Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
I particularly like the way he tries to legitimise it by saying it's an article from the Associated Press. Actually it's a copblock.org post from Larken Rose.

#2 Robert Menard 2012-09-27 17:09
To be clear, this is an article from Associated Press. Just for the idiots form the RANDI forum who think this is our position....


He still cares, isn't that cute?
 
That said, it would be kismet if he were pulled over for something by a copper familiar with that passage.
Menard hasnt the bottle to actually do anything himself, this is why he constantly encourages others, this type of information is just enough to tip a halfwit over the edge.
Menard simply believes that he can say, "wasn't me, I didn't do anything".
In case Menard forgot, this is exactly what Charles Manson said.

PS I have e-mailed the RCMP the link to the document, some links to Robert recruiting his "Peace Officers" and links to Robert where he wrote that it is lawful to kill police officers if you believe they are acting unlawfully.
 
On another note, its strange that Robert has removed his post from WFS where he talked about his "free meal", maybe it didnt pan out as he hoped.
 
the very real possibility that maybe in that case, the “law enforcer” was the bad guy and the “cop killer” was the good guy. As it happens, that has been the case more often than not throughout human history.
This is proof why they are not just lunatics but very dangerous lunatics.
 
On another note, its strange that Robert has removed his post from WFS where he talked about his "free meal", maybe it didnt pan out as he hoped.

One suspects it’s the day after Menard’s consumer credit tall tale went up in smoke, like all his other stories.

One imagines Menard is compelled, in a fit of displaced rage, to yap about how it’s alright to shoot police men and women in the same way he acted out at school after his ole daddy caught him in cowardly lies.
 
Last edited:
picture.php
 
#2 Robert Menard 2012-09-27 17:09
To be clear, this is an article from Associated Press. Just for the idiots form the RANDI forum who think this is our position....


He still cares, isn't that cute?



And I love the little distancing dance he pulls with "who think this is our position". No, it's not their position, he's just re-posting it....without comment.

Of course it's ridiculous to even suggest that this might indicate he agrees with it. :rolleyes:
 
Apparently the cunning nightweasels have now IP blocked me from WFS forums...
after all, you can't have people reading stuff and not agreeing with it, what sort of clown would think that was OK?


oh dear,
what a pity,
never mind




although, if I go to the WFS main page I am welcomed as a brother and invited to "Claim [My] Rights As A Freeman on the Land" so that's all right then; nothing to see here, do not look behind the curtain, soylent green is made of rainbows...
 
Last edited:
I particularly like the way he tries to legitimise it by saying it's an article from the Associated Press. Actually it's a copblock.org post from Larken Rose.

This wouldn’t be the first time Menard has plagiarized Larken Rose.
 
Apparently the cunning nightweasels have now IP blocked me from WFS forums...
Clear your "cookies" and you should be able to view again, just dont log in.
I can still view it OK and Im pretty sure I would have been blocked.:)
I still have two accounts there to enable me to search members posts, I just dont post so as not to give myself away.

Hello Rob, can you guess who I am?
 
Last edited:



Being discussed (sort of!) in this thread:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=244827

From pg. 28-30 of the decision:

c. Robert Arthur Menard
[121] Robert Arthur Menard [“Menard”] (typically styled “Robert-Arthur: Menard”) is the
subject of less case commentary. He is associated with the Freeman-on-the-Land OPCA
movement, and identifies himself as such: United States of America v. Emery, 2005 BCSC 1192
at para. 7, 70 W.C.B. (2d) 37. Menard has attempted to participate in legal actions as an
intervener, but was denied that status: United States of America v. Emery. That was an
extradition proceeding. Menard’s OPCA concepts outlined in that case include:

1. state actors require the consent of persons, any state activity without consent is oppressive;

2. a statute is not law and cannot be the basis for extradition; unlawful conduct is
only something such as rape or murder; and

3. Canada had “abdicated” its role in the extradition process and that Menard would
represent the interests of Canadians.

[122] Menard’s submissions concerning the United States were dramatic:

The American Prison System and SLAVERY:

Robert-Arthur: Menard will argue that the American prison system has in fact
turned into a system amounting to slavery, where prisoners are economically
forced to provide labour for corporate entities. Stock in private prisons can even
be purchased on the open market and the Prison Industrial System now operating
is one very hungry Beast with a growing appetite. It a clear they will always need
MORE employees/prisoners/slaves. Furthermore, these corporate enterprises are
primarily concerned with profit and not-rehabilitation or re-integration and using
punishment as a means of corporate enrichment is cruel and unusual. Speaking of
societies, none of the accused are members of the society governed by and under
the jurisdiction of the Grand Jury which handed down the Indictment.

[123] In 2008 the British Columbia Supreme Court in The Law Society of British Columbia v.
Robert Arthur Menard (8 January 2008) Vancouver S073719 (B.C.S.C.) granted an order
prohibiting Menard from acting as a lawyer and providing legal advice, and receiving
compensation for the same.

[124] This Court’s review of the Freeman-on-the-Land phenomenon has observed that Menard
is associated with or operates a number of “Freeman” Internet websites that market OPCA
materials, including the “Canadian Common Corps Of Peace Officers” (“C3PO”) (website:
http://www.c3po.ca), a group of self-declared and appointed vigilante “peace officers” who:
... are the answer to avoiding a police state in Canada. All able bodied and
suitable candidates can if they wish be hired to preserve and maintain the public
peace under affirmation and contract. In this way the people of Canada can deal
with errant or rogue police from the position of a peace officer, and those who are
Freemen can exercise their rights without hindrance by existing policy
enforcement officers and with the full protection of true peace officers.

These websites also indicate Menard travels and gives seminars, for pay.
 
Update to Rob`s night out from his Face Book page:


Steven Sharp UPDATE - Rob posted the following on the World Freeman Society public forum yesterday:

"Well the bill was signed, a note created, and it was included in the daily deposit today! Am meeting with the owners and their accountant on Friday to review their agreement with their bank and see if there is anything that might trip us up.... wish us well!"

about an hour ago · Edited
 
[124] This Court’s review of the Freeman-on-the-Land phenomenon has observed that Menard
is associated with or operates a number of “Freeman” Internet websites that market OPCA
materials, including the “Canadian Common Corps Of Peace Officers” (“C3PO”) (website:
http://www.c3po.ca), a group of self-declared and appointed vigilante “peace officers” who:
... are the answer to avoiding a police state in Canada. All able bodied and
suitable candidates can if they wish be hired to preserve and maintain the public
peace under affirmation and contract. In this way the people of Canada can deal
with errant or rogue police from the position of a peace officer, and those who are
Freemen can exercise their rights without hindrance by existing policy
enforcement officers and with the full protection of true peace officers.

Well, well Robert, fame at last.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom