Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Standard woo-jackass response when faced with reality. It's a trait that all tin-foil-hatters share across the board. The complete and utter lack of any evidence that the conspiracy is true is confirmation that the conspiracy is 100% true! It wouldn't be a conspiracy otherwise!
 
Agreed again.

Would only add that I know someone on the DI Forum who made that point and got a warning over it! Says something about the mindset.
 
I got banned for becoming a freeman :D

All I did was claim the same things as Menard and was asked time and time again for proof of my exploits, although strangely enough, they never asked Menard :confused:
 
Oh dear, Rumpole just brought up the rule against pereptuities. I'd love to see the FOTLers try to tackle that one.
 
It's easy.

Yozhik will say the rule doesn't exist and the fact that Rumpole believes it does means that he is caught in the conspiracy.

Rumpole might be reminded to "do your research" as well.
 
Of course. I forgot how easy it is to be an ignoramus.
 
D'rok said:
Oh dear, Rumpole just brought up the rule against pereptuities. I'd love to see the FOTLers try to tackle that one.
Click to expand...

The law regarding perpetuities & accumulations is fiendishly complex & really only relevant for estate planning practitioners. The freemen have no chance of getting to grips with this technical material.
 
gtm said:
The law regarding perpetuities & accumulations is fiendishly complex & really only relevant for estate planning practitioners. The freemen have no chance of getting to grips with this technical material.
Click to expand...
I can't get to grips with it either, and I got actual instruction in it. I thank my lucky stars that it was one of the optional questions on my 1L property law exam.
 
Bump for part trois of The Spy Who Freed Me.

We're waiting...

 
D'rok said:
I can't get to grips with it either, and I got actual instruction in it.
Click to expand...

Well, that's because your instructors were part of the conspiracy and withheld from you actual knowledge of how it works.

Remember, it all boils down to the fact that Freemen have superior knowledge and so whatever they claim to know is, iPod factod, superior.
 
drkitten said:
Well, that's because your instructors were part of the conspiracy and withheld from you actual knowledge of how it works.
Click to expand...
But that means that they must have thought I can't handle the truth and they didn't see fit to groom me to join the super-duper NWO elite. :(

Remember, it all boils down to the fact that Freemen have superior knowledge and so whatever they claim to know is, iPod factod, superior.
Click to expand...
Damn them and their legal pig-latin!
 
drkitten said:
Well, that's because your instructors were part of the conspiracy and withheld from you actual knowledge of how it works.

Remember, it all boils down to the fact that Freemen have superior knowledge and so whatever they claim to know is, iPod factod, superior.
Click to expand...

More like, qui ego sic dico. With a healthy dose of quidquid latine dictum altum videtur.
 
Rob wrote on Ickes
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=149904
Look at all the time and energy he has put into this concept he does not believe in. A couple of years now, and his motivation? HE ASKED ME A QUESTION AND DID NOT GET ANSWERED FAST ENOUGH!
Click to expand...

Fast enough???
Its two years and you still havent answered it.
HERE IT IS AGAIN
Have you personally ever used the freeman "no consent" argument successfully in a court of law that you actively encourage others to use?
 
I cant help chuckling everytime I see Menard arm waving about one of my posts on another forum :D

To him its his lifes work unfolding in front of his very eyes and to me its a bit of light hearted relief on an internet forum.

As Rob would say
hehehehe

Peace heh.
Oh and good will to all men (maybe not "all")

PS Dont worry Rob, Im sure our paths will cross again soon (I have a whole new series of log ons on Ickes and WFS to go at in the new year)
 
Last edited:
jargon buster said:
Rob wrote on Ickes
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=149904


Fast enough???
Its two years and you still havent answered it.
HERE IT IS AGAIN
Have you personally ever used the freeman "no consent" argument successfully in a court of law that you actively encourage others to use?
Click to expand...

I feel sorry for rob, i really do. All he want's to do is spout rubbish to his followers without dissent and he can't. He is no different than a preacher telling lies to the flock on a sunday, only his lies cost money. The preacher will spout his mumbojumbo for free but rob charges for his and just like a preacher can't prove his god is for real arthur cant prove his stuff is real and just like believers in god the freemen believe it anyway. It's kinda sad really, the idea that with your one shot on this earth you spend it with a delusion flowing through your brain seems cruel to me, saying that, i don't give a moneys what rob gets up to or who buys his stuff or that yozik is wasting his time. I just like the fact they get annoyed though you have to watch because it becomes like a prison cause the guards are doing time just like the inmates
 
He now says Im a psycopath :)

Hes right I am, I have one in my avatar, maybe he should worry about the fact that I couldnt care less if he ends up walking the streets with a bottle of meths or even alone in his bedsit with the gas on slumped over his laptop.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom