• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Richard Gage offers Hard Evidence!

So if I get it right. The floors were disloged from their places and smashed into pieces when they hit the ground or when they got hit by the above falling floors?

Most of them appear to have, there are pictures such as the one above of a small chunk and there are other reports from Ground Zero workers who reported 14 floors compressed into a few feet.

They were only something like 4 inches thick over the entire acre, without support it would entirely collapse and crumble under its own weight. The steel trusses were the load carrying mechanism.
 
Richard Gage believes that all the meteorites are large chunks of previously molten iron.

Steven Jones, Fetzer, et al, were asked years ago to explain how "molten metal" solidifies around rebar without melting the rebar.

I'm still waiting for their answer.
 
"...even papers with legible type are visible." Does that sound like paper embedded into molten iron to you?
Paper will ignite if it is 233 C (451 F) at which temperature iron wouldn't be molten. Either we just have to accept that the paper we see was coated with an extremely good (yet invisible) form of SFRM or it was protected by some sort of force field. Let's all sit back and anxiously (yet patiently) await the truth movement's answer to this apparent paradox...
 
Obviously, the fact that they didn't use the paper fireproofing on the structural steel is just more proof of how inside this inside job was...
 
I'm disappointed Mr. Gage didn't use a quote from the esteemed Michael Rotch among those listed at the end of the paper. After all, he's just as credible as the rest.:rolleyes:

To all of the points listed in his paper, though, I can only offer a hearty
19757486014e32cfd1.jpg
 
This is a minor item, but I thought it amusing. Remember "Meatball on a fork is a metaphor"? Or the ever popular, "If your co-workers have any questions, intelligent or otherwise, please forward them. That you were unable to intuit the obvious implications of rakeonrake suggests that, if they're anything like you, they won't have any at all."

Those wonderful moments were brought to us by Petgoat, a poster at the Democratic Underground's 9-11 subforum. Now here's a claim (in the comments) that he's working for Richard Gage's group:

First clear this for us Richard, Do you still have Brian Good ( petgoat )working with you? Is this true? Is he still connected with your organization? Thanks for your answer in advance.

Good was listed as the contact person for the recent taping of Richard Gage's latest DVD.

Date: Sun, May 11, 2008
Time: 5:30 pm
Topic: Special filming for new AE911Truth DVD
Speaker: Richard Gage, AIA
Venue:
RSVP Required: Video Production Studio!
Contact Brian Good for address information.
 
Oops sorry thought that this thread was about Richard Gage getting into the Porn business and announcing his first film title.
 
Last edited:
Oops sorry thought that this thread was about Richard Gage getting into the Porn business and announcing his first film title.
That put's a brand new twist on their predilection with the term pull it...

Forgive me but this is Bobert's fault, he started by giving me this awful mental picture of tricky dicky gage...
 
has Gage Totally Lost It? Has He Gone The Way Of Fetzer, Realizing That The Only People Who Take Him Seriously Are Maroons And That He Can Just Say Anything As Long As He Says It Often Enough, And Keeps His Fingers In His Ears (and Blindfolds On His Eyes) And Just Ignores Any/all Common Sense And Scientific Evidence That Refutes His Nonsense?



Everytime I listen to Gage and his nonsense, I think of these guys......

potaevil.jpg
 
This is a minor item, but I thought it amusing. Remember "Meatball on a fork is a metaphor"? Or the ever popular, "If your co-workers have any questions, intelligent or otherwise, please forward them. That you were unable to intuit the obvious implications of rakeonrake suggests that, if they're anything like you, they won't have any at all."

Those wonderful moments were brought to us by Petgoat, a poster at the Democratic Underground's 9-11 subforum. Now here's a claim (in the comments) that he's working for Richard Gage's group:

Good was listed as the contact person for the recent taping of Richard Gage's latest DVD.

Gage has responded and confirmed, that Brian Good really works for him (see the same 9/11 Blogger comments section).

Richard Gage said:
Brian Good (pet goat)


Mensa123,

Not everyone sees eye to eye in the 9/11 Truth movement. People have problems with Fetzer, people have problems with Jones, people have problems with Griffin, and people have problems with me! Everyone seems to have their pet peeves. Brian Good has problems Willie R. I support Willie. But Brian has seen fit to find fault with him. We have discussed this extensively. As a result Brian has agreed to not attack Willie in public forums anymore while working for for AE911Truth. Brian has become one of the most hard working and trusted volunteers at AE911Truth. So, while I very much appreciate your concern, I hope you will be satisfied with my judgment in this matter.

