• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Rigged ***2008*** Elections

rwguinn said:
:confused::D
$%^&ing ijit kids.
G. O. B.
o. l o
o d y
d s

not GOP.

sigh...
Another dated reference right over their heads...
Click to expand...

Oops. A thousand apologies. I read G.O.B. in your post as GOP. I was just an "ijit kid" when the term G.O.B. was used. I barely remember that being thrown around during the Reagan years. I was still in grade school then. :)
 
leftysergeant said:
Florida 2000 and the "felon purges" without verifying that people with similar names were not mis-identified. Harris didn't bother because it took a lot of black people off the rolls and increased the chance of her darling winning.
Click to expand...

Harris wasn't involved in those felon purges, IIRC. The law stipulated that lists of known felons be compiled by a contracted company. The company which compiled the lists used in the 2000 elections had its contract signed before Harris became Secretary of State, and long before the election. In addition, the law stated that it was the responsibility of the local governments--not the Secretary of State--to remove blacklisted names from voter rolls. Harris would be free of responsibility. This is even confirmed by Clay Roberts.

Even if Harris did have some kind of responsibility, there's still no proof that any shirking of said responsibility was a deliberate act intended to rig the election.

Some idiot on Karl Rove's staff e-mailed proof of that to a friend of Greg Palast's, who happily turned it over to Palast.
Click to expand...

I had to dig through a dozen random blogs to find one containing a link to "some of the e-mails", none of which looked in any way incriminating. Perhaps you could point me in the right direction.

If Kenneth Blackwell turned over every scrap of paper related to the elections in Ohio 2004 and they verified everything he said. But that is not going to happen because he has already destroyerd evidence in defiance of court orders.
Click to expand...

Has Blackwell been convicted of anything?

In any case, if you're saying that the evidence that would convince you is something that nobody would be able to provide even if you were wrong, you're going to have to revise your answer to this question. It's like demanding someone give you a live unicorn in order to prove their loyalty.
 
Oliver don't you have politicians and elections in your own country to worry about?

-Gumboot
 
It's a good thing that there is no rule limiting the number of threads a single poster can start about the same frigging topic disguised as a subset of said topic.

I'm all for free expression and I defend it vigorously, but JFC, it grows wearisome when someone who doesn't know squat about a particular subject starts multiple threads on the same subject across numerous subforums, ad nauseam.

As to the OP, the answer is "see above" and "see the last dozen threads you've started on the same over-arching subject matter."
 
Damien Evans said:
You Americans have no right to bag anyone elses beer. You should instead be hanging your head in shame and begging forgiveness for giving this world miller "genuine draft" and budweiser. That is all.
Click to expand...

Are you countering with Molson, or Molson Ice?
 
mortimer said:
Are you countering with Molson, or Molson Ice?
Click to expand...

No, he's an Aussie. Let him explain Foster's! :spjimlad:



(I know - Americans like it... but the Aussies really don't drink much of it, and like their beer a little stronger-tasting. VB is an excellent mass-produced beer, for instance.)
 
Foolmewunz said:
No, he's an Aussie. Let him explain Foster's! :spjimlad:



(I know - Americans like it... but the Aussies really don't drink much of it, and like their beer a little stronger-tasting. VB is an excellent mass-produced beer, for instance.)
Click to expand...
lol, the fosters you buy in america is brewed in canada (at least thats how it used to be)
 
gumboot said:
Oliver don't you have politicians and elections in your own country to worry about?

-Gumboot
Click to expand...


Sure. We do have politicians and elections. But we have
no rigged elections to laugh about.. :(
 
1337m4n said:
Why did the Democrats win in 2006?
Click to expand...

Enough of us voted on paper that there was no way to fix it.

As for evidence of criminal action on Blackwell's part, the abscense of evidence that was supposed to be maintained to verify that the election was not tampered is, in itself, a crime.
 
leftysergeant said:
Enough of us voted on paper that there was no way to fix it.
Click to expand...

You're joking, right?

So if Reps win, it's because they cheated. If Dems win, it's because the Reps couldn't cheat enough to overcome the sheer number of Dems who voted. :rolleyes:
 
mortimer said:
You're joking, right?

So if Reps win, it's because they cheated. If Dems win, it's because the Reps couldn't cheat enough to overcome the sheer number of Dems who voted. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Yeah, where have you been for the past 7 years? The Republicans never win an election unless by fraudulent means. Heck, it's been going on since 1960.

Wait...
 
gumboot said:
Oliver don't you have politicians and elections in your own country to worry about?

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

Yes, but they don't involve mindless, baseless reflex criticisms of the U.S.

I know Oliver says he's in his thirties, but his posts read to me like those of an adolescent who has just discovered the real doesn't always live up to the ideal - and has had his universe thoroughly shattered by the discovery.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom