Assumes facts not in evidence.I expected it. The very first thing the rocket surgeons at Atheism+ did is was turn on each other. It's a depressingly common and entirely predictable failure mode of such communities.
The implosion of Atheism+ was well documented here. I assume nothing.Assumes facts not in evidence.
You assume the post saying people are fleeing BlueSky is factual.The implosion of Atheism+ was well documented here. I assume nothing.
Terrible analogy. Everyone curates their own feed. If you're seeing unpleasant ideas, it's because you want to.
I wasn't expecting the "fake news!" gambit. But sure, go with thatYou assume the post saying people are fleeing BlueSky is factual.
Did I claim it was fake? No. Asking for evidence is not claiming fake.I wasn't expecting the "fake news!" gambit. But sure, go with that
Well in fairness "some guy thinks it seems this way" might not be the most robust reporting.I wasn't expecting the "fake news!" gambit. But sure, go with that
Only to a certain extent. The Algorithm will always feed you things you didn't ask for, especially once Musk started manipulating it to further the rightist agenda.
No, this is flatly incorrect.
Even if you only view those you are following, its algorithm inserts tweets in the feed to drive engagement. I have never liked, followed or otherwise engaged with political content on twitter and yet the algorithm only inserts extreme political sentiment (both left and right) into my feed.
The fact that you have carefully curated your feed does not mean that Twitter is not an abuse-ridden cesspit. My Twitter too was carefully curated and I too managed to avoid most of it. BlueSky is better. It does everything Twitter does except enable abusers and neo-nazis.Honestly, how are you using Twitter? Ignore "For You" and just look at your "Following" feed. The only things that get inserted in that are adverts for holidays in China and inspirational lifestyle gurus.
Bluesky has more content to choose from?The fact that you have carefully curated your feed does not mean that Twitter is not an abuse-ridden cesspit. My Twitter too was carefully curated and I too managed to avoid most of it. BlueSky is better. It does everything Twitter does except enable abusers and neo-nazis.
It would be interesting to know if Bluesky like the other social media do simply tune their software to create "engagement". Unfortunately all the social media companies (and most media sites) have valued engagement over other metrics. If people want to know why there is so much disquiet, such apparent polarisation, hatred etc. "these days" it is because the social media platforms have rated engagement as a key measure of success, and engagement is what they have sold. Sadly the easiest way to drive "engagement" with humans is with the more negatives aspects of our behaviour such as mob behaviour, us & them and so on.No, this is flatly incorrect.
Even if you only view those you are following, its algorithm inserts tweets in the feed to drive engagement. I have never liked, followed or otherwise engaged with political content on twitter and yet the algorithm only inserts extreme political sentiment (both left and right) into my feed.
Honestly, how are you using Twitter? Ignore "For You" and just look at your "Following" feed. The only things that get inserted in that are adverts for holidays in China and inspirational lifestyle gurus.