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect
 
Good/Petgoat was also one of the superheroes for Troof:



He's in the Spiderman outfit. Wonder Woman is Carol Brouillet, one of the longest-active troofers out there. She has a semi-blog here, and tracking her changing attitudes towards Brian is interesting and revealing:

June 9, 2007:

Friday, Brian and I, in costume, leafletted the downtown Mountain View area before joining everyone for the regular Impeachment vigil at Castro and El Camino. Afterwards we went to downtown Palo Alto, which was "the happening place"- we quickly drew lots of attention, including from a Marine in full dress uniform who argued at length with Brian attracting a large crowd.

(Note: Brouillet is an activist for whatever catches her attention--she's antiwar, pro-impeachment, 9-11 Troof, etc.)

July 11, 2007:

I got up early to load my car and set up for the Listening Project and the Impeachment Rally. Brian helped me and brought the large Deception Dollar banner which he and Joni used when they held the Listening Project, in my absence.

September 9, 2007:

The great thing (for me) was that I was, at least, able to do the rally, march, and hand out the cards, which would have been impossible had it not been for Chuck and Brian and Scott, Bill, Bob, Camille, and others who helped carry stuff, set-up, minded the table, and pass out cards, too- it really was a group effort.

October 19, 2007:

I was stunned at last night's meeting when I was attacked heavily by Brian Good on the November 1st event AND the Trick or Truth idea, AND War on War Week- because of Kevin Barrett's involvement AND for having Captain May on my radio show. Jeremy Begin took Brian's side and the group voted against endorsing War on War Week and using any of our funds to promote it.

Unfortunately, Brian wrote a LONG attack email directed at me and cced to most of the local activists this morning which I was forced to respond to- and ate up much of my precious time.

On the brighter side, I do appreciate my family and friends more than ever for their understanding, love, and support, and I do hope that the time I spent responding to Brian's accusations might help increase understanding between Kevin Barrett and his accusers and mend some bridges (undoing the damage caused by those who are TRYING to create rifts in the movement and unjustly attacking Kevin Barrett, and Captain May, and I for being in league with those who have created some awful websites and films that target 9/11 Truth activists as members of Al Qaeda- with names, addresses and encouraging people to use violence against them.)

This is complicated, but Barrett has been on the skids with the Troofers for awhile now because of his association with Fetzer and the Directed Energy Weapons crowd, and because of his Holocaust Denial email. May is another anti-Semite who sees Jooos everywhere and who does numerology weirdness. May was also peripherally involved in a fiasco in Ireland thanks to JREF forum member 8Den. Morgan Stack had gotten DRG to make a speech in Ireland, but when Stack was found to have linked approvingly to some of May's anti-semitic posts, the owner of the venue where the speech was to be held cancelled it when 8Den brought it to his attention.

It also ties in with the Kennebunkport warning fiasco, where Webster Tarpley claimed to have gotten Cindy Sheehan to sign a statement warning President Bush not to use a fake terrorist incident to start a war with Iran. When Sheehan said that the statement had been altered after her signature, Tarpley went ballistic, referring to Sheehan as a "wretched human being". This effectively ended Sheehan's involvement with the Truthers and the much-ballyhooed attempt to integrate the 9-11 Truth Movement with the peace movement. This resulted in a lot of anger at Tarpley. Regardless of the facts about the signing, a lot of Troofers were angry at Tarpley for not being more conciliatory towards a high-profile person who had previously expressed at least a tentative friendship towards the nutbars.

This mostly split the Troofers along generational lines, with the oddball result that Steven Jones, Jim Fetzer, Kevin Barrett, and Webster Tarpley were participants in Les Jamieson's 9-11-07 festivities (along with Craig Ranke), while all the younger people went with Luke and the Changers.

Brouillet seems to have survived, while Good is now on the outs with the Bay Area kooks:

About eight of us will be attending the Media Strategy Summit in Santa Cruz at the end of the month. We voted to ask Brian not to attend meetings or be on committees- which was the most emotional, painful part of the meeting for most of us. I can't handle the emotional abuse.
 
Interesting post, Brainster. Can't make that stuff up :cool:
 
Carol Brouillet said:
I can't handle the emotional abuse.


"It's not fair, I thought activism was supposed to be all sunshine and puppies." :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
It is interesting to see how manipulative these people have become. Now they use the "Impeach Bush/Cheney", a line most in America would not find offensive, as a way to get their foot in the door, so they can spew their vial truther crap.

TAM:)
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom