The house isn't particularly large and it is comparatively (for the UK) well insulated. Our oil bill is about half of what our friends locally spend to heat their similarly sized houses. Oil-fired heating is just very expensive (likewise bottled gas) and we're not able to get mains gas out here.
This might be your problem (highlighted). As I recall, UK houses are generally well insulated - for heating up the garden

. Here, we have a different situation.
The problem about moving is that we like where we live. If financial necessity dictates that we have to move then that's what we'll have to do but after more than 45 years of hard work it will be a shame if we don't get to spend our dotage in the place we will have grown to love.
Sure, but ... if you can't afford it ....
I wasn't looking for sympathy, I was trying to explain the size of the problem. If people are saving a couple of thousand pounds each month for their retirement in the expectation that it'll be a comfortable retirement then they are in for a big shock.
Fair enough, but if people are expecting to have the same level of spending after retirement, they ARE in for a shock, or they need to do some massive saving up
IMO skimping on maintenance is a false economy, especially if you're old. We can't be in the position of having a leaky roof, bad gutters, an ineffective boiler or draughty windows when we are older
Not skimping that much, but whoever gets the house after you may ahve to do some repairs. If your house can't "run" without serious maintenance for a couple of decades, you may have the wrong type of house.
We live in a rural area with no public transport. If we stay here a reliable car would be more of a necessity than it is now
Well, there are other ways of saving on cars than reliability.
I appreciate what you say but that sounds like a recipe for grinding poverty in old age. Currently in the UK funding care for the elderly is a huge problem that will only get worse.
£50,000 a year is not unheard of, £36,000 is the average
I just mean, don't plan to be a 100, because most likely you won't. And if you do get very old, you will probably not need that many hobbies and such.
£36,000 a year does not sound too bad, but depends on the general cost of living.
IIRC you live in Denmark, a country which currently provides a decent state pension and has excellent social infrastructure.
Well, yes, but all
that means is that I have been paying a lot of taxes, instead of saving up.
You are also retiring after the best time to retire (which IMO was maybe 10-20 years ago - excellent occupational pensions, good life expectancy.
My parents and Mrs Don's parents timed it perfectly) but before the so-called demographic time-bomb really explodes.
Well, you can't really time your birthday, can you now?
I am pessimistic about retirement but I am taking as many precautions as possible to minimise the risk. Unless something goes horribly wrong, Mrs Don and I will be much better off than the vast majority of those retiring at the same time as we are but still we will be looking forward to a modest retirement at best.
If you can maintain a good house and expensive hobbies (golf and classic cars, indeed

), I wouldn't call it modest.
Hans