• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

RMackey Declines Debate. Anyone Else?

Anybody here have the courage to debate me on live television? Stick your name in place of Mackey's.

Draft 1.0

Debate will take place for one hour taped at a public access t.v. studio in the Los Angeles area. Set will be a desk seating 3 (RMackey, Moderator, TruthSeeker1234), with television monitor behind it facing the cameras. An additional monitor will be present off camera presenting the participants the live feed.

RMackey and TruthSeeker1234 will each bring laptop computers, both of which will be hooked up to an input switcher under the control of the moderator. The output of the input switcher is routed to the on-camera monitor.

RMackey and TruthSeeker1234 each write 5 questions for the other. These are submitted to the moderator at the beginning of the show, and are kept secret until being read during the Q & A section later.

RMackey will begin by stating "The 3 buildings at the World Trade center were brought down by a combination of impact damage and fires" (or words to that effect). RMackey will then proceed to present his case for 10 minutes, utilizing his laptop and the monitor as desired, interacting (or not) with the moderator, as desired. TruthSeeker1234 will remain quiet during this time.

TruthSeeker1234 will begin by stating "The 3 buildings at the World Trade Center were brought down by pre-planted incindiaries and explosives" (or words to that effect). TruthSeeker1234 will then proceed to present his case for 10 minutes, utilizing his laptop and the monitor as desired, interacting (or not) with the moderator, as desired. RMackie will remain quiet during this time.

RMackey rebuttal for 5 minutes.
TruthSeeker1234 rebuttal for 5 minutes.

The Moderator begins reading the pre-submitted questions. First asks TruthSeeker a question written by Mackie, then the reverse.

Continue alternating Q & A until all 10 questions are done. Should take about 12 minutes.

Live call in question. Both participants comment.

Final clock is checked, remaining air time (about 6 minutes), is divied up equally for RMackey closing statement, then TruthSeeker1234 closing statement.
I'd like you to consider my counter-proposal.
You're not chicken, are you?
 
Ok I will put my name in.

Draft 1.1

Debate will take place for one hour taped at a public access t.v. studio in the Los Angeles area. Set will be a desk seating 3 (Lothian, Moderator, TruthSeeker1234), with television monitor behind it facing the cameras. An additional monitor will be present off camera presenting the participants the live feed.

TruthSeeker1234 will bring a laptop. Lothian will bring a water pistol and some bags of flour. TruthSeeker 1234 will be hooked up to an electrical shock switcher under the control of Lothian. Lothian will only use the switch when necessary or he feels like it.

Lothian and TruthSeeker1234 each write 5 questions for the other. These are submitted to the moderator at the beginning of the show, and are kept secret until being read during the Q & A section later.

Lothian will begin by stating "The 3 buildings at the World Trade center were brought down by a combination of impact damage and fires" (or words to that effect). Lothian will then rest his case, as only imbeciles think otherwise and it is for them to prove their case not the other way round

TruthSeeker1234 will begin by stating "The 3 buildings at the World Trade Center were brought down by pre-planted incindiaries and explosives" (or words to that effect). TruthSeeker1234 will then proceed to present a load of crap for 10 minutes while, utilizing his laptop and the monitor as desired he will try to avoid getting too wet from Lothian’s water pistol. Lothian will try not to laugh, mock and ridicule too much during this time.

Lothian will throw the flour bags at (the now wet) Truthseeker for 5 mins.
TruthSeeker1234 will go away for 5 mins to clean himself up.

The Moderator begins reading the pre-submitted questions. First asks TruthSeeker a question written by Lothain, then the reverse. A public vote is taken after each question and the loser removes an item of clothing before the next question is asked.

Continue alternating Q & A until Truthseeker is naked. Should take about 4-5 minutes.

Live call in question. Both participants comment.

Final clock is checked, remaining air time (about 6 minutes), is divided up equally for Lothian’s closing statement, then TruthSeeker1234 closing statement. Men in white coats take Truthseeker away
I'm looking up the contact info for LA public access stations as we speak. I should have you booked by the end of the day.
 
As I've written before, in other threads, if this must be live: Formal rules of debate, neutral and mutually agreed upon location, no audience (prefered since it might cost either party time if the audience is disruptive, but not nescessary), neutral and mutually agreed upon moderator, and uncut audio and video given to both parties.

What's this crap about needing a computer? When I was in high school, you only needed note cards (at most). You're not going to have time to google your subjects, just come prepared. I also suggest you debate only one topic, thus your notes will not need to be as elaborate.
 
Oh, wow - Happy Birthday, Lisa!

What are you, 12, 13 now?

:D

(You don't look a day over 8 - but avatars can be deceiving.)
 
TS1234, I challenge you to a debate in front of my house in five minutes. Or are you too chicken?

Yes, given the recent unveiled murder threats leveled by a JREF member against specific members of the truth movement, I am indeed scared to me you in front of your house.
 
He's a busy little beaver. Basically he's got:
Controlled Demolition
Buildings "powderized" so that no debris of even a "macroscopic" size (his word, macroscopic)
The timing of the seismic records PROVES there were explosions prior to the planes hitting.

All have been trashed and thrashed but he won't be a good little beaver troll and go home. He has refused a closed thread debate and now wants a televised (read: Hey I'm going to cut it up and put it on YouTube with some eerie music and claim I won) debate instead.

Oh, and he's an admitted liar and forger. See the thread on Wikipedia he started! He's more than a troll, he's a gen-u-ine surprise-a-minute laugh riot.

CurtC
To add to what's already been said, he starts a thread making a conspiracy claim. When his *** gets handed to him in that thread, he either states his same original point again, without further evidence than what's already been refuted, or starts a new thread about a different subject. All without ever acknowledging that his original point had been refuted. That's why we have so many threads started by him right now.

A point in his favor is that he's mostly kept his points separated to discuss individually, instead of what most CTs do when they get backed into a corner: make a hundred different claims all together so that the ensuing discussion can go nowhere.

Thanks for that Foolmewunz & CurtC

So he’s the kind of troll that has found his 15 minutes of fame by making absurd suggestions, and his egotistical feelings of grandeur are fuelled by equally absurd and delusional followers.

So I was right, he is L Ron Hubbard. :D
 
Yes, given the recent unveiled murder threats leveled by a JREF member against specific members of the truth movement, I am indeed scared to me you in front of your house.
That's why I suggest the international space station. We'll both be safe there.

Or are you too chicken?
 
I *love* the idea of a single-topic debate! How about debating the 'no-planes' theory at the Pentagon?
 
Yes, given the recent unveiled murder threats leveled by a JREF member against specific members of the truth movement, I am indeed scared to me you in front of your house.

Man, unless you have well documented proof of this, I am forwarding this to the mods for your banning from this site.

TAM
 

Back
Top Bottom