again over on Ickes.
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=171172
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=171131
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=171039&page=2

He's on his own this time as all his followers are too embarrassed to back him.

his records stuck again on the law vs policy argument.

I hope someone tells him that his withdrawal of consent is just his policy and as such the government can ignore his rules with impunity.

jargon buster · May 30, 2011

its like groundhog day on Ickes, here point Menard to this thread
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=160427

jargon buster · May 31, 2011

lets see how Menards peace officer recruitment is going shall we

http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=5463

Wow..they are climbing over each other to sign up.
thats over a year old

Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Unregistered

Banned

Banned

Thinker

Illuminator

Banned

a carbon based life-form

Banned

Mostly harmless

Banned

Banned

NWO Kitty Wrangler

Banned

Mostly harmless

Philosopher

Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through

Illuminator

Banned

Banned

Banned