Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wisp said:
Rob wrote this on Icke's consent thread.



All I can say is yuck. He would be the last person I would want to be with. Honestly he has to be really full of himself to think that all women want to be with him. I would not even turn my head to look at him an extra time nor would I want to be in the same room with him without a lot of other people around. His looks and his mannerisms are enough to turn off females like myself that actually have taste in men. I just can't see my husband ever wanting to be him either. Sorry but that statement of his is so false and yet I am sure that he is just way to narcissistic to even realize it. Thank god I like men with looks and brains.

Also just knowing what he did to that young girl would have had me turn my back on him very quickly.
Click to expand...

Originally Posted by rob menard
All the men want to be like with me.
All the women want to be with like me....

FTFT*

*fixed that for truth
 
Here we go again :rolleyes:
Great news!
The Low Impact Artist Eco-Village is once again a potential go.
I am seeking input in order to develop a leasehold type agreement for what I am calling Land Stewards.

I know two parties, one with 110 acres and one with 250 acres. I have agreement in principle with the first and have spoken briefly with the other. He is amendable to doing something similar with his land.
Click to expand...
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=155765

It will drag on with nothing happening for a month then the land owner will find out Rob is a sexual deviant then the locals will run him out of town.:D
 
Taken from WFS
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=8717
BMF Wrote
Are the rules of this website law or policy?
If they are law then everyone is bound, even people who are not members this site, if its simply policy then its just the people on the site who consent to the rules when they sign up.
Now, if you could withdraw consent then couldn't you withdraw your consent to the policy on the forum and break the rules as the policy does not exist for you?
Unfortunately in reality if you break the rules (policy) then you will be banned regardless of your standpoint.

Doesn't this sort of put a hole in the withdrawal of consent theory.
Thoughts please
Click to expand...

reverandjim wrote
no, when you withdraw your consent, you are also refusing benefit. in other words you wont be on the forum anymore. your choice. noone is forcing you to come here. no one is forcing you to leave. sound fair?
Click to expand...

BMF wrote
sounds fair to me jim.
So when you withdraw your consent to societies benefits how do you justify accepting societies benefits?
The benefits society provides are all around you, you cannot escape them.

Also ,when you withdraw consent, that becomes your policy (rule) correct?
So now as you are living among others who follow the statutes what binds them to your policy? (rules)

Do they have to accept your withdrawl of consent or can they refuse?
If they refuse then they are not bound by your policy, so why would your withdrawl of consent mean anything?
Click to expand...

Rob Menard wrote
I know this poster.

He is a purposely and intentionally disruptive man who will refuse to distinguish between policy and law. He is not here to discuss or learn, but to harass and stalk. His question has been answered repeatedly, but because he will not make a distinction between law and policy, he just keeps going around and around and around. He has made a complete fool of himself on the Icke Forum and was banned there. He is now banned here cause I have seen him do the same thing there, and start in the exact same way. I know who he is and what his intent his.

He will not define a benefit, and will try to claim that having access to a right is a benefit, and thus may be removed. He thinks of a service, such as getting the roads plowed as a benefit apparently. He will not distinguish between a policy which is applicable due to consent, and the law which is applicable regardless.

This forum is not a place for those who wish to intentionally disrupt discussion of remedy and freedom in order to replace it with argument about whether consent exist or whether existence automatically grants consent or whether there is a difference between ones policy and the law in general.

If necessary we will start a 'Special Needs' thread for those who cannot comprehend the most basic of concepts and seem to wish to only throw tomatoes at our blackboards.
Click to expand...

and promptly banned me :D:D:D:D:D:D
I certainly have his number now, (Big thanks to Jake Dale)
He will not distinguish between a policy which is applicable due to consent, and the law which is applicable regardless.
Click to expand...

WHAT AN IDIOT
Hes the one that cant accept that his policy is not the law and can be ignored with impunity.

He will probably delete the thread because leaving it there will ruin his theory and highlight the flaw in his argument.
 
Last edited:
Rob has added
Yeap as I thought, it was my stalker.
Does not look like you managed to ignore our policy with impunity though does it, JB? Just like a freeman cannot ignore a statute with impunity, he just keeps shooting himself in the foot, he cant help it
He came here with an intent to disrupt and ignore policy because it is not law. But it is policy and those who break it are banned. Those who have done so before, and are known trolls, are also banned. I trust the board appreciates my actions, even though here in this thread he was not allowed to disrupt.

Known cheats are not allowed in casinos. That is the house rules.
Known Trolls are not allowed in this forum. That is house rules, and we see they were easily applied to him, though he is now off crying he did not consent.

Bye Bye JB. You are without a doubt the biggest loser troll I have ever known. You are a sad sad man.
Click to expand...
I love this bit
Known cheats are not allowed in casinos. That is the house rules.
Known Trolls are not allowed in this forum. That is house rules, and we see they were easily applied to him, though he is now off crying he did not consent.
Click to expand...
Bolded is exactly what happens when a freeman thinks he has withdrawn consent and appears in court.

by the way Rob, if I am such a "sad man", why are you terrified of me? ;)
 
Last edited:
hey rob since you're watching why don't you come here and debate

can you do it without nanny moderators?
 
jargon buster said:
He will probably delete the thread because leaving it there will ruin his theory and highlight the flaw in his argument.
Click to expand...

He's going for avoidance instead. He's had the **** kicked out of him on his "More Good News" thread, so now he's trying to divert attention with his return to freeman valley -

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=155765

Would love to know where these plots of land are. What's the betting that the landowners know nothing about Rob's latest cunning plan to rip people off?
 
Jake Dale said:
hey rob since you're watching why don't you come here and debate

can you do it without nanny moderators?
Click to expand...

He doesn't have the cajones, but he reads this so lets wait and see how long it is before he posts something up on Ickes.

Eh, Rob? Sad little man.
 
He wont come away from the Icke forum and debate, he tried it once here and it lasted seven posts. :rolleyes:

he likes to stay where he is protected, it would appear sex offenders are protected over there.
 
Rob wrote on WFS
He came here with an intent to disrupt and ignore policy because it is not law.
Click to expand...

So I was banned for "intent" :D
So it would appear the cause no harm or loss rule doesn't apply on the WFS site!!!!!!!
I didn't even break the forum rules and I was banned, I suppose in freeman land when prisoners are released from jail they are thrown back in immediately, just in case they "intend" to break the law again.
 
Rob comes here and reads my last post and then writes
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=8717
Just for clarity's sake. He was not banned for his 'intent' and any one who says so is an obvious liar.

He was banned for his actions.

Actions which were contrary to our POLICY. A POLICY he had agreed to. He broke that policy, and demonstrated extreme dishonour.

He returned under another name and was easily recognized.

The previous ban was then enforced.

Bye Bye JB.
Click to expand...

So in freeman land time spent does not count, once a policy breaker thou shalt be cast out forever and never be forgiven.:)
He is making a total mockery of his stupid theories all on his own.
 
jargon buster said:
Rob comes here and reads my last post and then writes
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=8717


So in freeman land time spent does not count, once a policy breaker thou shalt be cast out forever and never be forgiven.:)
He is making a total mockery of his stupid theories all on his own.
Click to expand...

The man is shot to pieces. He's been exposed for what he is, his World Freeman Society is nothing but a loose collective of freeloaders, his Freeman Valley never got beyond Rob's Hobbit Hole (but he's trying that one again) and the numbers of blind loyal supporters on Ickes have dwindled. His "tour" of Canada even requires dribblers to pay for his travel and accommodation and you can pretty much count the number of attendees on the fingers of one hand.
 
Funny that Menard writes that this new town of theirs will be something new and unique. I can say for certain that this is not true. In Denmark in the 60's there in Copenhagen there was a new "town" started up. In this town people could own apartments, have their own stores, farm their own food etc. There were gates put up and it was fenced in. Within this town area there was a lot of pot dealing going on plus of course sales of bread, other baked goods, vegetables and other home made items. It was called Christiania. It was closed down a few years ago. I have only ever been there once myself to see this town.

So not very "new and unique" as Menard wants his followers to believe.

I am sure that Menard would likely want to also be able to sell pot there however the laws here in Ontario I am sure would put a stop to this nonsense pretty quickly. Wish that we could give the police a heads up on this though.

I find what he is doing though rather creapy. Can anyone also say Jonestown, combined with Lord of the flies and Christiania.

North of Ottawa to me is rather mocking the government. Lets hope he is stopped.
 
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=155765
0ver 60 viewings and not one comment so far :)
Oh yes ,they are all behind Menard, I bet its killing him that no one has commented.

Families are preferred over singles
Click to expand...
families with teenage girls no doubt.

I figure if I am happy with it, others should be,
Click to expand...
does his ego know no bounds?

Thank you very much for your input!
Click to expand...
he will be lucky.

cue his other log on "Irollaround" to make an appearance on the thread.
 
Wisp said:
Wish that we could give the police a heads up on this though.
Click to expand...

running off to the pigs and grassing on him for what exactly? and who is this we? would that be the jref? with it's forum that lets jargon buster post his stalking of menard or just a couple of company men who'd grass to the pigs there own grandmother to show what good little citizens they are.
 
spot on, thats him alright, same style and grammar. and who signs up to a forum and waits 15 months to make a post?????

running off to the pigs and grassing on him for what exactly? and who is this we? would that be the jref? with it's forum that lets jargon buster post his stalking of menard or just a couple of company men who'd grass to the pigs there own grandmother to show what good little citizens they are.
Click to expand...
bob, is that you??
 
Last edited:
jargon buster said:
spot on, thats him alright, same style and grammar. and who signs up to a forum and waits 15 months to make a post?????


bob, is that you??
Click to expand...
look at you, your whole life just spent waiting for someone to join you in your stalking of menard. Are you confined to bed? did a freeman run you over? I don't give a monkeys for menard but all this lets grass to the pigs rubbish makes me sick.
 
These people should very hardy with a pioneer attitude and a willingness to work together and have some talent or craft to offer at market.
Click to expand...

I think I've spotted his problem.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom