Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been away for a month and a half....did Hobbiton get built yet?
 
If the Bond created at your birth is a monetary value of you as a person,
surely all these numpties would have Bonds totalling $3.50 ?
 
Okay, I need to do this.

Ignoring all the rest of the FOTL-Woo, and just concentrating on the Birth-Bond:

Despite this, the most dumbest of scams ever having been going on for over 40 years, being something that Menard is still "researching" he needs to address three issues.

1/ Countless people have gone to prison for attempting to use this nonsense, as have the con-artists who have peddled it. Why is this? They were "doing it wrong?"

2/ Why did the evil Government put the secret bank account number on the back of the bc? To hide it? Would they have been caught out if it was on the front? Why didn't they have a secret book in a secret drawer with the secret account number written next to the bc number? Is giving the person a certificate with it hidden on the back more secret?

3/ Of all the most stupid scams out there, could he not have chosen one that at least shows some ingenuity? Not that anyone with half a brain cell would need it but there is over thirty years of evidence that this is a dumbarsed scam!
 
Does Menard include THIS in his $250 study pack?

(Safe .pdf download)

ETA: I know it's old and been seen, but Google is liking this thread atm.
 
Last edited:
Stacey Grove said:
No, Menard has an even better excuse.

Post 65 onwards:

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=141146&page=7

More proof of how he twists and turns everything.
He is a complete idiot.
Click to expand...



So, if you can't ever say that "he has a name", or refer to a person by any term like "respondent", how could you ever write a contract that would be lawfully enforceable between two people?

"That contract says Bill Smith will pay for that item. I am not the name "Bill Smith", I am myself!" "I am not "the party of the first part!"" "I am not "the tenant!""

Will you have to attached a complete DNA profile to each contract, so it's enforceable against "The human being "AGAGCC......AGAAGAAAA""?
 
Horatius said:
Will you have to attached a complete DNA profile to each contract, so it's enforceable against "The human being "AGAGCC......AGAAGAAAA""?
Click to expand...

A thumbprint using the blood of a sacrificed virgin is usually enough to identify a party to a contract and to enforce it, it's textbook contract law.:D
 
Godlike Productions ... from Feb 2008.

Freeman-on-the-Land
User ID: 364317
Canada

..is Coco Menard. Words are his. (Bolds are mine)
---
...I do not think you would speak as you do to his face. I have seen him spar and work a punching bag. This is who you face. Now imagine thousands of us.

We are smarter, better prepared and unlike a child of the province such as yourself, many have secured the right to carry concealed weapons.

Have a great day.
Rob
Click to expand...

Can you show where the offence of assault is limited so it is not applicable to those who act like you, by that I mean a childish and ignorant coward?

Bet you can't. What you should know is I have spent considerable energy establishing a line of communications with peace officers, so I can educate them without conflict and direct them to protect me as peace officers.

You broke the law, I did not.

Your unlawful threats will be made known to some peace officers. Your breach of the criminal code will be pointed out. Demands under the criminal code will be made against them. Failure on their part will result in them facing charges. They will act on my claim, as they have no choice, unless they want to face charges themselves. Bear in mind, the one I intend to speak to knows me well, and although we may have different political views, when it comes to peace and law, we are on the same side, and I spent a lot of time helping him understand what I know of the law.

In Canada, we do not threaten physical violence due only to a difference in political views. They will frown on that in a very serious way.

You will be visited by members of my lawful forces. You may know them as RCMP. They will have a little chat with you and if they feel the need to do so to protect justice and preserve the peace, they will charge you under the criminal code.

Looking forward to seeing your cowardly face in court.
Rob
Click to expand...


...and back to children and incest again...


Criminal Code
PART V: SEXUAL OFFENCES, PUBLIC MORALS AND DISORDERLY CONDUCT
Sexual Offences

Incest

155. (1) Every one commits incest who, knowing that another person is by blood relationship his or her parent, child, brother, sister, grandparent or grandchild, as the case may be, has sexual intercourse with that person.

Now we test your logic and reason and apply it here and see if it makes any sense.

Incest

155. (1) Every CORPORATE ENTITY commits incest who, knowing that another CORPORATE ENTITY is by blood relationship his or her parent, child, brother, sister, grandparent or grandchild, as the case may be, has sexual intercourse with that person.

Corporate entities do not have blood, nor blood relations nor are they capable of sexual intercourse.

Additionally, your perspective not only obstructs and perverts the course of justice, it defeats it and thus is not lawful nor would it be accepted in any court.

Finally it refuses to accept certain basic concepts that deal with statutory interpretation.
.
Furthermore, I did check with a lawyer I know just to see if I was way off base. He stated that my interpretation was right on.

Can you explain how a CORPORATE ENTITY can commit incest, or do you acknowledge they are incapable of doing so and therefore your interpretation is unsound?

Peace eh?
Click to expand...

---

Then, as silently as he arrived, our Super Hero Freedom Fighter vanished.
Leaving a further three pages of :"I tried this, it works", "Thank you Rob, this has changed my life".... well, you know the story.
 
Last edited:
June 2009 : From his No-Fly days.

AVCANADA
Words: Coco Menard. (Bolds are mine)

--
Well you west jet employees sure are nice and understanding. Went to court today and got some documents, spoke with a lawyer and called the RCMP with whom I have an appointment and will be swearing out an information and taking it to court. I will be serving my fee schedule on both West Jet and The Minister of Transportation and that starts at $2500 per hour. As for the John Baird and your CEO, there is a thing called the Criminal Code of Canada and it is against the law to engage in extortion. They according to my lawyer friend, are liable for accessory to extortion after the fact.

Well it was nice to see what you folks are really like, shallow and clique and with about as much intelligence and warmth as one would expect from any other sophomoric servers in any cheap restaurant. And the idea that you would be willing to abandon the very rights others were willing to die for is a betrayal of their sacrifice.

In any event, I don't think I am going to feel too badly about bringing a whole lot of public attention to the act of extortion your organization has engaged in, and when I have a chance to speak in public I will be sure to mention the cold and heartless responses received from the folks here. Incidentally, I do stand up comedy, when my right to travel is not being infringed upon, and I think I can get a great ten minute bit about all this,and about how the servers at Hooters have more heart and intelligence. And they are much easier to look at too!

Bye now, I am going to see if I can have your Christmas bonus cut in half with my fee schedule. Incidentally, there will be more and more people coming to fly without government issued ID and they too will have fee schedules of $2500 an hour, or $60K a day. Now I know many of you children will scoff at the idea of a fee schedule, but I guarantee your lawyers are not, neither is your management and when just a few people do it, you will see a big difference in your pay checks and profit sharing dividends.

Have a great day, fly safely and try not to be as rude to your guests as you are here to visitors, and please don't be so arrogant, ok?
Click to expand...

I do not have government issued anything, and when I flew before my identification documents were accepted. It is an Affidavit signed by a Notary Public attesting to who I am. It has my picture, signature and certain personal information and is sufficient for the court to start process and as such your airline will have a very difficult time claiming more is needed to establish identity. Especially when the communications between your airline and Transport Canada specifically and clearly acknowledge they know who I am. The Passenger Protect Program is not about protecting passengers, but of achieving submission and doing so unlawfully.

I have used my documentation of identity before about five or six times and it is all I have. And yes, they are forced to 'check id' they are however not forced to deny a boarding pass to those without government issued id and I will prove it in court and anyone who thinks they are, is simply ignorant and untrained in how to interpret statutes and regulations. And when I do establish the truth judicially, your actions are going to look like egg on your face and establish that your company acted unlawfully.

I do however wish you all peace, and hope you all continue to fly safely bringing people to their loved ones. In the end that is what it is all about.

Rob
Click to expand...

And when given every opportunity to identify my self as the affected party subject to the order, neither the Law Society who sought the order, nor the people in the court who gave it, are willing to point to me and say that I am the one affected by the order. And wanna know why? He who gives an order is liable for a bill, and that includes the courts. Think I am joking? People who give orders to their fellow man are liable for a bill and when a man was in court and ordered to stand, he asked if that was an order. The bailiff agreed it was and the man then gave him an invoice for $1000. The Bailiff, full of arrogance laughed and showed it to the judge , who did not laugh and asked the Bailiff if he had ordered the man to stand. When the judge found out an order was given, accepted and performed, the bailiff became liable. The man walked out with a cheque from the Bailiff for $1000 and cashed it. This has been verified and recorded.

Something tells me you people are not going to like me much when I am done. Especially when my Fee Schedule kicks in and I start bleeding your company at a rate of $60K a day and a bunch of other people join in and do the same thing... We could easily cost you millions per day. Have any of you ever seen what a properly served fee schedule does to people who claim authority? I have used them to get people who were unjustly arrested and jailed freed in a matter of hours.

And yes you do have a legal department and they have dealt with 'idiots' before. They have never dealt with me, and I am very far from an idiot. As a matter of fact, having had my intelligence and emotional quotient fully tested in laboratory settings, I know I am to someone of average intelligence what they would be to an idiot. On top of that I give new meaning to the terms tenacious and crafty and that is why some call me a Wolverine. (Stems from my army days.) And let us bear in mind, fully half the people out there are by definition below average intelligence, and of the remainder, 80% are within 10 points of average. Not bragging, but mine puts me in the top half percentile.

HAVE A GREAT DAY!
Rob
PS- It is a good thing your planes fly, because your logic does not.
Click to expand...

HI! Well after reconsideration and speaking with some folks, I have decided upon another course of action.

My goal is to make friends and alleviate your burdens and not load more on. If I seemed bent on revenge, that was not my intent.

So the way I see it WJ has three main concerns.
The first of course is safety.
The second is liability with TC.
The third is ensuring they know who their guests are.

Instead of suing WJ or even serving them a fee schedule, I will instead give them an Indemnity Bond worth $25K and if TC wants to charge them, WJ can send them to me with the Bond I gave them, and all liability will be mine. I will indemnify, not crucify.
Secondly I will post a Peace Bond valued at $5K and again gift WJ with that and if I ever act in a manner contrary to peace, I am out that $5K.
THEIR FINAL CONCERN IS ENSURING THEY KNOW WHO THEIR GUESTS ARE, AND IF THEY ARE HOLDING TWO BONDS ISSUED BY ME, THAT point becomes quite moot, right? (Sorry for the caps, I have a new Mac Book that does it willy nilly it seems) You can't say you do not know a party if you have accepted bonds from them.
Click to expand...

---

etc.
 
Last edited:
Menard rant:

Have any of you ever seen what a properly served fee schedule does to people who claim authority?
Click to expand...
Yup, sweet Fanny Adams.
I have used them to get people who were unjustly arrested and jailed freed in a matter of hours.
Click to expand...
Of course you have, rob, of course you have. And then in the morning you woke up.
 
I know this has already been said but I thought I'd repeat it

CLOWN and CON MAN
 
Rob wrote
They have never dealt with me, and I am very far from an idiot.
Click to expand...

I know its a tall order but Im sure Rob will one day work his way up the ranks to the lofty level of idiot.
 
Meanwhile back on Ickes solzhenitsyn offered to take up Rob on his six question challenge,
Robs response
Click to expand...
Nope. Am working on a reply for you, but it is Monday and I have much to do. Please be a little patient I will try to post it later.
Click to expand...

its now Friday and still no questions, maybe someone should give him a little prod...oops there you are Rob.....hello old friend*, could you sort out your mess please.

* he reads this forum avidly :D
 
jargon buster said:
its now Friday and still no questions, maybe someone should give him a little prod...oops there you are Rob.....hello old friend*, could you sort out your mess please.

* he reads this forum avidly :D
Click to expand...

In fairness, he did ask me his questions here:

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1059892742&postcount=103

Here is my (admittedly ineloquent) reply:

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1059893365&postcount=115

Reviews of my argument were not particularly positive ("long winded bore" I believe was one description!). Rob did suggest that he would respond:


rob menard said:
Hey Sol will respond later I have a busy day.
Click to expand...

Alas, he has not done so. Perhaps that's the end of it then. He seems to be cooking up some new argument based on the (now largely obsolete) Bill of Rights which I'm sure will prove to be similarly absurd.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom