> I can't make sense of any of this but a particular highlight is Q3. Something, something, gay people, adamized (whatever that's intended to mean) 8x the genocidal ratio of Nazis. It's a tour de force of gibberish and yet somehow it snares you and draws you to want to discover by what insane measure the Americans are 8 times as bad as the Nazis.
What exactly don't you "understand" about USG 8xing the genocidal ratio of Nazi Germany during WWII? I had posted in this thread a link to the 3rd grade common core Math necessary to "understand" it along with a T-table kind of explanation of every step:
https://theintercept.com/2015/04/17/ramstein/?comments=1comment-124608
I could only help you "understand", if you were to at least explain where exactly is the insanity in:
a) establishing two ratios,
b) comparing two fractions and
c) a division/the 8 times table.
When you go to the doctor you have to tell them where it hurts and how, if you want to get help (there you have a low hanging mango for you satisfying your mind's requirements). If I tell you that "the sun rises on the East every day" (or so it has for a long time), you certainly know what "sun", "to rise", "East", "day", "every" mean to assign to that statement a truth value or not, and if you don't "understand" it, based on its constituent terms, you can certainly articulate a reason as to why you don't and express exactly what is it you "can't understand" or don't "agree with".
Not that I care about "the good in them" when they went about their "freedom loving" business, but I even used their worst figures for my Math. Have you heard public rants by Nazis? They sound so similar to those by USG, that you won't be able to tell them apart! What makes the difference is that Nazis were "honest", meant, owned their ****. They would not call stealing half of the oil production by Venezuela "the alliance for progress" or say that the Monroe doctrine was to "protect" countries in the American continent from European imperial powers. Nazis a century later would call something for what it meant: -Lebensraum-. I once asked a history teacher to test that (using Adolf Hitler's very rants) with his own students. He told me that "he would be fired 'for other reasons' and would not be able to find a job ever again". He asked me: "but what are you going to teach as U.S. history then?". As I previously said, if you want to clearly see what I mean, visit a museum in Germany and what gringos consider to be their historical museums (which are like Disney world franchises, theme parks).
to adamize: is a verb used by semioticians/linguists to describe, track how a term or concept happens, trends, "evolves". I see it as some sort of Hegelizing textual conscientization (to put it somehow), not exactly, entirely physically relating to cause-effect sorts of things. We invented writing to record what we meant so that other people can read/mind/"own" it for themselves. With adamizations it kinds of happens the other way around there are certain things that we need, choose to "own"/believe/"read" ... so we need to "write" it, invent philosophies, make it "real" (but not "real" as the reality of that falling apple incident noticed by Newton).
It was written in the Bible that "God created Adam in his image" to make sense of things, us and himself "God".
In the Hegelian sense there are always semantic aspects of it you can't quite control, possibly know in advance, predict. Jeremy Bentham pointed out (my way to make his idea more easily "understandable". I hope you will be very welcome! Otherwise read up on it!): even though we invented money (a necessary functional illusion, social fiction), we cannot escape the consequences of our messing with our own conscious "fictions" when we missuse, abuse them ... (induced financial crises) and in the same way that when we invented words we automatically invented the possibility of lying, when we invented money, we invented financial speculations, getting "smart" about it, ... I think Bentham, like Kant, would have emphasized these days all those nukes waiting to go "pop" and Murphy's law.
Examples of adamizations to illustrate its meaning (using one of the themes in this thread you don't "understand"):
// __ How did WWI and WWII adamized:
1.a) Darwin, with some loose ends but in the main right (he didn't know about Mendel's research), proposed "natural selection" using breeding ("artificial selection") as explanatory paradigm.
1.b) the "meme" "survival of the fittest" surfaced and is noticed as a profitable ideation
1.c) §b's meme is taken from Darwin's and reinterpreted by his very cousin in an "artificial selection", "white man burden", protagonistic kind of way. Darwin puts aside his scientific cool and vestiges of Victorian ancestry to question/try to clarify his cousin's ideas. When did he effing ever imply any of those racist ideations? (racism, biologically speaking, is hard chore absurdity, you can't improve a species by destroying the natural diversity a species needs to maintain itself, evolve) ... but no one wanted to hear any of it, because it didn't satisfy their "long live their crappy queen" kind of protagonism ... Victorian England stopped cracking jokes about Darwin's ideas (asking him if he descended from a monkey from his father's, or mother's side ;-)) and got smart about repurposing such ideas in the way they needed.
1.d) the British freedom lovingly protagonized/appropriated such ideas in the way that fit them to justify their abuse to Negritos all over the world, which they saw and still see as their claim to "greatness" ... they were just "helping them" get "civilized" after all. Look at the skin color of those Negritos, those towels with which they cover their head, the extravagantly long ponytails of the Chinese (their queue)! That "explains" why they want, need to get "freedom loved" ...
1.e) actually the British turned their exploitation and abuse into some sort of official state philosophy, their very ethos, but the imperial powers of the time: Spain with their "autos de fe" in the newly discovered continent, Portugal, the Dutch, the French, Belgian, ... didn't do any better, all they needed to prove to themselves that they were right were guns and canons. Easy! As the Belgian gov with the "help" of the CIA made clear by assassinating Patrice Lumumba, they want Negritos to "keep their place", they don't want for them not to be corrupt and concern themselves with morally sophisticated matters which could be harmful to themselves. Imperial powers are so caring, so altruistically humane!
1.f) they freedom lovingly sectioned the world themselves into sizable "areas of interests" and respected their shared ideals and "gentlemen agreements". Gringos had the great ideas of genocidally dealing with their native population which they have continued to this very day, the Westward expansion, the Monroe doctrine, making "hard choices", ... and they did that as they have been droning little girls and their grandma's these days (nothing or very little that matters has changed):
// __ The Canary Effect - Native Americans documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLsIIlFru8E
~
// __ Madeleine Albright says 500,000 dead Iraqi Children was "worth it" wins Medal of Freedom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omnskeu-puE
~
https://theintercept.com/2017/01/30...emen-trump-just-killed-his-8-year-old-sister/
https://theintercept.com/2015/04/24/obama-drone-apology/
~
"because" "they have the reponsibility to take care of more important matters" (tm), for "progress", "freedom", "to make sure that justice prevails in the universe", ... "because" "they hear God telling them things" (BTW, their God is so, but so selective and so, abusively "smart", has such schizophrenic blind spots!?! it doesn't seem to be able to pinpoint China and/or Russia on a map, which to mere mortals like you and me would be easy) ... and "because" "those people don't really matter". But, wait!?, who were the ones who were exterminating Jewish people, gipsies, gay people, political opponents, ... anyone that stood in their way on an industrial scale? and why? Wasn't it because "Untermenschen" didn't matter? Oh, no! Wasn't it because "Arbeit macht frei!"? (now, you tell me how much more gringo that phrase could be when they say that they care about "democracy", "freedom", ..., however, it was not said by them) Well, freedom lovers have 8xed all of that"!
1.g) Germany (as always, historically dealing with their own daemons) comes late to the party: "sorry, party is over you were late. We have already enjoyed all the fun, party started at 5PM, but you arrived at 9PM ... we already had all the drinks, the food, effed all the girls, who seemed to have instantly fallen in love with us" ... Germany never quite got how you do it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero_and_Namaqua_genocide
~
1.h) Germany: Oh! this is it? That is the deal? OK, why not taking you as -our- negritos? WWI, ...
1.i) European imperial powers got really upset about Germany "unacceptably crazy" behavior not respecting their bsing "philosophies", "gentlemen agreements", ... They laughed their heads off when the Ethiopian king protested the invasion by Italy in the League of the Nations, but were at a loss when Germany attacked them. Great Lord, that is beyond "crazy"! How could they point their guns and canons at us? So they "legally", "rightfully" punished Germany with becoming their "Negritos" as well, with such crazy debts that even people who were as anti German as they could possibly be protested it. To their understanding, Germany has "lost" WWI, so it deserved that kind of abuse. Germany itself was like, that was great! We can certainly do this!
1.j) Germany: Hmm! You have effectively turned us into your "Negritos". Hell, no! Nazis managed to get a grip on political power.
1.k) WWII, ... Imperial Powers got a doses of their own medicine, formidable kick in their pants. That was as pure an act of poetic justice on a cosmic scale as it could ever have been. Spain and Italy were spared, they were freedom loved by their own government.
1.l) Nazi Germany also, being adamized by their own history (when the German tribes started the end of the "pax romana" bs), the gringo "Monroe Doctrine" as the proof of concept of what centuries later became their "Lebensraum" ideations, ... made the crass mistake to missjudge those "Untermenschen" Russian people ... who were working hard at pulling their nation out of feudalism when Nazis attacked them.
Something that happens with adamizations in relation to the characteristics of things consciously used, which also relates to Hegel's slave owner-slave dialectic, is that (to explain it somehow) what is good for the goose will definitely be good for the gander as well even if the goose is exploiting the gander or viceversa even if in a different way. When you turn someone into your slave, you are at the same time making fertile a certain ground you will depend, but won't be able to stand, grow on. Gringos consider themselves to be the worldsonlysuperpower ...
The Roman empire built all those vias out of their empire to mess with other peoples. Like gringos nowadays, quite naturally, they made messing with other people the very essence of their existence. "Barbaric" peoples used those same vias to come to Rome to mess with them ;-). You see the same with the U.S. and China, after "USG won the cold war by having Reagan stand tall to them", they exploited China for their cheap labor force ...
Ironically, gringos as part of their protagonic, movie-like bullsh!t like to see themselves as "democratic" when Athenians, the ones who invented "democracy" as social technologies to make and manage their own government openly and transparently, would most probably see them as they saw the Persian empire trying to turn them into slaves and from which they succesfully defended themselves. One of the greatest ideas gringos have ever had is making laws (even their interpretations!) secret. I wonder what Athenians would think of that and that one of their presidents (aka: "yes, we scan!") who boasted about sitting his black rear end in fancy law schools "studying" Constitutional Law (as he said) was the one most enthusiastic about such things.
// __ How ideations about "not understanding" adamize:
2.a) show gringos Star Wars while they are young
2.b) make sure they spend (1/4)+ of their waking life watching TV, their cell phones, ...
2.c) even though you are gut sure that you are above and beyond physical reality (because God is on your side and all of that), you make sure you never, effing ever! engage any power with whom you could actually test those ideations about being the worldsonlysuperpower, "'the' 'brave' ...", (USG seems to have learned a few lessons from Nazi Germany, unfortunately, they learned them in their own ways ...) Of course, you also need "philosophies", "doctrines", ... as "let's-feel-great-about-it" ideations, TV-sets, "not understanding" certain things ... to toy your mind with as well;
2.d) when someone points it out to you, showing the very easy Math proving that USG's freedom loving in their latest wars 8xed the genocidal ratio of Nazi Germany, you "can't understand" "what is meant" ... and that is only a factual aspect of some other important ones on which USG would not hold the high ground, not even while demonstrably comparing them to Nazis.
2.e) gringos even though they are the most propagandized people on planet earth (some people who know about such matters have told me that Israelis are way more propagandized/brainwashed, that when you mention to them that they are occupying Palestine, they would, quite naively, go like "occupation", what is that?), but they are cock-sure that they are not because this is "unAmerican" (as they talk and apparently think) ...
